Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Apparently, there's a gay NFL player...

CheersWestDawg
CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam
that's about to come out soon.

Who do you guys think it is?
«134

Comments

  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sven's $20 to whoever guesses correctly.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,197 Founders Club
    Depending on who you believe its anywhere from 1% to 10% of the league as that is the overall number. The over under is 5%
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member Posts: 15,316
    Almost got in a fight in Corvallis when I made fun of Esera Tualo (sp).......
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam
    I bet it's a kicker or punter.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited March 2013
    I don't want to get into a fight with any of you, but I think it's about time. First of all, I applaud the NFL for not allowing teams to ask about sexual orientation during the combine interviews. Why the hell should it matter? If some players have problems with a gay teammate, then THEY are the ones with the problem! If a gay player isn't making inappropriate advances toward a teammate (or breaking some other neutral code of conduct provision), then who cares?

    I was pretty ticked off at Hugh Millen for saying (on KJR) that teams should have the right to ask about this. Uhh...why, Hugh? Should they also ask if a player is a Jew? Muslim? Catholic? How about if he is black but dates white women? Millen also said that some teams have more of an interest because they are in more difficult communities (San Francisco vs. Houston). So, fans will stop coming to games because 1 player is gay?

    Apologies for going on a rant (actually...I'm not sorry). It's just time to get over this. I have plenty of gay friends in DC, and none of them have ever made me feel the least bit uncomfortable.

    Now...allowing whites and blacks to use the same restrooms? That is something I can't tolerate. :-)
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam
    Passion said:

    I don't want to get into a fight with any of you, but I think it's about time. First of all, I applaud the NFL for not allowing teams to ask about sexual orientation during the combine interviews. Why the hell should it matter? If some players have problems with a gay teammate, then THEY are the ones with the problem! If a gay player isn't making inappropriate advances toward a teammate (or breaking some other neutral code of conduct provision), then who cares?

    I was pretty ticked off at Hugh Millen for saying (on KJR) that teams should have the right to ask about this. Uhh...why, Hugh? Should they also ask if a player is a Jew? Muslim? Catholic? How about if he is black but dates white women? Millen also said that some teams have more of an interest because they are in more difficult communities (San Francisco vs. Houston). So, fans will stop coming to games because 1 player is gay?

    Apologies for going on a rant (actually...I'm not sorry). It's just time to get over this. I have plenty of gay friends in DC, and none of them have ever made me feel the least bit uncomfortable.

    Now...allowing whites and blacks to use the same restrooms? That is something I can't tolerate. :-)

    So...who do you think it is?
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    uhhh...probably not Ben Roethlesberger.
  • section8
    section8 Member Posts: 1,581
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Probably a running back. Best play is hitting the two hole.

    Btw. I supports the gays. I support the troops and am against war. I'm also anti poverty. I hate cancer and I want to save the tatas. I'm against global warming and am pro clean water for everyone. I think the income inequity in this country is a travesty and think we should hate 1% because the get rich off the backs of the 99%. I am also anti gmo food. I'm a hit at cocktail parties. Everyone thinks I'm really cool because I show I care about others and that we should share.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    $100 says Passion changed his Facebook picture to the red equal sign. It's the least he could do. So he did that.
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam

    Probably a running back. Best play is hitting the two hole.

    Btw. I supports the gays. I support the troops and am against war. I'm also anti poverty. I hate cancer and I want to save the tatas. I'm against global warming and am pro clean water for everyone. I think the income inequity in this country is a travesty and think we should hate 1% because the get rich off the backs of the 99%. I am also anti gmo food. I'm a hit at cocktail parties. Everyone thinks I'm really cool because I show I care about others and that we should share.

    I bet you're also against hunger, too.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 114,197 Founders Club
    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    That was pretty good
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    That was pretty good
    I'm learning the culture of this website. Gawd help me if it completely takes over my personality.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,562 Founders Club
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    That was pretty good
    I'm learning the culture of this website. Gawd help me if it completely takes over my personality.
    Resistance is futile, young Skywalker
  • WhiskeyDawg
    WhiskeyDawg Member Posts: 406
    Duh. Chip Kelly is now in the NFL.
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    edited March 2013
    I'll keep my answer on the down low.


























    image
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    edited March 2013
    section8 said:

    Tim Tebow?

    Ironically enough, whoever it is is going to become the next Tim Tebow, albeit to a different group of people. Whichever active player is the first to come out is going to cause a media circus and be painted as a national hero no matter how crappy of a football player he may or may not be. He will become bigger than the team, and his story will become bigger than wins and losses.

    Like Tebow he'll obviously have his share of haters, but in this case they'll be mostly relegated to anonymous message boards, private conversations and a few randoms yelling slurs from the stands. No one in the mainstream media will dare say anything but the most glowing things possible, and the home stadium will fill up with signs of support. His jersey sales will increase tenfold at a bare minimum.

    I'm sure it's not him, but the player who would stand the most to gain from coming out is Michael Vick. More likely it's someone fairly anonymous who will never be anonymous again.
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    That was pretty good
    I'm learning the culture of this website. Gawd help me if it completely takes over my personality.
    Some things can't be unlearned.

    HardcoreHusky will invade real life. Believe dat.

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    section8 said:

    Tim Tebow?

    Ironically enough, whoever it is is going to become the next Tim Tebow, albeit to a different group of people. Whichever active player is the first to come out is going to cause a media circus and be painted as a national hero no matter how crappy of a football player he may or may not be. He will become bigger than the team, and his story will become bigger than wins and losses.

    Like Tebow he'll obviously have his share of haters, but in this case they'll be mostly relegated to anonymous message boards, private conversations and a few randoms yelling slurs from the stands. No one in the mainstream media will dare say anything but the most glowing things possible, and the home stadium will fill up with signs of support. His jersey sales will increase tenfold at a bare minimum.

    I'm sure it's not him, but the player who would stand the most to gain from coming out is Michael Vick. More likely it's someone fairly anonymous who will never be anonymous again.
    For the first NFL player that "comes out," his performance on the field is irrelevant, IMO. Rather, it's the courage to step out of the closet in perhaps the most machismo professional sport. There are already ways to recognize great players - MVP, Pro Bowl, increased salary, bonus, etc. I don't quite see anything wrong with positive public recognition of a guy that becomes the first to say he's gay.

    You said the "mainstream media" will not criticize him. Well, why would the media criticize him? If he fumbles the ball, misses tackles, or drops passes, then criticize him like any other player. But criticize just because he's gay?

    Heck, when grinolds, fetters, and eklund eventually reveal their own torrid love triangle, I will still limit my criticism to the way they've destroyed dawgman.com.
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    Passion said:

    section8 said:

    Tim Tebow?

    Ironically enough, whoever it is is going to become the next Tim Tebow, albeit to a different group of people. Whichever active player is the first to come out is going to cause a media circus and be painted as a national hero no matter how crappy of a football player he may or may not be. He will become bigger than the team, and his story will become bigger than wins and losses.

    Like Tebow he'll obviously have his share of haters, but in this case they'll be mostly relegated to anonymous message boards, private conversations and a few randoms yelling slurs from the stands. No one in the mainstream media will dare say anything but the most glowing things possible, and the home stadium will fill up with signs of support. His jersey sales will increase tenfold at a bare minimum.

    I'm sure it's not him, but the player who would stand the most to gain from coming out is Michael Vick. More likely it's someone fairly anonymous who will never be anonymous again.
    For the first NFL player that "comes out," his performance on the field is irrelevant, IMO. Rather, it's the courage to step out of the closet in perhaps the most machismo professional sport. There are already ways to recognize great players - MVP, Pro Bowl, increased salary, bonus, etc. I don't quite see anything wrong with positive public recognition of a guy that becomes the first to say he's gay.

    You said the "mainstream media" will not criticize him. Well, why would the media criticize him? If he fumbles the ball, misses tackles, or drops passes, then criticize him like any other player. But criticize just because he's gay?

    Heck, when grinolds, fetters, and eklund eventually reveal their own torrid love triangle, I will still limit my criticism to the way they've destroyed dawgman.com.
    If that's not an embedded lemon drop, I'm not sure what is.

    Well done, sir.

    I'm just saying that whoever it is this is going to be, by far, the best thing that ever happened to their image.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    You should do more. If you don't do the red symbol, then how will everyone know how progressive and open minded you are? And it doesn't even cost you anything. I'm a bit more action oriented. I'm thinking banging a lesbian to show my solidarity.

    Btw. Use the word snarky here again and you're going to get a time out. Friggin A.

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    Passion said:

    section8 said:

    Tim Tebow?

    Ironically enough, whoever it is is going to become the next Tim Tebow, albeit to a different group of people. Whichever active player is the first to come out is going to cause a media circus and be painted as a national hero no matter how crappy of a football player he may or may not be. He will become bigger than the team, and his story will become bigger than wins and losses.

    Like Tebow he'll obviously have his share of haters, but in this case they'll be mostly relegated to anonymous message boards, private conversations and a few randoms yelling slurs from the stands. No one in the mainstream media will dare say anything but the most glowing things possible, and the home stadium will fill up with signs of support. His jersey sales will increase tenfold at a bare minimum.

    I'm sure it's not him, but the player who would stand the most to gain from coming out is Michael Vick. More likely it's someone fairly anonymous who will never be anonymous again.
    For the first NFL player that "comes out," his performance on the field is irrelevant, IMO. Rather, it's the courage to step out of the closet in perhaps the most machismo professional sport. There are already ways to recognize great players - MVP, Pro Bowl, increased salary, bonus, etc. I don't quite see anything wrong with positive public recognition of a guy that becomes the first to say he's gay.

    You said the "mainstream media" will not criticize him. Well, why would the media criticize him? If he fumbles the ball, misses tackles, or drops passes, then criticize him like any other player. But criticize just because he's gay?

    Heck, when grinolds, fetters, and eklund eventually reveal their own torrid love triangle, I will still limit my criticism to the way they've destroyed dawgman.com.
    If that's not an embedded lemon drop, I'm not sure what is.

    Well done, sir.

    I'm just saying that whoever it is this is going to be, by far, the best thing that ever happened to their image.
    Well, I think if it's Peyton Manning or Brian Urlacher, it's a little more complicated. Their reputations are already pretty awesome. If it's a 3rd string offensive linemen for the Detroit Lions, then I probably agree with you. Where the hell would Jesse Palmer be if he hadn't gone on "The Bachelor?" What a douche...
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited March 2013

    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    You should do more. If you don't do the red symbol, then how will everyone know how progressive and open minded you are? And it doesn't even cost you anything. I'm a bit more action oriented. I'm thinking banging a lesbian to show my solidarity.

    Btw. Use the word snarky here again and you're going to get a time out. Friggin A.

    Most of the lesbians I've seen aren't "bangable." You might as well hook up with Danny Devito.

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    I hope it's Michael Vick. People (and the media) wanted him drawn and quartered for killing dogs with more hate than of he'd killed people. If he turns out to be gay, they will have to embrace him as a hero. That would be fun to see. Coming out would undo all past wrongs. It would be a great PR move. FREE PUB!
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited March 2013
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    Actually, I didn't do the red sign. What I did do, however, is sit back and make snarky comments on the internet about anyone who cared about it. Actually, that's what I do about anyone that cares about anything.

    You should do more. If you don't do the red symbol, then how will everyone know how progressive and open minded you are? And it doesn't even cost you anything. I'm a bit more action oriented. I'm thinking banging a lesbian to show my solidarity.

    Btw. Use the word snarky here again and you're going to get a time out. Friggin A.

    Most of the lesbians I've seen aren't "bangable." You might as well hook up with Danny Devito.

    They are out there if you dig around a bit.

    image
  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,478 Swaye's Wigwam

    Duh. Chip Kelly is now in the NFL.

    I like how Kim has been trying to spread this rumor. He's been running around for the past 4 months telling people that Chip is gay.

    Even if its true, it's truly a case of who gives a shit. If my favorite teams' football coach went 46-7, won 3 conference titles, went to 4 BCS games including the National Championship game, and won a Rose Bowl and popped off.... he could be gayer than Rock Hudson and Greg Louganis put together and I'd be fine with it.

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    I hope it's Michael Vick. People (and the media) wanted him drawn and quartered for killing dogs with more hate than of he'd killed people. If he turns out to be gay, they will have to embrace him as a hero. That would be fun to see. Coming out would undo all past wrongs. It would be a great PR move. FREE PUB!

    Not so fast. I think it'd be a mixed bag. You'd have the animal rights people fighting the gay rights people. Maybe Don King can promote it?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Passion said:

    I hope it's Michael Vick. People (and the media) wanted him drawn and quartered for killing dogs with more hate than of he'd killed people. If he turns out to be gay, they will have to embrace him as a hero. That would be fun to see. Coming out would undo all past wrongs. It would be a great PR move. FREE PUB!

    Not so fast. I think it'd be a mixed bag. You'd have the animal rights people fighting the gay rights people. Maybe Don King can promote it?
    The beauty of it is the gay rights people and the animal rights people are mostly the same people.
  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,328 Founders Club
    Passion said:

    section8 said:

    Tim Tebow?

    Ironically enough, whoever it is is going to become the next Tim Tebow, albeit to a different group of people. Whichever active player is the first to come out is going to cause a media circus and be painted as a national hero no matter how crappy of a football player he may or may not be. He will become bigger than the team, and his story will become bigger than wins and losses.

    Like Tebow he'll obviously have his share of haters, but in this case they'll be mostly relegated to anonymous message boards, private conversations and a few randoms yelling slurs from the stands. No one in the mainstream media will dare say anything but the most glowing things possible, and the home stadium will fill up with signs of support. His jersey sales will increase tenfold at a bare minimum.

    I'm sure it's not him, but the player who would stand the most to gain from coming out is Michael Vick. More likely it's someone fairly anonymous who will never be anonymous again.
    For the first NFL player that "comes out," his performance on the field is irrelevant, IMO. Rather, it's the courage to step out of the closet in perhaps the most machismo professional sport. There are already ways to recognize great players - MVP, Pro Bowl, increased salary, bonus, etc. I don't quite see anything wrong with positive public recognition of a guy that becomes the first to say he's gay.

    You said the "mainstream media" will not criticize him. Well, why would the media criticize him? If he fumbles the ball, misses tackles, or drops passes, then criticize him like any other player. But criticize just because he's gay?

    Heck, when grinolds, fetters, and eklund eventually reveal their own torrid love triangle, I will still limit my criticism to the way they've destroyed dawgman.com.
    Tebow was criticized and mocked for being overly open about his faith. The mainstream media typically goes out of their way to mock Christianity.

    Now if an NFL player comes out, he'll be praised as a hero, full of courage and an inspiration to the world.

    In my opinion, bigging fucking deal for either of them. Tebow sucks as a QB. The gay guy might be an all-pro or a 3rd stringer. As he does his fucking job, who cares which hole he prefers?