Which Season was Better? 2014 or 2015?
So, which season are you happier with? Below are the outcomes.
2014 (8-6, 4-5):
Conference Wins: at Cal (31-7); at Colorado (38-23); Oregon St (37-13); at Wazzu (31-13)
Non-conference Wins: at Hawaii (17-16); EWU (59-52); Illinois (44-19); Georgia St (45-14)
Conference Losses: Stanford (20-13); at Oregon (45-20); Arizona St (24-10); UCLA (44-30); at Arizona (27-26)
Non-conference Losses: Oklahoma St (30-22)
2015 (7-6, 4-5):
Conference Wins: at USC (17-12); Arizona (49-3); at Oregon St (52-7); Wazzu (45-10)
Non-conference Wins: Sac St (49-0); Utah St (31-17); Southern Miss (44-31)
Conference Losses: Cal (30-24); Oregon (26-20); at Stanford (31-14); Utah (34-23); at Arizona St (27-17)
Non-conference Losses: at Boise St (16-13)
Which Season was Better? 2014 or 2015? 29 votes
Comments
-
2015 (7-6, 4-5)4-5>4-5, everyone says so.
-
Neither
-
2015 (7-6, 4-5)We already did better than last year by making the natty. I'm confident we can take home the title this year.
-
Invalid Pole. Question should be which season sucked more?whatshouldicareabout said:Only two options here. No Janet Reno or the Field or other joke options. Not even even because everyone would pick even.
So, which season are you happier with? Below are the outcomes.
2014 (8-6, 4-5):
Conference Wins: at Cal (31-7); at Colorado (38-23); Oregon St (37-13); at Wazzu (31-13)
Non-conference Wins: at Hawaii (17-16); EWU (59-52); Illinois (44-19); Georgia St (45-14)
Conference Losses: Stanford (20-13); at Oregon (45-20); Arizona St (24-10); UCLA (44-30); at Arizona (27-26)
Non-conference Losses: Oklahoma St (30-22)
2015 (7-6, 4-5):
Conference Wins: at USC (17-12); Arizona (49-3); at Oregon St (52-7); Wazzu (45-10)
Non-conference Wins: Sac St (49-0); Utah St (31-17); Southern Miss (44-31)
Conference Losses: Cal (30-24); Oregon (26-20); at Stanford (31-14); Utah (34-23); at Arizona St (27-17)
Non-conference Losses: at Boise St (16-13)
-
2014 (8-6, 4-5)2014 because it was year 1, new system new culture etc etc, to be expected as most new coaches struggle year 1. there was hope for the future
2015 should have been a step up year, and the team could have easily had 10 wins with just average playcalling and in-game decision making.
both seasons sucked. -
2015 (7-6, 4-5)2015 because defense.
Both years sucked though. -
2015 (7-6, 4-5)
I hate to down vote you, but replacing the entire front 7 minus Feeney and upgrading the defense was the best thing to develop. Also having an actual RB (when decided to be used) was better than praying 4 star Lavon Coultrain would figure out how to move.dnc said:2015 because defense.
Both years sucked though.
Vagina playcalling and Beaver OC aside, this year was better than last. -
2015 (7-6, 4-5)Who the fuck did The 2014 team beat? And less Sark on 2015 better defense and better QB
-
SIBTTPOTD
-
2015 (7-6, 4-5)
I hate to downvote you, but I picked 2015Doogles said:
I hate to down vote you, but replacing the entire front 7 minus Feeney and upgrading the defense was the best thing to develop. Also having an actual RB (when decided to be used) was better than praying 4 star Lavon Coultrain would figure out how to move.dnc said:2015 because defense.
Both years sucked though.
Vagina playcalling and Beaver OC aside, this year was better than last.

























