5 Reasons *Our* Spartans beat Alabama
Comments
-
"I can't see!"ThomasFremont said:
Sweet dreamsPostGameOrangeSlices said:
thisThomasFremont said:
Maybe he's getting sick of all the notifications.PurpleJ said:
Agreed. Deleting threads is Kim territory, but considering that PGOS posted that I am not surprised. At all.ThomasFremont said:
Disagree. Another classic for the vault.PostGameOrangeSlices said:Derek please delete this thread now.
CHRIST
and the Bama avatars make my eyes bleed.
along with PLSS' poasts
and The Fire Marshall's
-
Bama is going to plunger USC. They have five star talent that are young back ups. They will be coached up. Alabama reloads. USC is way too soft.
-
Is this still on?
-
PostGameOrangeSlices said:
A lot of the bowls were against shitty teams.no_uh said:Late double down by puppy as the SEC continues to own the bowls... Can't say it wasn't expected.
Still impressive though. I'm looking at you UCLA.
Well thanks for adding a few truths billy, even though I just said the same thing, andd have been for many years, but at least 1 othe r person sees what ive been pounding into the sheep herd here, and the sewing circle at dawgman for 20 years.. HangFire Bill gets it. Thats 2 of us here at HH. I expect that number to increase exponentially as people start to see the light.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:
Pretty easy to win a NC when you two teams in your conference play each othertheciscoshow said:
Yeah those 7 straight NT's were all hype! lolFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Yeah, but the avatar...Dardanus said:
I'm not always right and have never claimed to be. I thought Oklahoma would beat Clemson rather easily.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You too Dardanus? wow...
But to discredit a good team because they are in the SEC and therefore get more credit and recognition by national media (which is partly earned and partly because it drives ratings) is as dumb as blindly supporting any team or conference while ignoring facts to the contrary.
I picked Bammer because they're a good team with a good coach. That doesn't mean the SEC hasn't been overrated, overhyped, and has received some bogus credit over the last 10 years...
Go look up SEC Heismans and NCs vs. other conferences from 2006-2015 vs. 1970-2005 newb. Then look up SEC TV contracts. Then see if you can piece it together. -
8 out of 10
-
Nice retortPurpleJ said:
You wrote a lot. Fag.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Listen cisco you spawned out new fish. The SEC was auto-placed in those 7 bcs bowls. Odds were pretty good theyd win them when there were 8 teams from other conferences, licking their chops for a shot at the SEC, but sitting home because their respective AD's chose not to play 4 FCS schools in non conference play.theciscoshow said:
Yeah those 7 straight NT's were all hype! lolFire_Marshall_Bill said:
Yeah, but the avatar...Dardanus said:
I'm not always right and have never claimed to be. I thought Oklahoma would beat Clemson rather easily.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:You too Dardanus? wow...
But to discredit a good team because they are in the SEC and therefore get more credit and recognition by national media (which is partly earned and partly because it drives ratings) is as dumb as blindly supporting any team or conference while ignoring facts to the contrary.
I picked Bammer because they're a good team with a good coach. That doesn't mean the SEC hasn't been overrated, overhyped, and has received some bogus credit over the last 10 years...
As puppy duly noted, on countless occasions, the SEC was the minority in championships won over the last 40 years. Magically they found themselves in 7 straight bcs "championship" games, one against each other.
Basically, Alabama had to win 1 difficult game a year to be in the silver spoon championship game, with a red-carpet reception. Beat Auburn (after playing an fcs tune-up g a me vs Charelston Southern prior, and they were in (didnt matter how good Auburn was). Teams like Stanford were playing Oregon and Notre Dame in week 11 and 12.
Bama's starters are all rested, healthy because they didnt have to play vs fcs teams, while their depth got significant and important playing time prior to their rivalry game vs 6-6 Auburn, and an auto bcs bid.
Now that 4 conferences get an actual opportunity, the SEC just lost their inherent advantage of the corrupt bcs past..
Mark my words, despite the outcome of Clemson-Alabama, you will see the SEC average out like the prior 30 years before their 7-straight bcs freebie titles.
If Auburn, Alabama and LSU actually traveled to solid power 5 stadiums out of conference, they wouldnt be 12-1 every single year, with a free ride to title. Other conferences earn the trip, Alabama just has to win 1 big game a year and theyre in. So cut the shit cissy, I aint buying it. -
-
Hey J. The pac 12 and sec have exact same bowl win % over last 2 years. The difference? The SEC went 2-5 vs ranked teams last year, the pac 12 went 5-1. Hardy har. Remember too, oregon and asu beat their respective teams this year which would have given pac12 clear nod (remember too the pac12 has 2 less bowl eligable teams. ) However flukes got in the way of reality.
Its ok to declare the pac12 the better conference. The sta t s and facts say so, but if you want to believe what arbitrary and senseless ESPN sta t s tell you go right ahead. Puppy knows better (hence HH knows too). -
Blowing a 31 point lead is not a flukepuppylove_sugarsteel said:Hey J. The pac 12 and sec have exact same bowl win % over last 2 years. The difference? The SEC went 2-5 vs ranked teams last year, the pac 12 went 5-1. Hardy har. Remember too, oregon and asu beat their respective teams this year which would have given pac12 clear nod (remember too the pac12 has 2 less bowl eligable teams. ) However flukes got in the way of reality.
Its ok to declare the pac12 the better conference. The sta t s and facts say so, but if you want to believe what arbitrary and senseless ESPN sta t s tell you go right ahead. Puppy knows better (hence HH knows too). -
Last time I checked everyone here was changing to a Bama pic and chanting SEC SEC SEC. Purpy knows better (hence HH knows too).puppylove_sugarsteel said:Hey J. The pac 12 and sec have exact same bowl win % over last 2 years. The difference? The SEC went 2-5 vs ranked teams last year, the pac 12 went 5-1. Hardy har. Remember too, oregon and asu beat their respective teams this year which would have given pac12 clear nod (remember too the pac12 has 2 less bowl eligable teams. ) However flukes got in the way of reality.
Its ok to declare the pac12 the better conference. The sta t s and facts say so, but if you want to believe what arbitrary and senseless ESPN sta t s tell you go right ahead. Puppy knows better (hence HH knows too).
