Good Article from Bill Connelly

http://www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/12/22/10632776/heart-of-dallas-bowl-preview-southern-miss-washington?_ga=1.41444834.1307776790.1448828591
Here are some excerpts...
Stumbles against decent-not-great teams and an inability to close out close games was a reminder that Washington is not yet to its intended destination. But the blowout wins were a reminder of where the Huskies could be headed.
In Washington's six wins, the Huskies have managed a standard downs success rate of 55.6 percent. In their six losses, it's 36.9 percent. Southern Miss has a pretty good pass rush in obvious passing situations, and you can get to Browning: Washington's allowing a 10.7 percent sack rate on passing downs, 113th in the country. Get stops on first down, and Southern Miss can stay in the game for 60 minutes. But if the young Husky offense is remaining in comfortable downs and distances, this could turn into the kind of blowout Washington wins tend to become.
Comments
-
So what are we to infer from these advanced analytical metric calculations?
-
If UW can score more points than the Southern Miss Salukis, then we(?) have as good a chance as any to win the game.PostGameOrangeSlices said:So what are we to infer from these advanced analytical metric calculations?
P.S. For the football junkie, The keys are running the ball successfully and then passing successfully off of our(?) run success. -
standard downs success rate?
-
These are complex stats. Get ahold of VAJ and ax him to splain itFire_Marshall_Bill said:standard downs success rate?
-
We had more sacks than usual because of Brownsocks. Our line is average, but he was atrocious "at times".
If Lil Jakey can look like good Jake, we should destroy this team. If he looks like Brownsocks, we will get beat like we did vs. every decent opponent.
This is mostly because BabushkaFS will continue to not run the ball the way he should. -
Our line was "average" ?
Did you not watch the 1st half of the season? -
HuskyInAZ said:
Our line was "average" ?
Did you not watch the 1st half of the season?
DeYoungFS as always -
But he is an entertaining caster. So he's got that going for him.
-
Riveting synopsis.
Keep the Huskies in 2nd and/or 3rd and long and you have a chance.
That doesn't relate to every football game played since the beginning of time. -
No kiddingclaycha said:
These are complex stats. Get ahold of VAJ and ax him to splain itFire_Marshall_Bill said:standard downs success rate?
This is entering beisbol territory. -
UW will win or UW will lose. Either way it won't be interesting.PostGameOrangeSlices said:So what are we to infer from these advanced analytical metric calculations?
-
Shit article. Shit writer.
-
Huh?
-
UW has blwon out shit teams since Sark. I don't see how that shows anything. We are still losing all the big games
-
Losing the big games by a lot less with a team full of underclassmen and a true freshman QBRaceBannon said:UW has blwon out shit teams since Sark. I don't see how that shows anything. We are still losing all the big games
-
FuckPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Losing the big games by a lot less with a team full of underclassmen and a true freshman QBRaceBannon said:UW has blwon out shit teams since Sark. I don't see how that shows anything. We are still losing all the big games
-
AgreeRaceBannon said:
FuckPostGameOrangeSlices said:
Losing the big games by a lot less with a team full of underclassmen and a true freshman QBRaceBannon said:UW has blwon out shit teams since Sark. I don't see how that shows anything. We are still losing all the big games
-
-
Wait, so playing Southern Miss in the Heart O Dallas Bowel isn't a big game???RaceBannon said:UW has blwon out shit teams since Sark. I don't see how that shows anything. We are still losing all the big games