Trump's latest affair
Comments
-
Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.
So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal? -
It was the backbone of the anti war movementdoogsinparadise said:
Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.
So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal?
-
Disagree, but sure.gif.
-
No. It wasn't.RaceBannon said:
It was the backbone of the anti war movementdoogsinparadise said:
Christ, it was wrong then and wrong now.RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
This was a common refrain against the war and still is used to say why it was a mistake.
So because Trump said it you're going to act like it is some big deal? -
"No blood for oil" and "9-11 was an inside job" were the rallying cry of the hipster Gen X douchebags. I don't recall anyone making intelligent arguments about creating a power vacuum.
Why run on the issues when the media will assassinate your opponent's character before the debates even start?HoustonHusky said:I think Hills should run on her vote and strong support for the Iraq War while in the Senate and subsequent overseeing of our pullout and the rise of ISIS while as Sec. of State. Should work for her...
-
Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
-
AbundanceTheGlove said:
Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
-
TheGlove said:
Is it the dementia or are you just trolling?RaceBannon said:Democratic Senators and Congressmen defended Saddam to the hilt when Bush was President. My idiot congressmen went to Baghdad.
-
-
But I also know that Saddam poses no imminent and direct threat to the United States or to his neighbors, that the Iraqi economy is in shambles, that the Iraqi military a fraction of its former strength, and that in concert with the international community he can be contained until, in the way of all petty dictators, he falls away into the dustbin of history. I know that even a successful war against Iraq will require a U.S. occupation of undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences. I know that an invasion of Iraq without a clear rationale and without strong international support will only fan the flames of the Middle East, and encourage the worst, rather than best, impulses of the Arab world, and strengthen the recruitment arm of al-Qaida. I am not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.
FO,G




