Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Trump the candidate is terrific for Trump the bidnessman
Comments
-
Women don't have their own money. I don't believe that article.
-
What's funny is that people will avoid properties with the name "Trump" on it, even though Trump doesn't have ownership in all of them. Nobody does their homework.
-
Would it matter. Probably not.Fenderbender123 said:What's funny is that people will avoid properties with the name "Trump" on it, even though Trump doesn't have ownership in all of them. Nobody does their homework.
-
Would it matter in terms of what?
-
In terms of if someone who refuses to stay in a trump property, actually pulled the Form K1 schedule 10D line81 and found Trump had no financial stake in said property, that person would then say "oh, in that case. I totally want to stay here then".Fenderbender123 said:Would it matter in terms of what?
Of course not. Don't be FS.
-
IronicBallSacked said:
In terms of if someone who refuses to stay in a trump property, actually pulled the Form K1 schedule 10D line81 and found Trump had no financial stake in said property, that person would then say "oh, in that case. I totally want to stay here then".Fenderbender123 said:Would it matter in terms of what?
Of course not. Don't be FS. -
Choosing to license his brand is reason enough to avoid because it indicates they are fucking stupid.Fenderbender123 said:What's funny is that people will avoid properties with the name "Trump" on it, even though Trump doesn't have ownership in all of them. Nobody does their homework.
-
That's not the funny part. The funny part is that people will not stay there thinking "that'll show Trump!" When really they aren't hurting him at all.BallSacked said:
In terms of if someone who refuses to stay in a trump property, actually pulled the Form K1 schedule 10D line81 and found Trump had no financial stake in said property, that person would then say "oh, in that case. I totally want to stay here then".Fenderbender123 said:Would it matter in terms of what?
Of course not. Don't be FS. -
The Trump brand is that toxic.Fenderbender123 said:What's funny is that people will avoid properties with the name "Trump" on it, even though Trump doesn't have ownership in all of them. Nobody does their homework.
-
-
This thread is fucking terrible.
-
I can help your Viking issues, not this thread.Dennis_DeYoung said:This thread is fucking terrible.
-
I chuckled.Fenderbender123 said:
That's not the funny part. The funny part is that people will not stay there thinking "that'll show Trump!" When really they aren't hurting him at all.BallSacked said:
In terms of if someone who refuses to stay in a trump property, actually pulled the Form K1 schedule 10D line81 and found Trump had no financial stake in said property, that person would then say "oh, in that case. I totally want to stay here then".Fenderbender123 said:Would it matter in terms of what?
Of course not. Don't be FS. -
Crisped.Baseman said:
I, cuckold.Fenderbender123 said:
That's not the funny part. The funny part is that people will not stay there thinking "that'll show Trump!" When really they aren't hurting him at all.BallSacked said:
In terms of if someone who refuses to stay in a trump property, actually pulled the Form K1 schedule 10D line81 and found Trump had no financial stake in said property, that person would then say "oh, in that case. I totally want to stay here then".Fenderbender123 said:Would it matter in terms of what?
Of course not. Don't be FS.
