sark usc's #1 target
Comments
-
Paul Finebaum is a known SEC troll.
-
-
Hope has been a miserable AND pathetic strategy for a decade.tracker said:
-
My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
-
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
-
The worst possible scenario is USC hiring Peterson from BSU.....we keep Sark......and Wilcox and Sirmon go to BSU
-
thank you, mr. sunshine.HuskyJW said:The worst possible scenario is USC hiring Peterson from BSU.....we keep Sark......and Wilcox and Sirmon go to BSU
-
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
-
Disagree. Petersen wouldn't be great at USC.HuskyJW said:The worst possible scenario is USC hiring Peterson from BSU.....we keep Sark......and Wilcox and Sirmon go to BSU
-
Hope is free. Supervision and Doogery lesson 1.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
-
Not sold on Wilcox? I'm sorry, but youre fucking stupid. UW's d has gone from the worst in the nation to the top 15, and made Hogan look like he was Nunes out there. The fucker threw for 100 yards at home.section8 said:
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
-
What are you going to say when they give up 50 to Oregon?
-
Sark should be fired for giving up 4 special teams td's, because thats the only way Oregon gets fiddy. Cook it.RaceBannon said:What are you going to say when they give up 50 to Oregon?
-
Pat Haden can't possibly be Pat HadenFSjecornel said:Per game day new guy....orgeron worst head coach in history....the dude is paul finebalm
-
MikeDamone said:
My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up. </blo
Lets hire a new coach and go 7-6 with 19 returning starters and the best returning defense in the country. Brilliant! -
Look EVERYONE in here is sold on Wilcox as a DC but to say you aren't sold on him as a head coach is a totally fine and reasonable argument.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not sold on Wilcox? I'm sorry, but youre fucking stupid. UW's d has gone from the worst in the nation to the top 15, and made Hogan look like he was Nunes out there. The fucker threw for 100 yards at home.section8 said:
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
There have been plenty of successful coordinators who turned out to be shitty head coaches.
WIlcox as a DC is a proven DC. Wilcox as a head coach is an unknown. -
That was my fucking point. Ive never claimed he was HC material, just a top 5 national DCHe_Needs_More_Time said:
WIlcox as a DC is a proven DCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not sold on Wilcox? I'm sorry, but youre fucking stupid. UW's d has gone from the worst in the nation to the top 15, and made Hogan look like he was Nunes out there. The fucker threw for 100 yards at home.section8 said:
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
-
I don't know if he's a top 5 national DC. Can he produce one top 10 defense before we anoint him?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That was my fucking point. Ive never claimed he was HC material, just a top 5 national DCHe_Needs_More_Time said:
WIlcox as a DC is a proven DCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not sold on Wilcox? I'm sorry, but youre fucking stupid. UW's d has gone from the worst in the nation to the top 15, and made Hogan look like he was Nunes out there. The fucker threw for 100 yards at home.section8 said:
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
He's a good DC, I'm happy we have. I'll be pissed off if he leaves while happy if Sark were to LEAVE! -
Wilcox has been a successful coordinator at multiple schools in multiple conferences. The odds of him not being a successful head coach are really low. As HC at UO or UW, he'd have the resources to hire a great OC. He essentially would need to find an OC and have a staff of energetic recruiters.
And before SvenFS replies, Its fucktarded to point out a few bad games in his first season. This staff inherited a defense outside of the top 100 that should finish in the top 15 this year. And Shaq is the only guy they recruited. Just wait till they get their own recruits in..could be a top 5 defense. -
I'm sorry I couldn't help but laugh at that line. I can't count how many times I've heard "just wait til coach X gets his own guys in here we'll be top 10 in the nation in this" then it never happens.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Wilcox has been a successful coordinator at multiple schools in multiple conferences. The odds of him not being a successful head coach are really low. As HC at UO or UW, he'd have the resources to hire a great OC. He essentially would need to find an OC and have a staff of energetic recruiters.
And before SvenFS replies, Its fucktarded to point out a few bad games in his first season. This staff inherited a defense outside of the top 100 that should finish in the top 15 this year. And Shaq is the only guy they recruited. Just wait till they get their own recruits in..could be a top 5 defense.
Wilcox appears to be better than these hacks I'll say that. I think eventually Wilcox can become a good head coach but there would be a learning curve. I don't feel like doing that again.
Rather see him tear it up at a smaller school much like the Fresno State head coach is doing then hire him after that. -
Shouldn't a top 5 national DC have something close to a top 5 defense once in his life?PostGameOrangeSlices said:
That was my fucking point. Ive never claimed he was HC material, just a top 5 national DCHe_Needs_More_Time said:
WIlcox as a DC is a proven DCPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Not sold on Wilcox? I'm sorry, but youre fucking stupid. UW's d has gone from the worst in the nation to the top 15, and made Hogan look like he was Nunes out there. The fucker threw for 100 yards at home.section8 said:
This. Just watch him let Wilcox walk out the door and hire some retarded D3 coach to learn on the job again. I'm not totally sold on Wilcox, but I also think that you don't let him walk away.MikeDamone said:My god that would be too good to be true. But the issue is woodward would fuck it up.
-
If you think Wilcox inherited terrible defensive talent, you probably think Sark inherited 0-12 talent too.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Wilcox has been a successful coordinator at multiple schools in multiple conferences. The odds of him not being a successful head coach are really low. As HC at UO or UW, he'd have the resources to hire a great OC. He essentially would need to find an OC and have a staff of energetic recruiters.
And before SvenFS replies, Its fucktarded to point out a few bad games in his first season. This staff inherited a defense outside of the top 100 that should finish in the top 15 this year. And Shaq is the only guy they recruited. Just wait till they get their own recruits in..could be a top 5 defense.
Fuck off. -
It is a stupid line when you are dealing with a hack coach but Sirmon & Tosh have proven to be excellent recruiters. Look at the D recruits from last year. Very strong class from top to bottom. If we win 10 this year the next class should be even better.
-
Recruiting lag theory: Generally speaking, your results from one season show up in the recruiting class a full year after said season.HeretoBeatmyChest said:It is a stupid line when you are dealing with a hack coach but Sirmon & Tosh have proven to be excellent recruiters. Look at the D recruits from last year. Very strong class from top to bottom. If we win 10 this year the 2015 class should be even better.
Having said that, the 2014 class will be solid anyway because those defensive coaches can definitely recruit well.
-
Of course Sark didn't inherit 0-12 talent.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you think Wilcox inherited terrible defensive talent, you probably think Sark inherited 0-12 talent too.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Wilcox has been a successful coordinator at multiple schools in multiple conferences. The odds of him not being a successful head coach are really low. As HC at UO or UW, he'd have the resources to hire a great OC. He essentially would need to find an OC and have a staff of energetic recruiters.
And before SvenFS replies, Its fucktarded to point out a few bad games in his first season. This staff inherited a defense outside of the top 100 that should finish in the top 15 this year. And Shaq is the only guy they recruited. Just wait till they get their own recruits in..could be a top 5 defense.
Fuck off.
Wilcox inherited a defense with above average talent and resurrected its play significantly and immediately. -
In 2011 we kept telling Doogs that the defense wasn't as terrible as they were painting.HeretoBeatmyChest said:
Of course Sark didn't inherit 0-12 talent.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you think Wilcox inherited terrible defensive talent, you probably think Sark inherited 0-12 talent too.HeretoBeatmyChest said:Wilcox has been a successful coordinator at multiple schools in multiple conferences. The odds of him not being a successful head coach are really low. As HC at UO or UW, he'd have the resources to hire a great OC. He essentially would need to find an OC and have a staff of energetic recruiters.
And before SvenFS replies, Its fucktarded to point out a few bad games in his first season. This staff inherited a defense outside of the top 100 that should finish in the top 15 this year. And Shaq is the only guy they recruited. Just wait till they get their own recruits in..could be a top 5 defense.
Fuck off.
Wilcox inherited a defense with above average talent and resurrected its play significantly and immediately.
Still had Sean Parker, Desmond Trufant, Josh Shirley, Danny Shelton and Justin Glenn returning. Plus Timu, Prince, Ducre and Peters were poised to bust out. They also brought in Shaq which helped.
He deserves credit for the turnaround but the defense wasn't as terrible talent wise as was being painted in 2011. -
Mason Foster masked the D problems in 2010. He was making like 17 tackles a game at the end of the season. Jamora and Aieywa really came on at the end of 2010. Losing those 3 guys hurt.
-
Alright, who the fuck hacked into your account?TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Recruiting lag theory: Generally speaking, your results from one season show up in the recruiting class a full year after said season.HeretoBeatmyChest said:It is a stupid line when you are dealing with a hack coach but Sirmon & Tosh have proven to be excellent recruiters. Look at the D recruits from last year. Very strong class from top to bottom. If we win 10 this year the 2015 class should be even better.
Having said that, the 2014 class will be solid anyway because those defensive coaches can definitely recruit well. -
I know it's the elephant in the room but we've still had no Dline injuries and our Dline depth is dogshit. We aren't gonna be this healthy all season
-
Recruiting isn't the problem. Coaching is.
Sark is either Ron Zook or Chan Gailey.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
