Kim Grinolds finally allows criticism of Emmert
But I heard tonight that AAAAANDY is ripping Emmert and Woodward as frauds. And Kim allows it because both those snake oil salesmen have left town.
As always, turn to Dawgman.com for your Profiles in Courage.
Comments
-
I look forward to the Romar hit piece on dm.c. A year or two after Romar retires.
-
As long as there are no calls for Jenocide. You'll end up in timeout with no warning out here.
-
No one has been harder on Emmert and Woodward than the guys at DM.c. Everyone says so.
-
Jenocide could be a great title for a book.PurpleJ said:As long as there are no calls for Jenocide. You'll end up in timeout with no warning out here.
-
He's right. Censoring your criticsim of Emmert and then allowing AAANDYs Emmert/Poolboy exposee speaks volumes on Kim and the entire Doogman staff. (Hi Fellas!)DerekJohnson said:Kim censored my articles, told me I couldn't criticize Emmert because it would reflect on all Dawgman staff. And Kim angrily denounced me privately and publicly when I dared level broadsides against The Great Man.
But I heard tonight that AAAAANDY is ripping Emmert and Woodward as frauds. And Kim allows it because both those snake oil salesmen have left town.
As always, turn to Dawgman.com for your Profiles in Courage. -
10 people not fishing for kings give a shit about Kim.
-
DerekJohnson said:
Jenocide could be a great title for a donut porn film.PurpleJ said:As long as there are no calls for Jenocide. You'll end up in timeout with no warning out here.
-
But how was Emmert a bad president?
-
Fuck, now you have me wondering if donut porn is an actual thing.TierbsHsotBoobs said:DerekJohnson said:
Jenocide could be a great title for a donut porn film.PurpleJ said:As long as there are no calls for Jenocide. You'll end up in timeout with no warning out here.
-
There were a lot of things going on under Emmert that we knew about but weren't able to say at the time. There is a lot more to running a website than you guys know. We have to balance the interest of our readers with the interest of the University. Let's just say that we are not surprised at what is coming out now. If you look back at what we said we never really endorsed Emmert or Woodward. I just asked the critics out here to tell us how he was a bad President. I didn't say he wasn't a bad president, just wanted some specifics. Some of you need to learn the difference
If you're going to criticize someone put your contact information at the bottom of the post or you won't last long around here. Same as always
-
Fuck that. Emmert has been gone for 6 years. With white guilt, it'll take Kim and company a good decade to allow criticism of Romar...well past most of us fucktards' life expectancy.TTJ said:I look forward to the Romar hit piece on dm.c. A year or two after Romar retires.
-
You sound bitter.
Was it Kim or Fatters that refused your reach around request? -
I post there all the time. Never said I didnt. Said "I didnt pay". Big difference from 3/4ths of you buttsniffers of Kim who lead seperate lives. Its a soap opera with you lifeless fannyflamers.
-
I prefer you telling me to fuck off rather than regurgitate that old chestnut.TheGlove said:You sound bitter.
Was it Kim or Fatters that refused your reach around request? -
DerekJohnson said:
I prefer you telling me to fuck off rather than regurgitate that old chestnut.TheGlove said:You sound bitter.
Was it Kim or Fatters that refused your reach around request?
https://youtu.be/L0MK7qz13bU
