I'm not a Clinton fan, but...

Comments

• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  June 2016

  I'm not a Husky fan, but I think we will beat Oregon this year. Rather easily. Say, 34-17.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• HuskyInAZ Member Posts: 1,732

  June 2016

  Hi hondo

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

  June 2016

  I'm not a Romar fan but I think he will make the final 4 rather easily this year.

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• unfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303

  June 2016

  OZONE said:

  Hillary is going to eat Trump's lunch in the election.
  
  I think it may be the largest win % in 50 years.

  This is what I call solid analysis, good stuff brah!
  

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,168

  June 2016

  You're a Clinton fan.

  11 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• section8 Member Posts: 1,581

  June 2016

  

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457

  June 2016

  HuskyInAZ said:

  Hi hondo

  Yo

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

  June 2016 edited June 2016

  unfrozencaveman said:

  OZONE said:

  Hillary is going to eat Trump's lunch in the election.
  
  I think it may be the largest win % in 50 years.

  This is what I call solid analysis, good stuff brah!
  

  If you want solid analysis, read the NYTimes.
  
  This is HH.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

  June 2016 edited June 2016

  section8 said:

  

  Reagan only won the popular vote by 18%. Nixon's win in the 70s was bigger at 23%.
  
  I'm predicting Clinton takes Trump by 30%.
  
  Not because she is that good, but because he is that bad.
  
  When is the last time so many people left a party or endorsed the person from the OTHER party, because their party's candidate was so bad?

  -6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  June 2016

  OZONE said:

  section8 said:

  

  Reagan only won the popular vote by 18%. Nixon's win in the 70s was bigger at 23%.
  
  I'm predicting Clinton takes Trump by 30%.

  
  

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

  June 2016

  Duh. That much is obvious to everyone but the carpet layer.

  -1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

  June 2016

  RaceBannon said:

  You're a Clinton fan.

  Disagree. I was a Bernie supporter. In fact, I dislike her so much I might vote Green party.
  
  But Trump still sucks so much that she will beat him by 30%, even if a bunch of us vote Green.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  June 2016

  "Me and all my Bernie friends are staying home or voting for other candidates, but she's still going to win by 30%."
  
  -OzoneFS

  8 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

  June 2016

  Collegedoog post of the year

  13 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,168

  June 2016

  OZONE said:

  RaceBannon said:

  You're a Clinton fan.

  Disagree. I was a Bernie supporter. In fact, I dislike her so much I might vote Green party.
  
  But Trump still sucks so much that she will beat him by 30%, even if a bunch of us vote Green.

  Not the case. Polls with the Green and libertarian party included show a dead heat

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

  June 2016

  PurpleJ said:

  "Me and all my Bernie friends are staying home or voting for other candidates, but she's still going to win by 30%."
  
  -OzoneFS

  You sound angry.
  
  

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

  June 2016

  RaceBannon said:

  OZONE said:

  RaceBannon said:

  You're a Clinton fan.

  Disagree. I was a Bernie supporter. In fact, I dislike her so much I might vote Green party.
  
  But Trump still sucks so much that she will beat him by 30%, even if a bunch of us vote Green.

  Not the case. Polls with the Green and libertarian party included show a dead heat

  

  -2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  June 2016

  OZONE said:

  PurpleJ said:

  "Me and all my Bernie friends are staying home or voting for other candidates, but she's still going to win by 30%."
  
  -OzoneFS

  You sound angry.
  
  

  You sound stupid. Go earn a starting spot on the JV team before you tangle with me.
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

  June 2016

  RaceBannon said:

  OZONE said:

  RaceBannon said:

  You're a Clinton fan.

  Disagree. I was a Bernie supporter. In fact, I dislike her so much I might vote Green party.
  
  But Trump still sucks so much that she will beat him by 30%, even if a bunch of us vote Green.

  Not the case. Polls with the Green and libertarian party included show a dead heat

  Polls can easily be wrong.
  
  I'm basing my prediction on things like Laura Bush saying she will vote for Hillary over Trump.
  
  Trump has nearly no support among most of the educated Republicans -- unless you count Trump University graduates as educated. I predict those Republicans will abandon their party in droves in this election.
  

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,839

  June 2016

  OZONE said:

  section8 said:

  

  Reagan only won the popular vote by 18%. Nixon's win in the 70s was bigger at 23%.
  
  I'm predicting Clinton takes Trump by 30%.
  
  Not because she is that good, but because he is that bad.
  
  When is the last time so many people left a party or endorsed the person from the OTHER party, because their party's candidate was so bad?

  The people running from Trump ... are the ones who stand the most to gain from a Hillary Presidency.
  
  The GOP has become an opposition minority party, focused on making money and controlling portions of the government on broken promises.
  
  They don't have anything they can solve, and Trump creating jobs, building walls, and making America great again ... hurts the power brokers.
  
  Or not.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter