The Jesse Callier Commemorative Post-Collegiate Career Impact Ranking Initiative

chuck said:

0 = left early and never played enough to get noticed.

1 = showed some sign of eventually being good enough to play but left too early, or played but sucked ass and left early or sucked ass but somehow occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years. Sub injuries in for suck anywhere above and you get a 1 as well.

2 = occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years never rising above backup, or played a bit in a reasonable backup role but had a shortened stay, or looked good but played few meaningful snaps due to injury or other factor forcing them to leave.

3 = very promising but short career with meaningful snaps played, or full career mostly as a key reserve or just a mediocre starter.

4 = Minimum 2 years as a good (as opposed to default) starter, also at least all league honorable mention caliber at least one season (in my judgement not necessarily selected).

5 = Like 4 except first team all league caliber and AA consideration at a minimum. A guy who is always better than the one playing the same position on the other team.

I make up new criteria on the spot every time I do this. Fuck you all. I'm good at this.

Thats some grade inflation right there. Everyone gets a 3 if they don't quit?


In my mind anyone that left early other than for the pros is a 0 or maybe a 1.

After removing them the distribution of players should be something like this:

1- 10%
2- 20%
3- 40%
4- 20%
5-10%

However we kinda sucked the last 4-5 years so skew it slightly downward.

FremontTroll said:

chuck said:

0 = left early and never played enough to get noticed.

1 = showed some sign of eventually being good enough to play but left too early, or played but sucked ass and left early or sucked ass but somehow occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years. Sub injuries in for suck anywhere above and you get a 1 as well.

2 = occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years never rising above backup, or played a bit in a reasonable backup role but had a shortened stay, or looked good but played few meaningful snaps due to injury or other factor forcing them to leave.

3 = very promising but short career with meaningful snaps played, or full career mostly as a key reserve or just a mediocre starter.

4 = Minimum 2 years as a good (as opposed to default) starter, also at least all league honorable mention caliber at least one season (in my judgement not necessarily selected).

5 = Like 4 except first team all league caliber and AA consideration at a minimum. A guy who is always better than the one playing the same position on the other team.

I make up new criteria on the spot every time I do this. Fuck you all. I'm good at this.

Thats some grade inflation right there. Everyone gets a 3 if they don't quit?


In my mind anyone that left early other than for the pros is a 0 or maybe a 1.

After removing them the distribution of players should be something like this:

1- 10%
2- 20%
3- 40%
4- 20%
5-10%

However we kinda sucked the last 4-5 years so skew it slightly downward.

chuck said:

FremontTroll said:

chuck said:

0 = left early and never played enough to get noticed.

1 = showed some sign of eventually being good enough to play but left too early, or played but sucked ass and left early or sucked ass but somehow occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years. Sub injuries in for suck anywhere above and you get a 1 as well.

2 = occupied a scholarship for 4-5 years never rising above backup, or played a bit in a reasonable backup role but had a shortened stay, or looked good but played few meaningful snaps due to injury or other factor forcing them to leave.

3 = very promising but short career with meaningful snaps played, or full career mostly as a key reserve or just a mediocre starter.

4 = Minimum 2 years as a good (as opposed to default) starter, also at least all league honorable mention caliber at least one season (in my judgement not necessarily selected).

5 = Like 4 except first team all league caliber and AA consideration at a minimum. A guy who is always better than the one playing the same position on the other team.

I make up new criteria on the spot every time I do this. Fuck you all. I'm good at this.

Thats some grade inflation right there. Everyone gets a 3 if they don't quit?


In my mind anyone that left early other than for the pros is a 0 or maybe a 1.

After removing them the distribution of players should be something like this:

1- 10%
2- 20%
3- 40%
4- 20%
5-10%

However we kinda sucked the last 4-5 years so skew it slightly downward.

Nope you missed part of the 2 category. Shitty players who linger around for a career get a 2. Guys like Scott lawyer or Damion turpin fit well. Marvin hall probably fits. D. Cooper fits when/if he ever leavea and gives us the chance to rank him.

Disagree. You don't get points just for showing up. This is big boy football.