CIA labels Trump 'threat to national security'
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html
1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this.
Comments
-
But unsecured servers aren't an issue
-
I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.OZONE said:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html
1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this. -
As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.RaceBannon said:But unsecured servers aren't an issue
-
You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.OZONE said:
As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.RaceBannon said:But unsecured servers aren't an issue
-
So a Obamao appointee says Trumps bad. That means Trumps not bad. But you don't get it. Jim Jones is serving Kool Aid drop by for a cup.OZONE said:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html
1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this. -
I've already essentially said this, why do I need to repeat it in every post? I agree she is not a great candidate, and I was in favor of somebody else, but it is time to move forward and choose from the two options, as bad as they both are.Swaye said:
You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.OZONE said:
As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.RaceBannon said:But unsecured servers aren't an issue
I'm just having fun pointing out, daily, what an idiot the (R) party chose as their nominee. Regardless of how bad Clinton is, Trump is 1000 times worse, and so bad, that we are making history on a daily basis with people coming out against him. Republicans, government officials, etc. -
Unsecured server >>> insecure self-serverRaceBannon said:But unsecured servers aren't an issue
-
We really need to be able to flag moderatorsDerekJohnson said:
I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.OZONE said:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html
1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this. -
Yeah, why is he still here?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
We really need to be able to flag moderatorsDerekJohnson said:
I'm sure he was compensated well to issue that statement.OZONE said:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/05/politics/michael-morell-clinton-endorsement/index.html
1st time in history a candidate has been so bad that the former CIA chief was compelled to denounce him like this. -
Yet, after several investigations, there's been zero evidence any breech occurred.Swaye said:
You aren't dumb, stop acting like it. Yes, the servers may not have been more secure, but there would have been oversight of them, and breach detection/mitigation if it occurred. Good God. Why do you defend shit you know is so fucking stupid? Just say look, I know what Hillary did was dumb as fuck, and borderline criminal, but I like her better than Trump anyway. Christ.OZONE said:
As security experts have proven, there is no proof that the emails would have been more secure if the gov't ran the servers.RaceBannon said:But unsecured servers aren't an issue
Not defending, pointing out a fact. So don't twist.
