Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Former head of pac-12 refs comments on Kevin Smith's catch.

Passion
Passion Member Posts: 4,622
edited October 2013 in Hardcore Husky Board
"Don't agree with the rev in Stan-UW, not indisputable."

No shit fuckhead. Who the fuck trained the current crop of idiots?
· Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
«1345

Comments

  • Your_Mom
    Your_Mom Member Posts: 393
    Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    Your_Mom said:

    Agree. And what about that BS call on the clean hit during the kickoff return (or whatever return type it was)

    Both of those calls were such homer calls. What bullshit. UW should lodge formal complaints to the conference, of course larry scott only cares about california schools so it'll be pointless.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • greenblood
    greenblood Member Posts: 14,566
    The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    greenblood said:

    The catch call was clear to me. But that kickoff return block call was the most pussified shit I had seen in a long time. But not to be outdone, Sark reclaims his perch with a nice end game cry.

    All of this is true.

    The Pac-12 office confirmed the reversal today, because the ball hit the fucking ground.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    edited October 2013
    The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

    Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

    Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

    It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    The catch call the rule on reviews is it has to be conclusive.

    Had they called it incomplete you guys would be correct. However, the call on the field was a completion. It wasn't conclusive evidence to over turn it.

    Now did that cost UW the game? No it didn't. Would UW had won had they made that coach? Who really knows? It's not like the Huskies have Folk as their kicker so you still had a good 25 yards to go if not more to feel comfortable with the kick.

    It is okay to say the call was wrong to overturn it AND point out that UW fucked themselves way before that call so it shouldn't have came down to that.

    For the 781st time, there is conclusive evidence of the football on the ground. That's conclusive evidence to overturn in this case.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,707 Founders Club
    More importantly if we complain about it online for another week or two they will overturn the game result, 2005seahawksFS
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Reduce, reuse, recycle:

    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited October 2013
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reduce, reuse, recycle:

    image

    Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

    The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

    Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 0
    Passion said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Reduce, reuse, recycle:

    image

    Bullshit. Your photo shows nothing, and frankly is awful. His left arm does not end at the elbow (as it seems to in your photo). And look at the right side of the football on the ground. That appears to be a glove underneath the ball. Third, the ball isn't even on the ground yet in your photo.

    The referees on the ground had a much better vantage point than the idiots up in the booth who, at best, had this grainy photo to look at that proves nothing.

    Lastly, I'll take the word of the former head of pac-12 referees over a guy that wants to say anything that "pleases" oregon fans. Just go to autzen and start sucking dicks for free.
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter