#TBT
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
Comments
-
#racetraitor in more ways than one.
-
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 20th Century dawgs and expects every player to be a Gil Dobie #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
-
I like to call players from almost 30 years ago once in a decade
-
I just want to point out that I'm too lazy to go back and find the poasts (hardy har har) where you're praising Sark's work at UW. You're the king of the fucking Doogs and you were the president of the Sark fan club.GrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
Secondly, I'm not a Peterman basher at all but just he said it himself, he just needs to win now, and that's exactly where I stand. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that Pete left plenty of wins on the field the last 2 years. -
Wait, I should go back and find Pumpy's thread where he poasted this and reply there.
I'm going back to sleep. -
Time for a bumpathon.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I just want to point out that I'm too lazy to go back and find the poasts (hardy har har) where you're praising Sark's work at UW. You're the king of the fucking Doogs and you were the president of the Sark fan club.GrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
Secondly, I'm not a Peterman basher at all but just he said it himself, he just needs to win now, and that's exactly where I stand. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that Pete left plenty of wins on the field the last 2 years.
-
Just ask me to pin it. Boobs you worthless cuntTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Time for a bumpathon.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I just want to point out that I'm too lazy to go back and find the poasts (hardy har har) where you're praising Sark's work at UW. You're the king of the fucking Doogs and you were the president of the Sark fan club.GrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
Secondly, I'm not a Peterman basher at all but just he said it himself, he just needs to win now, and that's exactly where I stand. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that Pete left plenty of wins on the field the last 2 years. -
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
I just want to point out that I'm too lazy to go back and find the poasts (hardy har har) where you're praising Sark's work at UW. You're the king of the fucking Doogs and you were the president of the Sark fan club.GrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
Secondly, I'm not a Peterman basher at all but just he said it himself, he just needs to win now, and that's exactly where I stand. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that Pete left plenty of wins on the field the last 2 years.
-
FREE PUB!!1!
-
fixedGrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spotok?OK! -
the nasty tone of the OP has me shaking and about to vomit.
-
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
-
As our former intern, Tommy has training that no mere mortal can receivepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
-
Ironic.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
-
Huh? You know the meaning of irony right?ThomasFremont said:
Ironic.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
-
Yes I do.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Huh? You know the meaning of irony right?ThomasFremont said:
Ironic.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
Clearly, you do not. -
You doin ok little buddy? Pups been kinda hard on you lately. J can handle it but I worry bout you.ThomasFremont said:
Yes I do.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Huh? You know the meaning of irony right?ThomasFremont said:
Ironic.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
Clearly, you do not. -
Funny that you should ask if I am ok, when you are the one that ran and cried to Derek today.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
You doin ok little buddy? Pups been kinda hard on you lately. J can handle it but I worry bout you.ThomasFremont said:
Yes I do.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Huh? You know the meaning of irony right?ThomasFremont said:
Ironic.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
If not for your Pup Pub, you'd have been forgotten and overlooked long ago. No need to thank me tom, youre still irrelevant and forgotten. I just keep you around for comedy material.ThomasFremont said:FREE PUB!!1!
Clearly, you do not.
Have you washed the sand out of your vagina yet? -
I'd also like to point out Pup's logic and counting skills in this thread. Puppy good at everything.GrundleStiltzkin said:Nacho how many times do I have to explain the reasons for Pete's struggles the last 2 years, to field a team that can compete at this level. You aint gettin back on the wagon next year either. Here's Pup's list of fucktarded HH posters who have written Pete off unfairly, criticized his coaching, demanded the unattainable and beaten him up regularly without a clue of the circumstances there within. These fuckholes are officially out as of 5-12-'16, and AINT gettin on the Pup-Pete wagon next year and going forward:
1. J- No hope for this guy. Ditched the dawgs and entire pac12 for the SEC. Traitor of worst kind.
2-. Boobs- Already checked out, trying to crawl back but too late. Dont know how good you have it till its gone babs.
3. Nacho- no clue how college football works, how bad Sark left program, no understanding of strength of this conference and how hard it is to win with Cyler Myress and then true freshmen and sophomores at near every position. Oh, throw in a high schooler to start at QB (and his blind side at Lt and RT). Nacho, you aint ever coming back to Pete's side. These guys are all interchangeable, but Nacho is a candidate #1 for sure
4. PLEsE- new and insignificant
5. Race- Closet Traitor but not surprising. He was spoiled by early 90's dawgs and expects every player to be #90, #8, #5, #4 and #9. Told people then that these guys were once-in-a-decade guys or longer. I go way back with Race which is why I was surprised he jumped on Pete's back with a sledge hammer, but still have faith in him. He's not getting back on Pete's wagon though. You pissed on the wrong coach Race you cunt.
All I have time for today. Ill round out top 10 later. Remember, these Five Fucks arent getting on dawg wagon next year or the next. They all already wrote off Pete. Tommy too insignificant to list so he just honorable mention. I need a list of nobodies next. Tommy ill give you the #1 spot ok?
