Hillary wins Washington State
Oh wait, there's more.
"On the Democratic side, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton beat Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. She had nearly 54 percent of the vote in Tuesday’s returns in a major reversal — though purely symbolic — from March caucuses, in which Sanders dominated. ....
Democrats are ignoring the result and already allocated delegates based on March caucuses. Despite her win with a much larger primary electorate, Clinton won’t amass any more delegates."
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/wash-primary1/
Comments
-
How much money did that cost the State? What was the point?
-
The Dem primary vote didn't count. The people that voted must be ignorant.
-
greenblood said:
How much money did that cost the State? What was the point?
Both good questions, I'm also waiting for the outrage over allocating all of the delegates to the guy who lost the election.
#Hypocrisy
-
The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
-
I think it proves how uninformed they are, and that even that left wing population is in general still not feeling the Berngreenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
-
GO HUSKIES!greenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
-
Can we get a chinchincredible?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
GO HUSKIES!greenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
-
Did someone die?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
GO HUSKIES!greenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
-
Nobody voted because it is meaningless.Southerndawg said:
I think it proves how uninformed they are, and that even that left wing population is in general still not feeling the Berngreenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
Drawing conclusions from this is FS. -
Nobody voted?ThomasFremont said:
Nobody voted because it is meaningless.Southerndawg said:
I think it proves how uninformed they are, and that even that left wing population is in general still not feeling the Berngreenblood said:The only thing this primary proved was that nearly 1 million people in Washington are willing to waste their time on an irrelevant primary. Thus, they must live sad and pathetic lives.
Drawing conclusions from this is FS.
"While nearly 1.3 million primary votes had been returned to county elections offices as of Tuesday, Washington’s tally won’t have much sway on the 2016 race for the White House."
Try again champ
