F3 still sticking to his claim that Price can't improvise.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

chuck said:

I actually argued on Fetters' side on DM.c when he started that topic during the Boise game. I wasn't thrilled to do it but I was thinking the same thing at the time.

Price got into the rut last year where, every time he chose to move around, he moved to the wrong place and got in worse trouble. He did it a couple of times in the first half against Boise, then turned it around in the second half.

He was a good scrambler before he got battered in 2012 and seems to have found it again.

He was completing over 75% of his passes in the first half against Boise. I don't get why any UW fan who doesn't have an agenda would even begin to rip on Price after that half.

It's pretty simple. He left the pocket a couple of times and looked bad doing it. His completion percentage at that early stage of the game doesn't have anything to do with it. The game was still in doubt at that point. It was the first game of the year. A guy does a couple of things wrong and I can overreact with the best of them.

I sure as hell didn't have an agenda. I stayed in Prices corner all through last year and am still there. I was just agreeing with an observation that seemed valid at the time. I've always thought of Price as a better pocket guy who was a marginal runner anyways, so criticizing his improv skills didn't seem that damning to me.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

The game was in doubt because Sark's RZ play calling was spotty on two drives resulting in only 3 points.

Yep, no doubt, but the fact that you feel the need to say so indicates you're missing the point. Focus on the topic at hand.

Note that I'm only speaking for me here. Fetters does have an agenda.