Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Patients in Obamacare are sicker and need significantly more medical care than those in employer...

245

Comments

  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778

    PurpleJ said:

    Can I keep my fucking doctor or not?

    Do you like your doctor?
    No he's a baby boomer fag who won't give me an unlimited supply of Percocet and Oxycontin.
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Can I keep my fucking doctor or not?

    Do you like your doctor?
    No he's a baby boomer fag who won't give me an unlimited supply of Percocet and Oxycontin.
    Did he give you an MMJ card? If so he saved you a lot in taxes.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,726 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Can I keep my fucking doctor or not?

    Do you like your doctor?
    No he's a baby boomer fag who won't give me an unlimited supply of Percocet and Oxycontin.
    Did he give you an MMJ card? If so he saved you a lot in taxes.
    There is no medical need to smoke pot. They've had THC in pill forma forever. Just the lie the hemp hooligans used to smoke more and be incarcerated less.
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sledog said:

    2001400ex said:

    PurpleJ said:

    PurpleJ said:

    Can I keep my fucking doctor or not?

    Do you like your doctor?
    No he's a baby boomer fag who won't give me an unlimited supply of Percocet and Oxycontin.
    Did he give you an MMJ card? If so he saved you a lot in taxes.
    There is no medical need to smoke pot. They've had THC in pill forma forever. Just the lie the hemp hooligans used to smoke more and be incarcerated less.
    False: http://www.businessinsider.com/health-benefits-of-medical-marijuana-2014-4

    But then you say you oppose it for the method of intake, not the drug itself?

    Strange.
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,726 Standard Supporter
    edited April 2016
    No I oppose the false pretense used so you can get a card from a dope smoking doc and puff away tax free and lawfully just to get loaded.

    Did you miss the part where the pill may be more effective? Did you even read it? Gupta?
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    Sledog said:

    No I oppose the false pretense used so you can get a card from a dope smoking doc and puff away tax free and lawfully just to get loaded.

    Did you miss the part where the pill may be more effective? Did you even read it? Gupta?

    The pill isn't more effective. There's more to cannabis than just THC. But at the end of the day, smoking, taking a pill, edibles, vapes, etc, it's the same thing. Why do you care how they ingest it?

    And if we are talking false pretense and tax free, why not support federal legalization and taxation? CO and WA are doing great. Or are you one of those people that got brain washed by Ronald Reagan when he told you weed was the worst drug in America???
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    You obviously don't live in Washington state
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    Sledog said:

    No I oppose the false pretense used so you can get a card from a dope smoking doc and puff away tax free and lawfully just to get loaded.

    Did you miss the part where the pill may be more effective? Did you even read it? Gupta?

    You are clearly speaking on something in which you have zero knowledge of. As usual.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    written as if you do... el-oh-el
  • Sledog
    Sledog Member Posts: 38,726 Standard Supporter
    2001400ex said:

    Sledog said:

    No I oppose the false pretense used so you can get a card from a dope smoking doc and puff away tax free and lawfully just to get loaded.

    Did you miss the part where the pill may be more effective? Did you even read it? Gupta?

    You are clearly speaking on something in which you have zero knowledge of. As usual.
    Yeah you didn't know what was in the article YOU posted..... Heck that it backed my position was because the people you were using to prove your point must not have known anything either. I'm guessing you're not a rocket scientist.