Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Pat Haden on playoff selection committee? WHAT THE FLYIN FUCK?
puppylove_sugarsteel
Member Posts: 9,133
He's been an AD for a only a few years. Who's dick he suck to get that gig. Conference Commissioners would be a pure unbiased committee source. This 4-team playoff is a fuckshow already. Makes obama's minoritycare look seamless. I'd Hate to be UCLA at 12-1. Better be some fucking transparency! !!
Comments
-
For once, I actually agree with you on something related to football.
-
I like that you said "minoritycare," even though that was racist.puppylove_sugarsteel said:He's been an AD for a only a few years. Who's dick he suck to get that gig. Conference Commissioners would be a pure unbiased committee source. This 4-team playoff is a fuckshow already. Makes obama's minoritycare look seamless. I'd Hate to be UCLA at 12-1. Better be some fucking transparency! !!
-
Commissioners only. I agree
-
They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up. -
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up. -
There's going to be a large enough cross section to eliminate most bias.greenblood said:
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up. -
What about Oregon/Stanford last year, and replace Haden with Oregon's AD (wouldn't be Stanford's, he could give two shits about sports)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's going to be a large enough cross section to eliminate most bias.greenblood said:
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up. -
Oregon's AD would be asked to leave the room when Oregon was discussed, just like they do in basketball.greenblood said:
What about Oregon/Stanford last year, and replace Haden with Oregon's AD (wouldn't be Stanford's, he could give two shits about sports)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's going to be a large enough cross section to eliminate most bias.greenblood said:
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up.
By the way, Stanford was the EASY choice between those two teams last year.
Scoreboard. -
I agree there.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon's AD would be asked to leave the room when Oregon was discussed, just like they do in basketball.greenblood said:
What about Oregon/Stanford last year, and replace Haden with Oregon's AD (wouldn't be Stanford's, he could give two shits about sports)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's going to be a large enough cross section to eliminate most bias.greenblood said:
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up.
By the way, Stanford was the EASY choice between those two teams last year.
Scoreboard.
Pac 12 might be a bad example because with a 9 game conference schedule with 12 teams, you almost always have head to head. But lets say in the SEC you have 14 teams with only 8 conference games, that could be where the problems lie. But I guess, that is their problem. But you see where I am getting at? -
I see the problem.greenblood said:
I agree there.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Oregon's AD would be asked to leave the room when Oregon was discussed, just like they do in basketball.greenblood said:
What about Oregon/Stanford last year, and replace Haden with Oregon's AD (wouldn't be Stanford's, he could give two shits about sports)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
There's going to be a large enough cross section to eliminate most bias.greenblood said:
When you have 68 teams, it makes you look like a fuck head if you complain that you were #69. However, when you are only selecting 4 teams, bias needs to be more controlled.TierbsHsotBoobs said:They have ADs on the basketball committee now.
Shut the fuck up.
By the way, Stanford was the EASY choice between those two teams last year.
Scoreboard.
Pac 12 might be a bad example because with a 9 game conference schedule with 12 teams, you almost always have head to head. But lets say in the SEC you have 14 teams with only 8 conference games, that could be where the problems lie. But I guess, that is their problem. But you see where I am getting at?
The same problem exists in basketball. It's not perfect, but it beats the shit out of the BCS.
LIFPO.
