thank's hondo!
Comments
-
Actually pelosi didn't admit to not reading it. But nice work regurgitating every false talking point.Southerndawg said:Defending Obamacare is beyond Hondo FS. It's an indefensible piece of legislation that was rammed down the people's throats. It was so massive in scope that batshit crazy speaker Pelosi admitted to not reading it, instead declaring it had to be passed to see what was in it. And people wonder why there's push back.
The law is fucked up but at least give a valid argument. -
Disagree. Since this board loves shitty football analogies: if I'm forced to choose between Sark and Ty and I choose the former, I'm defending Sark?Southerndawg said:You are
-
I'm at least able to keep my doctor...right?
-
Hi there.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. Since this board loves shitty football analogies: if I'm forced to choose between Sark and Ty and I choose the former, I'm defending Sark?Southerndawg said:You are
Those aren't your only options.
Bannon/Fucker AcrossTheStreet From dFlea 2016! -
I like to buy my collision coverage after I wreck my car. Works pretty much the same way.
-
A healthcare platform of free whiskey and opiates to dull the pain of your terminal illness is something I can get on board with.dnc said:
Hi there.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. Since this board loves shitty football analogies: if I'm forced to choose between Sark and Ty and I choose the former, I'm defending Sark?Southerndawg said:You are
Those aren't your only options.
Bannon/Fucker AcrossTheStreet From dFlea 2016! -
The vast majority of Americans agree that insurance companies shouldn't deny patients based on pre existing conditions. Not to mention how they used to be able to cancel people's insurance because of new conditions.Alexis said:I like to buy my collision coverage after I wreck my car. Works pretty much the same way.
You still can't get cancer and decide to pay for insurance and be OK like you are implying. -
No, but you can expect the insurance company to have to pay for all your futile treatment2001400ex said:
The vast majority of Americans agree that insurance companies shouldn't deny patients based on pre existing conditions. Not to mention how they used to be able to cancel people's insurance because of new conditions.Alexis said:I like to buy my collision coverage after I wreck my car. Works pretty much the same way.
You still can't get cancer and decide to pay for insurance and be OK like you are implying. -
@DeathPanelDawg true?!dnc said:
No, but you can expect the insurance company to have to pay for all your futile treatment2001400ex said:
The vast majority of Americans agree that insurance companies shouldn't deny patients based on pre existing conditions. Not to mention how they used to be able to cancel people's insurance because of new conditions.Alexis said:I like to buy my collision coverage after I wreck my car. Works pretty much the same way.
You still can't get cancer and decide to pay for insurance and be OK like you are implying. -
Don James! True?dnc said:
No, but you can expect the insurance company to have to pay for all your futile treatment2001400ex said:
The vast majority of Americans agree that insurance companies shouldn't deny patients based on pre existing conditions. Not to mention how they used to be able to cancel people's insurance because of new conditions.Alexis said:I like to buy my collision coverage after I wreck my car. Works pretty much the same way.
You still can't get cancer and decide to pay for insurance and be OK like you are implying.
