I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
Nice 2 year old article as always.
Labor participation rate gone up or down since then?
I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
Nice 2 year old article as always.
Labor participation rate gone up or down since then?
That article has some fake "real unemployment" which uses a combination of labor participation rate. This is lame because it totally ignores societal changes. So Carter must be remembered as an economic marvel because labor force participation went up during his tenure.
Then it talks about consumer confidence being down, which is true. But why is that?
You are taking one number and focusing on it to prove your point. And you are wrong.
I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
Nice 2 year old article as always.
Labor participation rate gone up or down since then?
That article has some fake "real unemployment" which uses a combination of labor participation rate. This is lame because it totally ignores societal changes. So Carter must be remembered as an economic marvel because labor force participation went up during his tenure.
Then it talks about consumer confidence being down, which is true. But why is that?
You are taking one number and focusing on it to prove your point. And you are wrong.
With the "societal changes" being a large group exiting the workforce via disability, staying in school, etc. etc. That was the previous article. And if you want to brag on Carter's crappy economy forcing women into the workforce (men dropped under him) more power to you. Or are you now saying Obama's forcing women to stay home now?
I corrected myself and said you were not lying, you were just too dumb to understand, as the rest of your post shows yet again. Try and keep up.
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
Nice 2 year old article as always.
Labor participation rate gone up or down since then?
That article has some fake "real unemployment" which uses a combination of labor participation rate. This is lame because it totally ignores societal changes. So Carter must be remembered as an economic marvel because labor force participation went up during his tenure.
Then it talks about consumer confidence being down, which is true. But why is that?
You are taking one number and focusing on it to prove your point. And you are wrong.
With the "societal changes" being a large group exiting the workforce via disability, staying in school, etc. etc. That was the previous article. And if you want to brag on Carter's crappy economy forcing women into the workforce (men dropped under him) more power to you. Or are you now saying Obama's forcing women to stay home now?
God you give morons a bad name.
Holy shit. That's the point. You claim the economy is shitty now based on labor participation going down. But it went up when Carter was president, but you can his economy shitty too.
What I'm saying is you are a hypocrite, you just can't see it and you only response is to say I'm dumb.
You are a dumbfuck that doesn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Sunni.
Al Queda is Sunni.
ISIS is Sunni.
We started 2 huge wars to fight Sunni Islam groups that are 100% Sunni Islam.
But keep falling for the story that Shia is who we should fear. It makes your overlords happy.
False argument...they all hate us. It's not an either/or, but you are too dumb to comprehend that. Keep distracting from the ransom payment and the fact it's being used to arm terrorists though.
You sound as ignorant as Trump and all of his high school dropout voters.
So is it the Saudis or Iran/Hezbollah that love us?
One more time, because you seem really slow.
The 9/11 terrorists were 90% Saudi nationals. None of them were from Iran or Hezbollah.
If you can follow that... you can answer your question yourself.
Where did I say differently? It's a false argument...you seem to think that is the only terrorism that has ever occurred.
So just to confirm, you are now saying the Saudis hate us and Iran/Hezbollah love us?
I answered your question. If you wanted a different answer, ask a better question.
Again, you are a shill for the Saudi love machine. The country that indoctrinated the 9/11 terrorists to hate America and hate Christians.
I missed the old days when all terrorists were bad.
The old days? In the old days, England thought our Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism.
Maybe things are shades of grey on a spectrum of good and evil... not just black and white as the Trumptards believe.
What isn't black and white is your misguided sympathy towards those that would drag your semi rotted corpse by your balls in the street if given half of a chance.
You are a dumbfuck that doesn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Sunni.
Al Queda is Sunni.
ISIS is Sunni.
We started 2 huge wars to fight Sunni Islam groups that are 100% Sunni Islam.
But keep falling for the story that Shia is who we should fear. It makes your overlords happy.
False argument...they all hate us. It's not an either/or, but you are too dumb to comprehend that. Keep distracting from the ransom payment and the fact it's being used to arm terrorists though.
You sound as ignorant as Trump and all of his high school dropout voters.
So is it the Saudis or Iran/Hezbollah that love us?
One more time, because you seem really slow.
The 9/11 terrorists were 90% Saudi nationals. None of them were from Iran or Hezbollah.
If you can follow that... you can answer your question yourself.
Where did I say differently? It's a false argument...you seem to think that is the only terrorism that has ever occurred.
So just to confirm, you are now saying the Saudis hate us and Iran/Hezbollah love us?
I answered your question. If you wanted a different answer, ask a better question.
Again, you are a shill for the Saudi love machine. The country that indoctrinated the 9/11 terrorists to hate America and hate Christians.
I missed the old days when all terrorists were bad.
The old days? In the old days, England thought our Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism.
Maybe things are shades of grey on a spectrum of good and evil... not just black and white as the Trumptards believe.
What isn't black and white is your misguided sympathy towards those that would drag your semi rotted corpse by your balls in the street if given half of a chance.
You are a dumbfuck that doesn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Sunni.
Al Queda is Sunni.
ISIS is Sunni.
We started 2 huge wars to fight Sunni Islam groups that are 100% Sunni Islam.
But keep falling for the story that Shia is who we should fear. It makes your overlords happy.
False argument...they all hate us. It's not an either/or, but you are too dumb to comprehend that. Keep distracting from the ransom payment and the fact it's being used to arm terrorists though.
You sound as ignorant as Trump and all of his high school dropout voters.
So is it the Saudis or Iran/Hezbollah that love us?
One more time, because you seem really slow.
The 9/11 terrorists were 90% Saudi nationals. None of them were from Iran or Hezbollah.
If you can follow that... you can answer your question yourself.
Where did I say differently? It's a false argument...you seem to think that is the only terrorism that has ever occurred.
So just to confirm, you are now saying the Saudis hate us and Iran/Hezbollah love us?
I answered your question. If you wanted a different answer, ask a better question.
Again, you are a shill for the Saudi love machine. The country that indoctrinated the 9/11 terrorists to hate America and hate Christians.
I missed the old days when all terrorists were bad.
The old days? In the old days, England thought our Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism.
Maybe things are shades of grey on a spectrum of good and evil... not just black and white as the Trumptards believe.
What isn't black and white is your misguided sympathy towards those that would drag your semi rotted corpse by your balls in the street if given half of a chance.
You are confusing the goal of understanding others, with sympathy, not quite the same thing.
If you don't understand what motivates others, you are destined to be as stupid as Trump and his supporters.
You are a dumbfuck that doesn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Sunni.
Al Queda is Sunni.
ISIS is Sunni.
We started 2 huge wars to fight Sunni Islam groups that are 100% Sunni Islam.
But keep falling for the story that Shia is who we should fear. It makes your overlords happy.
False argument...they all hate us. It's not an either/or, but you are too dumb to comprehend that. Keep distracting from the ransom payment and the fact it's being used to arm terrorists though.
You sound as ignorant as Trump and all of his high school dropout voters.
So is it the Saudis or Iran/Hezbollah that love us?
One more time, because you seem really slow.
The 9/11 terrorists were 90% Saudi nationals. None of them were from Iran or Hezbollah.
If you can follow that... you can answer your question yourself.
Where did I say differently? It's a false argument...you seem to think that is the only terrorism that has ever occurred.
So just to confirm, you are now saying the Saudis hate us and Iran/Hezbollah love us?
I answered your question. If you wanted a different answer, ask a better question.
Again, you are a shill for the Saudi love machine. The country that indoctrinated the 9/11 terrorists to hate America and hate Christians.
I missed the old days when all terrorists were bad.
The old days? In the old days, England thought our Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism.
Maybe things are shades of grey on a spectrum of good and evil... not just black and white as the Trumptards believe.
What isn't black and white is your misguided sympathy towards those that would drag your semi rotted corpse by your balls in the street if given half of a chance.
Wouldn't balls be a requirement? Can't drag Ozone by his taint!
You are a dumbfuck that doesn't know the difference between Shia and Sunni.
All of the 9/11 terrorists were Sunni.
Al Queda is Sunni.
ISIS is Sunni.
We started 2 huge wars to fight Sunni Islam groups that are 100% Sunni Islam.
But keep falling for the story that Shia is who we should fear. It makes your overlords happy.
False argument...they all hate us. It's not an either/or, but you are too dumb to comprehend that. Keep distracting from the ransom payment and the fact it's being used to arm terrorists though.
You sound as ignorant as Trump and all of his high school dropout voters.
So is it the Saudis or Iran/Hezbollah that love us?
One more time, because you seem really slow.
The 9/11 terrorists were 90% Saudi nationals. None of them were from Iran or Hezbollah.
If you can follow that... you can answer your question yourself.
Where did I say differently? It's a false argument...you seem to think that is the only terrorism that has ever occurred.
So just to confirm, you are now saying the Saudis hate us and Iran/Hezbollah love us?
I answered your question. If you wanted a different answer, ask a better question.
Again, you are a shill for the Saudi love machine. The country that indoctrinated the 9/11 terrorists to hate America and hate Christians.
I missed the old days when all terrorists were bad.
The old days? In the old days, England thought our Boston Tea Party was an act of terrorism.
Maybe things are shades of grey on a spectrum of good and evil... not just black and white as the Trumptards believe.
What isn't black and white is your misguided sympathy towards those that would drag your semi rotted corpse by your balls in the street if given half of a chance.
Wouldn't balls be a requirement? Can't drag Ozone by his taint!
Comments
And I love the 'its the same calc as in 2006 (where it was still artificially low but didn't have the percentages of people on disability or hiding in school because they couldn't find jobs as there are currently) so it must be the same as in 1988. Brilliant.
Lots of economic studies out there showing that age demographics are a minor player in the falling labor participation rate:
http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/09/not-looking-for-work-why-labor-force-participation-has-fallen-during-the-recovery
The recovery has been crappy, but you should be proud of yourself for distracting a thread on the $400 million cash ransom payment being used by Iran to fund its military/terrorist organization and turning it into yet another example of your ignorance, this time on economic issues...
Here is one from today if it makes you feel better:
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/its-time-to-dump-the-unemployment-rate/
Moron.
Then it talks about consumer confidence being down, which is true. But why is that?
You are taking one number and focusing on it to prove your point. And you are wrong.
God you give morons a bad name.
What I'm saying is you are a hypocrite, you just can't see it and you only response is to say I'm dumb.
If you don't understand what motivates others, you are destined to be as stupid as Trump and his supporters.