Bowl Game rewatch thoughts
Comments
-
WSU's defense was respectable. It was average in most categories with a very good DL. That was a solid offensive performance and would have been very good if we made FG's or scored another TD.RoadDawg55 said:
I want to agree, but all three of those defenses were fucking horrible.Tequilla said:I'm hearing the last 3 games of 2015 show the capabilities of the offense going forward
Oregon St and Southern Miss D's were fucking horrible. -
Doin work against Southeastern Mississippi St is always special.
-
The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
-
You expect quite a bit from JS and crew.
-
PRECISELY my point buttfuck. And linemen are required to release and block downfield on inside WR screens as well. Blocking downfield is the responsibility of both units. A screen play allows linemen to block past the LOS. They dont sit idle on WR screens you fucking idiot.PurpleJ said:
Higher level discussion right here...lolpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.PurpleJ said:I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.
A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better? -
PurpleJ said:
Higher level discussion right here...lolpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.PurpleJ said:I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.
A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better?NeGgaPlEaSe said:
If Pete is who we think he is, he will tear the screen play pages out of the playbook. If we can't complete passes on timing and post routes, shut the goddamn program down.RoadDawg55 said:All PAC 12 for Daniels? Does he even have 25 career receptions? He has talent, but he's kind of becoming a doog legend for such little production.
-
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
-
Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
-
Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit. -
@TurdBufferpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
TRUE???!
-
Who's at the point of attack? That's what I thought.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
PRECISELY my point buttfuck. And linemen are required to release and block downfield on inside WR screens as well. Blocking downfield is the responsibility of both units. A screen play allows linemen to block past the LOS. They dont sit idle on WR screens you fucking idiot.PurpleJ said:
Higher level discussion right here...lolpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
No, it depends on the blocking execution. Id rather have Ross on a well blocked screen than Coleman,Dwash or daniels. WTF J? Who is the halfback you are referring to? Id much rather have a TE screen to Cam Cleeland. But you wouldnt remember.PurpleJ said:I always kept wondering if they know that you can run screens to the halfback instead of the receiver and have a higher success rate.
A screen's success rate depends a lot on the blocking execution? You don't say? Maybe if you had half a brain you'd realize that bubble/tunnel screens employ receivers to do the bulk of the blocking and screens out of the backfield use linemen. Guess who blocks better?
-
I love when you try and talk football tommis. Reminds me of my girlfriend on post game drives from the stadium. (Of course I quickly tell her to shut her hole)ThomasFremont said:
Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit. -
Dazzle us with your Kim fed excuse for no longer running the ball in that game after marching down the fucking field on 4 straight run plays.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
I love when you try and talk football tommis. Reminds me of my girlfriend on post game drives from the stadium. (Of course I quickly tell her to shut her hole)ThomasFremont said:
Yes, that explains how the run was working against Cal and then we? stopped running the ball. The talent...puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Subpar playcalling is a result of subpar or inexperienced talent. The talent aint subpar so that leaves 1. Cant buff a turd...Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
You may be right. I'm not quite convinced there's enough talent to overcome subpar play calling.HFNY said:The offense is the last piece of the puzzle. Special teams and roster balance / depth are much better and the defense has been among the best in the Pac-12. I expect the offense to be in the top half of the Pac-12 in 2016 which means the Huskies should finally be relevant in November again.
Fuck off back to Doogman with this shit.
We're waiting...
