Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Tina Fey Calls Out ‘Hollywood Bullshit'
Comments
-
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example
-
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
Jump off of it.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
you sure?greenblood said:
Are you saying Hollywood doesn't live how it preaches?Sledog said:Whats funnier is DeCaprio fling all over in a private jet, renting a huge yacht and having 4 big ass houses! I guess all his stuff must run on unicorn farts! Global warming's a myth in my book but to believe it's the greatest threat to man and then use more fossil fuels than a few hundred people would is asinine. He's liberal so therefore not a hypocrite.
Global warming is real. What is being argued is to what effect do humans play in this. Many scientists theorize that Venus used to be a lot like Earth until an out of control green house effect turned it into what it is today. Of course, that wasn't man made, so is Earth just gradually heading into that direction naturally, and are we speeding it up? If it's happening naturally, obviously the point then means, we really don't have control over it. That's the argument. -
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
I keep waiting for "the earth is in a 17 year cooling period" from you.Sledog said:
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
Why bother? It's now "climate change" a name that can be used to take more earnings from working folks is just that, a name. Another scam. Nothing more. I like the middle ages hockey stick better. Must have been all those fossil fuels they burned..............2001400ex said:
I keep waiting for "the earth is in a 17 year cooling period" from you.Sledog said:
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
This is a really disappointing thread.
Not one 'wood hit' for Tina Fey.
Shameful really. -
Oddly,, only when dressed as Palin.PurpleThrobber said:This is a really disappointing thread.
Not one 'wood hit' for Tina Fey.
Shameful really. -
Do you have anything of actual substance to say? I mean you sound like a copy paste from Limpdicks website.Sledog said:
Why bother? It's now "climate change" a name that can be used to take more earnings from working folks is just that, a name. Another scam. Nothing more. I like the middle ages hockey stick better. Must have been all those fossil fuels they burned..............2001400ex said:
I keep waiting for "the earth is in a 17 year cooling period" from you.Sledog said:
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
I know, right?2001400ex said:
Oddly,, only when dressed as Palin.PurpleThrobber said:This is a really disappointing thread.
Not one 'wood hit' for Tina Fey.
Shameful really. -
Just as much substance as you . Been to Limpdick? Whatever that is.2001400ex said:
Do you have anything of actual substance to say? I mean you sound like a copy paste from Limpdicks website.Sledog said:
Why bother? It's now "climate change" a name that can be used to take more earnings from working folks is just that, a name. Another scam. Nothing more. I like the middle ages hockey stick better. Must have been all those fossil fuels they burned..............2001400ex said:
I keep waiting for "the earth is in a 17 year cooling period" from you.Sledog said:
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
http://www.universetoday.com/22577/venus-greenhouse-effect/Dick_B said:
you sure?greenblood said:
Are you saying Hollywood doesn't live how it preaches?Sledog said:Whats funnier is DeCaprio fling all over in a private jet, renting a huge yacht and having 4 big ass houses! I guess all his stuff must run on unicorn farts! Global warming's a myth in my book but to believe it's the greatest threat to man and then use more fossil fuels than a few hundred people would is asinine. He's liberal so therefore not a hypocrite.
Global warming is real. What is being argued is to what effect do humans play in this. Many scientists theorize that Venus used to be a lot like Earth until an out of control green house effect turned it into what it is today. Of course, that wasn't man made, so is Earth just gradually heading into that direction naturally, and are we speeding it up? If it's happening naturally, obviously the point then means, we really don't have control over it. That's the argument.
Here's some information for you to look at. If you look at other articles, you'll see that they believe this to be a natural occurrence because of it's proximity to the sun. Mercury doesn't have this issue, because it has no atmosphere.
Many scientists believe that Earth will have the same ending in about 1 billion years. This will be due to the sun increasing in size as it progresses into a Red Giant, shortening the distance of it to Earth. When that happens, many scientists believe that Mars would then be in the habitable zone.
But if you want to believe Venus was made like it was by past extraterrestrials to strengthen your argument then go for it. I think I'll stick to science on this one.
I do believe humans have an impact though to climate change. However, since the 1980's America has led the way to environmental awareness. Countries like China and India, do not follow these same concerns. China especially, creates more carbon dioxide than all developed countries put together.
Everything has a cost/benefit analysis. The cost of America furthering it's control on carbon emissions is huge compared to the environmental benefit on a global scale if China and India continue to lead the way in carbon pollutants. Basically, it would be like using a garden hose to put out a forest fire.
China, India, and other large offenders also need to be on board, and are not. Isolating it to a select few nations like the US and the UK, creates a large economic disadvantage to us and doesn't do much to solve the problem. Keep this mind: Once China gets to a certain point, winds and currents will eventually push their environmental problems here, of which we'll have no recourse.
If other industrial countries like China don't follow suit, we're wasting time and money. -
Clearly you don't get it.Sledog said:
Just as much substance as you . Been to Limpdick? Whatever that is.2001400ex said:
Do you have anything of actual substance to say? I mean you sound like a copy paste from Limpdicks website.Sledog said:
Why bother? It's now "climate change" a name that can be used to take more earnings from working folks is just that, a name. Another scam. Nothing more. I like the middle ages hockey stick better. Must have been all those fossil fuels they burned..............2001400ex said:
I keep waiting for "the earth is in a 17 year cooling period" from you.Sledog said:
Just look at many of the reports RIF. Of course disregard all those emails saying don't put in that data it will ruin our model! Lie!2001400ex said:
Oh, you were being serious? Holy fuck. Well, I guess I need to learn that scientists only have jobs if they project the earth is warmer. And scientists clearly are in control of where everyone puts thermometers. I mean, they went out to the airport's and moved them from open fields right next to the AC units. Then, they ensured to run the AC units all winter.Sledog said:
Yeah I have a bridge you need to buy.2001400ex said:
Wwooosssshhhh.Sledog said:
It pays for all those scientists who won't get paid if it doesn't keep getting warmer! So to keep their jobs they fudge numbers ignore data that disproves their theories and put temperature data collection gauges near A/C heat exchangers. It's called job security.RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one in denial here. Neither of you have refuted one sentence of my argument because you can't and you know it. Regardless of the climate changing and what is causing it and what can be done about it you cannot justify the very real current cost of jacking up gas, coal, and electric power that directly fucks the poor TODAY. There is nothing theoretical about it.TurdBuffer said:Race: You're a climate change denier. Just own it and leave it at that. Spare the suffering poor stuff. If you really cared about that, you wouldn't support sitting on your hands until the last 2 or 3 scientists on earth finally come around to it's validity. It's too convenient to be believable that your concerns about the poor drive your ideology. If you want to keep making that argument, go ahead. But it just doesn't fly.
this isn't about clean air. I have no problem with that. It's about imposing costs for something that you can't show a benefit for. Just some maybe down the road the city is going to flood or not. That's bull shit and you know it.
It is not trolling its a fact. This is fucking the poor for no reason. It is the typical elitist bulls shit that defines the modern left. The poor don't care about what they MIGHT face in the future. They care about what they are going to do today.
I don't give a shit what you beleive about me, tell me how it isn't fucking them. California has higher gas prices for clean air which is reasonable and has worked. Then they tack on a .60 cent a gallon global warming tax that nobody knows where the money goes and what it does. That is but one example -
#HotClimateTalk
-
-
-
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.Sledog said: -
I guess I'm in the middle. Better to be safe than sorry but also not be stupid.
The USA is doing a pretty good job in moving towards natural gas (while being more vigilant about methane leaks when fracking), wind, and solar while phasing out coal (the dirtiest of the all...basically the Sasha Grey of power production).
China and India will be getting in line...partially due to declining arable land and partially due to citizen complaints of terrible pollution (acid rain, spoiled bodies of water, suffocating smog, etc).
China is hurting badly due to overcapacity and bad debts in the steel / coal sector anyway though India needs to get its act together faster if it wants to take advantage of low oil prices to reinvest in their non-oil infrastructure and power. -
Free Pub!!!!doogsinparadise said:
That's a fucktarded metaphor.GrundleStiltzkin said:
I'm hearing the science is settled.doogsinparadise said:
Nearly all climate scientists agree that it's man-made, but I'm going to listen to some Cuog on a message board. Sure.salemcoog said:doogsinparadise said:Give lower earners a tax credit then to make up for the (slightly) higher prices they would face at the pump.
Proving it will help of course is impossible until you try it, but that doesn't seem to stop innovation in tech and pharma, etc.
Yes!!!! Throw Tax credits and Government Mandates at the problem. Always an effective method of achieving a desired result. Warming is real. It may be man made. It may not be but charging the poor American working stiff trying to get to work and maybe take the family to the park or the woods won't even put a scratch in the level of Co2 emissions on this big blue marble. Assuming that Co2 is the problem.
But libtards will feel good because they can say they did something as they cruise their electric car which is probably half powered by coal plants silently down the road.
But what does the post have to do with jumping up and down Screaming that WE HAVE TO DO SOMETHING NOW!!!!HFNY said:I guess I'm in the middle. Better to be safe than sorry but also not be stupid.
The USA is doing a pretty good job in moving towards natural gas (while being more vigilant about methane leaks when fracking), wind, and solar while phasing out coal (the dirtiest of the all...basically the Sasha Grey of power production).
China and India will be getting in line...partially due to declining arable land and partially due to citizen complaints of terrible pollution (acid rain, spoiled bodies of water, suffocating smog, etc).
China is hurting badly due to overcapacity and bad debts in the steel / coal sector anyway though India needs to get its act together faster if it wants to take advantage of low oil prices to reinvest in their non-oil infrastructure and power. -
Is this a cached page? A whoosh? You can't still be arguing this point.
-
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.2001400ex said:
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.Sledog said: -
This is the stupidest fucking argument of them all.Sledog said:
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.2001400ex said:
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.Sledog said:
If you are making the money argument, you're doing it wrong. -
Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.Sledog said:
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.2001400ex said:
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.Sledog said: -
It's much easier to sit back and deny, deny, deny, than to prove a scientific theory. Yet the deniers pretend they're equivalent. So some climate scientists got ahead of themselves and over-stated their cases. It's not right, but that shit happens, and it got corrected. But, because some scientists fudged does not, ipso facto, invalidate the entire field or theory, especially with mounds of supportive data and research. Yet, confirmation bias enters the picture and people then extract from one example to conclude it's a complete fraud. Not exactly empirical or scientific, yet politically extremely effective. Obviously.
-
The deniers need only use the data the liars have. Simple stuff.2001400ex said:
Your news source must be scientists studying global warming for free.Sledog said:
Lots of scientists disagree with the global warming crap. The collusion that's pulling down all the grant money has been caught red handed fudging the numbers, the deniers haven't.2001400ex said:
The best part is you blast scientists for being paid off about global warming. Then link to two sites that are paid to paint a picture of climate change as a myth.Sledog said:
