Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Why I'm voting for Trump

topdawgnc
topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
in Tug Tavern
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«13

Comments

  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    They need to fuck on PPV already
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If making dumb political statements is a disqualifier for public office, Trump Hillary should have been banned from public office several decades ago.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58rLBBpCE2M
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Southerndawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    If making dumb political statements is a disqualifier for public office, Trump Hillary should have been banned from public office several decades ago.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=58rLBBpCE2M
    Agree. She is also trash.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,098
    A Supreme Court Justice should not be making those kinds of comments ... just not her job.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    allpurpleallgold said:

    And they say people choose candidates for stupid reasons.

    Who is they?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    RaceBannon said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    And they say people choose candidates for stupid reasons.

    Who is they?
    People who talk about you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Southerndawg
    Southerndawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,346 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    allpurpleallgold said:

    And they say people choose candidates for stupid reasons.

    Who is they?
    People who hypocritically use sarcasm while voting en bloc.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    If anyone wants to become a Trump supporter, just start following him on Twitter.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839
    Fenderbender123 said:

    If anyone wants to become a Trump supporter, just start following him on Twitter.

    He needs to join this bored.

    It would be an upgrade
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    topdawgnc said:

    Fenderbender123 said:

    If anyone wants to become a Trump supporter, just start following him on Twitter.

    He needs to join this bored.

    It would be an upgrade
    So Hillary is setting across the table from Boobs and she says, "either your name is going to be on this contract to embarrass yourself all over the net or your brains are."

    Can you blame him?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    Tequilla said:

    A Supreme Court Justice should not be making those kinds of comments ... just not her job.

    Is there a law against it?

    So you think that free speech should apply to corporations, but not supreme court justices?

    Fascist much?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    OZONE said:

    Tequilla said:

    A Supreme Court Justice should not be making those kinds of comments ... just not her job.

    Is there a law against it?

    So you think that free speech should apply to corporations, but not supreme court justices?

    Fascist much?
    Please note, Ginsburg is not in jail. Nor sued by the government. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences one might prefer to avoid. Here, it's a matter of judicial impartiality. Obama's appointments from within his Justice Dept. have already recused themselves from a few cases brought before the Supreme Court, because they had been advocated for those cases personally prior to seating. They were, by definition, possessed of prejudice in a narrow sense.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fenderbender123
    Fenderbender123 Member Posts: 2,989
    topdawgnc said:

    Fenderbender123 said:

    If anyone wants to become a Trump supporter, just start following him on Twitter.

    He needs to join this bored.

    It would be an upgrade
    If he joined and started posting, I probably wouldn't even notice that it's him. Trump would blend right in here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    edited July 2016
    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary Trump" seem to agree with or parrot all of her his talking points are shit.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary" seem to agree with or parrot all of her talking points.

    Except for all the times we? point out what a drippy cunt she is.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    L
    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary" seem to agree with or parrot all of her talking points.

    This

    Plus 1

    Thank you for your service
    Let's hear you again parroting the loser mantra of tariffs and protectionism--pleading for help from the federal government to protect carpet installation, air conditioning and auto manufacturing. You are a fucking embarrrassment to this great nation.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510
    GrundleStiltzkin said:

    OZONE said:

    Tequilla said:

    A Supreme Court Justice should not be making those kinds of comments ... just not her job.

    Is there a law against it?

    So you think that free speech should apply to corporations, but not supreme court justices?

    Fascist much?
    Please note, Ginsburg is not in jail. Nor sued by the government. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences one might prefer to avoid. Here, it's a matter of judicial impartiality. Obama's appointments from within his Justice Dept. have already recused themselves from a few cases brought before the Supreme Court, because they had been advocated for those cases personally prior to seating. They were, by definition, possessed of prejudice in a narrow sense.

    Which has nothing to do with Ginsburg exercising her free speech, which Tequila was advocating she should not do -- which is what I was responding to.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    L

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary" seem to agree with or parrot all of her talking points.

    This

    Plus 1

    Thank you for your service
    Let's hear you again parroting the loser mantra of tariffs and protectionism--pleading for help from the federal government to protect carpet installation, air conditioning and auto manufacturing. You are a fucking embarrrassment to this great nation.
    Link?

    You suck at this

    But we all know that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,128
    I like Trump because he's entertaining. Hillary is just as bad as Trump and not entertaining.


    In the end, it really doesn't matter who wins.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CirrhosisDawg
    CirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390
    P
    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    L

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary" seem to agree with or parrot all of her talking points.

    This

    Plus 1

    Thank you for your service
    Let's hear you again parroting the loser mantra of tariffs and protectionism--pleading for help from the federal government to protect carpet installation, air conditioning and auto manufacturing. You are a fucking embarrrassment to this great nation.
    Link?

    You suck at this

    But we all know that
    Vote for Trump carpet installer. Who sucks again?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    CirrhosisDawg said:

    P

    RaceBannon said:

    CirrhosisDawg said:

    L

    RaceBannon said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    It's funny how the people who "aren't voting for Hillary" seem to agree with or parrot all of her talking points.

    This

    Plus 1

    Thank you for your service
    Let's hear you again parroting the loser mantra of tariffs and protectionism--pleading for help from the federal government to protect carpet installation, air conditioning and auto manufacturing. You are a fucking embarrrassment to this great nation.
    Link?

    You suck at this

    But we all know that
    Vote for Trump carpet installer. Who sucks again?
    I'm voting for Donald Johnson
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,760 Founders Club
    Oh and you suck

    Everyone knows that
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dflea
    dflea Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 7,287 Swaye's Wigwam
    I see nobody is talking about Hillary and her truth-challenged testimony any more because Ruth's ill-thought-out comments have taken center stage.

    Point Hillary.

    I'm thinking this doesn't help Trump, regardless of toppy's new endorsement.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter