Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Who deserves the most credit for the Mariners’ early success?

«13

Comments

  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,131 Founders Club

    Edgar's supplier.

    The name of his restaurant is Edgar's Cantina, not Edgar's Supplier.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,131 Founders Club

    DiPoto for putting together a decent roster.

    Other than Seager, Cruz and Cano, the entire lineup was remade. Smith and Guti were around last year too, and Marte was developing, but basically 3 opening day starters are all that returned from last season. The 1B, DH, and outfield platoons are also more thoughtfully deployed to maximize R vs L match ups. Instead of a few good hitters surrounded by dreck, the entire lineup is producing at a reasonable level. And they actually play defense.

    The rotation is mostly the same, but Miley and Karns have outperformed expectations and their predecessors as back end starters. Despite blowing a few saves already, Cishek is better than Rodney, and the bullpen overall is one of the best in the league (after losing some of the top guys from a year before).

    It's weird to say this about a Mariners team, but the starting rotation is the biggest weakness.

    That's a very thoughtful breakdown, but I would say that in time Cishek and the leadoff spot will prove to be the biggest weaknesses.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    DiPoto for putting together a decent roster.

    Other than Seager, Cruz and Cano, the entire lineup was remade. Smith and Guti were around last year too, and Marte was developing, but basically 3 opening day starters are all that returned from last season. The 1B, DH, and outfield platoons are also more thoughtfully deployed to maximize R vs L match ups. Instead of a few good hitters surrounded by dreck, the entire lineup is producing at a reasonable level. And they actually play defense.

    The rotation is mostly the same, but Miley and Karns have outperformed expectations and their predecessors as back end starters. Despite blowing a few saves already, Cishek is better than Rodney, and the bullpen overall is one of the best in the league (after losing some of the top guys from a year before).

    It's weird to say this about a Mariners team, but the starting rotation is the biggest weakness.

    That's a very thoughtful breakdown, but I would say that in time Cishek and the leadoff spot will prove to be the biggest weaknesses.
    Could be the case. Martin and Marte have had a breakout start to the season, and could be due for a big regression.

    I think Cishek will be fine.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Aoki will probably need to be replaced, and they could use another back end starter for when someone inevitably gets hurt.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,553 Swaye's Wigwam
    Dipoto replacing Jack Z is probably the biggest reason, but Cano is right at the top. I haven't watched a pitch all season, but I know that if Cano was hitting .250 with 1 HR like he was last year, this team would be .500 at best. The Mariners can't afford for him to suck.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 70,131 Founders Club

    DiPoto for putting together a decent roster.

    Other than Seager, Cruz and Cano, the entire lineup was remade. Smith and Guti were around last year too, and Marte was developing, but basically 3 opening day starters are all that returned from last season. The 1B, DH, and outfield platoons are also more thoughtfully deployed to maximize R vs L match ups. Instead of a few good hitters surrounded by dreck, the entire lineup is producing at a reasonable level. And they actually play defense.

    The rotation is mostly the same, but Miley and Karns have outperformed expectations and their predecessors as back end starters. Despite blowing a few saves already, Cishek is better than Rodney, and the bullpen overall is one of the best in the league (after losing some of the top guys from a year before).

    It's weird to say this about a Mariners team, but the starting rotation is the biggest weakness.

    That's a very thoughtful breakdown, but I would say that in time Cishek and the leadoff spot will prove to be the biggest weaknesses.
    Could be the case. Martin and Marte have had a breakout start to the season, and could be due for a big regression.

    I think Cishek will be fine.
    I don't think he throws hard enough and he's always trying to nibble on the outside. I don't see alpha male when he's on the mound.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

    DiPoto for putting together a decent roster.

    Other than Seager, Cruz and Cano, the entire lineup was remade. Smith and Guti were around last year too, and Marte was developing, but basically 3 opening day starters are all that returned from last season. The 1B, DH, and outfield platoons are also more thoughtfully deployed to maximize R vs L match ups. Instead of a few good hitters surrounded by dreck, the entire lineup is producing at a reasonable level. And they actually play defense.

    The rotation is mostly the same, but Miley and Karns have outperformed expectations and their predecessors as back end starters. Despite blowing a few saves already, Cishek is better than Rodney, and the bullpen overall is one of the best in the league (after losing some of the top guys from a year before).

    It's weird to say this about a Mariners team, but the starting rotation is the biggest weakness.

    That's a very thoughtful breakdown, but I would say that in time Cishek and the leadoff spot will prove to be the biggest weaknesses.
    Could be the case. Martin and Marte have had a breakout start to the season, and could be due for a big regression.

    I think Cishek will be fine.
    I don't think he throws hard enough and he's always trying to nibble on the outside. I don't see alpha male when he's on the mound.
    I get that, but Trevor Hoffman didn't throw hard either. As long as guys swing and miss, it doesn't matter what the gun says.

    Cishek's side arm delivery is tough on opponents, especially righties. He doesn't throw hard, but he gets a lot of movement, and you can tell batters are uneasy in the box facing him.

    A few blown saves suck, but every closer blows a few games. It's how they respond that counts. Obviously I'd prefer a guy that threw 100 and scared the shit out of opponents with his breaking ball, but Cishek is doing fine. I agree on the nibbling, but that can be corrected with proper coaching.