Chris Polk, Bishop Sankey, Myles Gaskin


Washington running backs that have bailed out their stupid fucking coaches.
Comments
-
Lol right
-
Post of the year
-
huh?CuntWaffle said:Lol right
-
DerekJohnson said:
Post of the year
-
Can someone ask Pete what it feels like having a freshman running back make you look competent.
-
I'm sure the hard-hitting Seattle media will ask.jecornel said:Can someone ask Pete what it feels like having a freshman running back make you look competent.
-
And as a follow up: and who has bailed you and Smith's ass the last half of the yearjecornel said:Can someone ask Pete what it feels like having a freshman running back make you look competent.
-
Petersen and (especially) JSmithFS deserve plenty of criticism, but they get earned some praise for identifying and playing Gaskin more and more. It should have been even more than what we got, but the staff recruited and rode him to several wins.jecornel said:Can someone ask Pete what it feels like having a freshman running back make you look competent.
-
Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
-
Gaskin would be at ASU if it wasn't for Peterman
-
Who knew that giving Gaskin carries and being "stubborn" with the run would help the entire offense?
-
We have had great RB's but 7-6 records aren't really bailing Sark and Pete out.
-
It's not like it's his job is to recruit kids literally 5 miles away from campus or anything. I guess he gets paid for nothing.HuskyClaws said:Gaskin would be at ASU if it wasn't for Peterman
-
gaskin wants a "world class" edukation I guessDennis_DeYoung said:
It's not like it's his job is to recruit kids literally 5 miles away from campus or anything. I guess he gets paid for nothing.HuskyClaws said:Gaskin would be at ASU if it wasn't for Peterman
-
I liked the hike-to-gaskin play. What they should do is design a GASKIN-RUMBLE play like have two tight ends and nothing but blocking backs in the backfield. When hiked gaskin just runs wherever there is daylihgt. I mean, don't Xs and Os a damn thing. Not even the offense would know where it was supposed to go... nothing but gaskin juking.
-
ApostleofGrief said:
I liked the hike-to-gaskin play. What they should do is design a GASKIN-RUMBLE play like have two tight ends and nothing but blocking backs in the backfield. When hiked gaskin just runs wherever there is daylihgt. I mean, don't Xs and Os a damn thing. Not even the offense would know where it was supposed to go... nothing but gaskin juking.
OK! -
ApostleofGrief said:
gaskin wants a "world class" edukation I guessDennis_DeYoung said:
It's not like it's his job is to recruit kids literally 5 miles away from campus or anything. I guess he gets paid for nothing.HuskyClaws said:Gaskin would be at ASU if it wasn't for Peterman
OK! -
Hard to say who knew, but sadly our OC and his HC would be ones we could put in the "didn't know" category.RoadDawg55 said:Who knew that giving Gaskin carries and being "stubborn" with the run would help the entire offense?
-
Millions of doogs would disagree.RoadDawg55 said:We have had great RB's but 7-6 records aren't really bailing Sark and Pete out.
-
Chip had JJ, Snoop, LGB, LaMike, and Barner who were all much better than Gaskin and they were all 1,000 yard backs.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
Snoop is in the Pro-Bowl this year, JJ was the best back in the conference as a senior, LGB starts for the best franchise in the NFL, LaMike won the Doak Walker, and Barner was the best back in the conference in his last year.
Oregon has had an elite running back since Reuben Droughns and has one now who is better than Gaskin and will have one as long as Gary Campbell is around.
Gaskin would have gotten a few carries at Oregon this year, but with Tyner back next he'd never see the field. He's a nice back for a .500 program but don't get carried away. -
You guys have the advantage of roids.Mosster47 said:
Chip had JJ, Snoop, LGB, LaMike, and Barner who were all much better than Gaskin and they were all 1,000 yard backs.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
Snoop is in the Pro-Bowl this year, JJ was the best back in the conference as a senior, LGB starts for the best franchise in the NFL, LaMike won the Doak Walker, and Barner was the best back in the conference in his last year.
Oregon has had an elite running back since Reuben Droughns and has one now who is better than Gaskin and will have one as long as Gary Campbell is around.
Gaskin would have gotten a few carries at Oregon this year, but with Tyner back next he'd never see the field. He's a nice back for a .500 program but don't get carried away. -
Under Don James, Gaskin would have finished the season with about 350 yds, not starting until the Oregon St. Game. Coleman would have been the main back, and finish the season with exactly 1000 yds in 10 games. 25 carries a games, ala Greg Lewis. Need 3 yds, he'll get you 4. Need 5 yds, he'll get you 4. Williams and Lindquist would each start 6 games as DJ ain't playing no Fr QB. We? Would win quite a few games 13-10. Race would want him fired after only getting 3 first downs in the win over Oregon.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
Under Chip, he would have had about 600 yds. DWASH would have 1100 yds rushing and 700 yds receiving. Butta Baker would be the 2nd leading rusher, Qualls would be an O-Lineman and we would win some games 42-38 and would hate the fact all of our 4 stars were always moved to offense.
Saban would run him for 1700 yds, our? QB wouldn't be able to hit the broadside of a barn, tho would still somehow be a Heisman candidate, and we would have the best defense in the Pac 12, giving up 17 pts a game. Unfortunately, you have to throw the ball in the Pac to win, and we would lose every road game since he wouldn't understand why any road trip should take more than 15 minutes by a boosters private jet to get to. Puppy would want him fired because he would rant that he was being exposed in a real league.
Harbaugh would punch out Woody and call the prez a dyke and get fired 3 weeks before the season started.
Meyer would be disappointed that boosters didn't pay the players enough, and would leave after one undefeated season in which Gaskin got suspended for free lattes and we? Self reported ourselves? out of the Natty game. -
This is so real.Alexis said:
Under Don James, Gaskin would have finished the season with about 350 yds, not starting until the Oregon St. Game. Coleman would have been the main back, and finish the season with exactly 1000 yds in 10 games. 25 carries a games, ala Greg Lewis. Need 3 yds, he'll get you 4. Need 5 yds, he'll get you 4. Williams and Lindquist would each start 6 games as DJ ain't playing no Fr QB. We? Would win quite a few games 13-10. Race would want him fired after only getting 3 first downs in the win over Oregon.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
-
"Nice back" like RichRod is a great coach?Mosster47 said:
Chip had JJ, Snoop, LGB, LaMike, and Barner who were all much better than Gaskin and they were all 1,000 yard backs.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
Snoop is in the Pro-Bowl this year, JJ was the best back in the conference as a senior, LGB starts for the best franchise in the NFL, LaMike won the Doak Walker, and Barner was the best back in the conference in his last year.
Oregon has had an elite running back since Reuben Droughns and has one now who is better than Gaskin and will have one as long as Gary Campbell is around.
Gaskin would have gotten a few carries at Oregon this year, but with Tyner back next he'd never see the field. He's a nice back for a .500 program but don't get carried away.
Or, "nice back" like "that was a GOOD Utah team?"
Nice backhanded bullshit compliment, as always. -
Mosster must be a woosh account. No one is that fucking stupid.
In 2017 Duck fans would give up their left nut to have Gaskin. -
Gaskin is better than any of those Oregon running backs as a freshman. The fact he is playing on UW makes it more impressive
-
Disagree. Time have changed and DJ would have changed with them, as he showed when he went to the one-back late in his career. He would have have Napoleon carry more.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is so real.Alexis said:
Under Don James, Gaskin would have finished the season with about 350 yds, not starting until the Oregon St. Game. Coleman would have been the main back, and finish the season with exactly 1000 yds in 10 games. 25 carries a games, ala Greg Lewis. Need 3 yds, he'll get you 4. Need 5 yds, he'll get you 4. Williams and Lindquist would each start 6 games as DJ ain't playing no Fr QB. We? Would win quite a few games 13-10. Race would want him fired after only getting 3 first downs in the win over Oregon.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
-
Do you possess even the slightest sense of humor or irony?DerekJohnson said:
Disagree. Time have changed and DJ would have changed with them, as he showed when he went to the one-back late in his career. He would have have Napoleon carry more.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is so real.Alexis said:
Under Don James, Gaskin would have finished the season with about 350 yds, not starting until the Oregon St. Game. Coleman would have been the main back, and finish the season with exactly 1000 yds in 10 games. 25 carries a games, ala Greg Lewis. Need 3 yds, he'll get you 4. Need 5 yds, he'll get you 4. Williams and Lindquist would each start 6 games as DJ ain't playing no Fr QB. We? Would win quite a few games 13-10. Race would want him fired after only getting 3 first downs in the win over Oregon.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
-
This is so real.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Do you possess even the slightest sense of humor or irony?DerekJohnson said:
Disagree. Time have changed and DJ would have changed with them, as he showed when he went to the one-back late in his career. He would have have Napoleon carry more.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is so real.Alexis said:
Under Don James, Gaskin would have finished the season with about 350 yds, not starting until the Oregon St. Game. Coleman would have been the main back, and finish the season with exactly 1000 yds in 10 games. 25 carries a games, ala Greg Lewis. Need 3 yds, he'll get you 4. Need 5 yds, he'll get you 4. Williams and Lindquist would each start 6 games as DJ ain't playing no Fr QB. We? Would win quite a few games 13-10. Race would want him fired after only getting 3 first downs in the win over Oregon.PurpleJ said:Wonder what Don James would have done with Gaskin. Or Chip Kelly for that matter. Or Saban, Harvbaugh, Meyer Belichick, etc. See the trend here?
-
have have?