Fire Petersen Hire Chip
Comments
-
J: That's the Quote of the Year! I'd give it two awesomes if I could.PurpleJ said:I would have fired Don James...
Okay, NOW I'm going to get drunk. I promise. -
Whoosh I guess. In reality I would have complained loudly but given DJ the standard 3 years. He would have shut me right up after that.TurdBuffer said:
J: That's the Quote of the Year! I'd give it two awesomes if I could.PurpleJ said:I would have fired Don James...
Okay, NOW I'm going to get drunk. I promise. -
J: It works whether serious or sarcasm. Hence: Quote of the year. For <5 hrs.
-
I
He won the Pac 12 with Masoli you weapon.TurdBuffer said:
But we can't emphasize a very good Oregon team with Marcus Mariota. Logical consistency is dumb. Okay.RoadDawg55 said:
Chip took his talent, won Pac 12 championships and went to a natty. He won two Pac 12 titles over very good Stanford teams with Andrew Luck. This is one of the dumbest threads, at least for a serious one, in the history of HardcoreHusky.TurdBuffer said:
That "Ferrarri" that was "handed" to him didn't start at UO until CKs final season.
-
UW went 8-4 in his third year.TurdBuffer said:Don James was 11-11 (6-5, 5-6) after 22 games, then went 10-2 in year three and won the Rose Bowl. But I'll never understand why his ass wasn't fired after that losing season his 2nd year. Made no sense.
You're a fucking idiot who can't get his facts right to support an argument. If your main supporter in this thread is PLSSFS, you've already lost. -
^^^^^Since the rest of you fags are assburglar'ing with the Chipster, I'm going on record as saying 'wood hit" these three honeys.TurdBuffer said:
Be original. Pandering sycophants are boring. -
@CFetters_Nacho_Lover: So I pulled that from a site that had it wrong, as if it makes any difference. But to you, and number monkeys like you, it changes everything. James indeed should've been fired after year 2, didn't win a Rose Bowl his third year, didn't go 6-1 in conference after starting 1-3, and wasn't selected as National Coach of the Year that year. Throw it all out because it wasn't 10-2, but in fact 8-4, and fuck the Don James era entirely. It should've never happened because he was 11-11 after two years. That's your point, right? Talk about doogs, idiots and whooshes.
-
Yes that's exactly what he's saying.ThomasFremont said:
Funny how the blind hatred of all things Oregon amplifies the doog in some posters.RoadDawg55 said:
I don't really have a dog in this fight, but you are a true moron if you believe Petersen wasn't set up nicely at Boise State. Like what Chip did at Oregon, Petersen took Boise to a new level, but he inherited a talented team (for their conference) that expected and knew how to win. They already had a winning culture in place before Petersen.TurdBuffer said:I'll stick with coaches who actually prove they can do jack shit when the fucking table isn't set for them like it was for Fat Little Chip. Chip stepped onto the top floor of the program Belotti and Co. began building long before he was around, while Sugar Daddy Phil Knight wrote the 8 figure checks. They were elevating and kicking our ass while Belotti was still the coach, and all Chip did was garnish the already bountiful plate with his up-tempo shit. Big fucking Deal. Ever heard of Sam Wyche? Same shit. In this case, the difference was the caliber of the athletes, not the coach. Most programs couldn't compete with Phil Knight's bucks, which have poured into Eugene's football facilities and faggy-chic uniforms non-stop for a decade. Oh, and just a sample of players would include Mariota, LaMichael James, Blount, DeAnthony Thomas, Freeman, Benoit, Byner, Tyner, Marshall, and many other players who were three deep at U of O and would've started at most other Pac12 schools. Fucking Yankees of the Pac12, and some of you think Fat Little Chip is a great coach because he didn't fuck it up?
Oregon had some good players under Chip, but not many guys who are stars in the NFL. He was a great coach there.
Fuck conference championships and BCS bowls, I wanna go 7-6 forever so we can talk about which 14 year old boy will be our savior in 2020. -
-
No, my point was that you're a fucking idiot who is using incorrect information to make your argument.TurdBuffer said:@CFetters_Nacho_Lover: So I pulled that from a site that had it wrong, as if it makes any difference. But to you, and number monkeys like you, it changes everything. James indeed should've been fired after year 2, didn't win a Rose Bowl his third year, didn't go 6-1 in conference after starting 1-3, and wasn't selected as National Coach of the Year that year. Throw it all out because it wasn't 10-2, but in fact 8-4, and fuck the Don James era entirely. It should've never happened because he was 11-11 after two years. That's your point, right? Talk about doogs, idiots and whooshes.
I never said I'd fire James after year 2 or his 1-3 start in year 3 nor I am saying to fire Petersen and hire Kelly. At the same time, I'm also not a fucking idiot who thinks that Kelly only succeeded at Oregon because of Bellotti, Phil Knight & Nike or because of Marriota. I think Kelly succeeded at Oregon because he's a good fucking coach and oh by the way, good college coaches bring in great talent and use it properly in their respective systems much like Kelly did at Oregon and I hope Petersen will do at UW.
Good day.
