Generation Cry Baby: Why Millennials Are a Fucking Joke
Comments
-
Dad?Doogles said:
-
D2D, I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.d2d said:RCW 9.58.010(1): Libel and Slander
Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --
(1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)
For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.
One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.
I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.
There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.
Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.
I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).
Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.
I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek. -
Fuck, Mother-Fucker, J! You got me again! I can't keep up with your thread-within-thread jokes. Fuck.GulagDawg said:
D2D, I haven't paid close attention to the spat between you and others. But you've come to this board voluntarily and thus, voluntarily subject yourself to the comments you feel are libelous. Yes, some posters unfamiliar with the legal standards for slander and libel have gone overboard and you have every right to set them straight and fight back should you choose to do so. But playing the Retired Attorney card? Really? There's another, even older saying that "A lawyer who represents himself has a fool for a client." You're displaying very thin skin here, bud. It's like claiming battery after jumping into a mosh pit. As Shakespeare once wrote, Discretion is the better part of valor. Ignore the fuck-heads who doubt you, but why waste your time spilling your emotions and threatening lawsuits? Isn't the beauty of this forum the fact that anything goes? Sticks and stones, bud. This isn't a call-out, btw. Consider it a plea.d2d said:RCW 9.58.010(1): Libel and Slander
Every malicious publication by writing, printing, picture, effigy, sign[,] radio broadcasting or which shall in any other manner transmit the human voice or reproduce the same from records or other appliances or means, which shall tend: --
(1) To expose any living person to hatred, contempt, ridicule or obloquy, or to deprive him of the benefit of public confidence or social intercourse[.] (Emphasis added.)
For many months I have ignored the Libelous and Slanderous things said about me. No more.
One thing about being a retired attorney whose license is in suspension because I don't want to keep paying about a thousand dollars a year for "continuing education" and Bar dues, is I have plenty of time to devote to one pro se lawsuit.
I don't need to pay an attorney to represent me if I want to sue somebody, I can simply file it pro se. In this case it would be a John Doe(s) law suit against certain persons' screen name, and I would then amend the suit later with the your real name once I inspected Derek's records during discovery.
There's an old saying that the most dangerous attorney is the one with only one case and lots of time on his hands. I guess that would describe me.
Although I did not specialize in Libel Slander, I have represented three plaintiffs regarding Libel Slander. I won all three, and none were as clear cut as this. There is clearly malice and recklessness in this case. As such, the burden of proof shifts to the DEFENDANT, to prove you aren't libel for damages. By the way, this is BOTH a civil and a criminal statute and the King County Prosecuting Attorney's office owes me a favor.
I like it in here, but I will not be slandered and libeled. Nor will I stand silent as my facebook account is hacked. I am NOT anonymous in here. I have signed several of my posts in dm.com with my real name. Yesterday, I published my picture, (both of which are more than you have).
Knock it off now, or suffer the consequences.
I will not comment on this any further in threads and will instead discuss the matter with Derek. -
That's my shit you're re-posting Gulag & J. Where's my credit? Is it common practice to copy others posts and pass them off as your own? Serious question. If its common practice in these forums, then fine. But I'm guessing it's not.
-
In other words find the thread where this belongs. Or just try posting something original instead of plagiarism my shit fucko. This is precisely why this is the first response you've had in 8 months you bearded cunt ya.TurdBuffer said:That's my shit you're re-posting Gulag & J. Where's my credit? Is it common practice to copy others posts and pass them off as your own? Serious question. If its common practice in these forums, then fine. But I'm guessing it's not.
-
Ok fuck. I've been holding back because of the clearance issues and shit, but I'm a seal team 6 member, 28 confirmed AND I was admitted to Whitman AND Middlebury AND Wesleyan and turned them down because I was too bad ass for a LAC.
I've been wanting to get that off my chest for a while.
You're welcome for my service. -
Getting back to bashing liberal pussies...RaceBannon said:2 things. The reason my kids are so old is because I got them half way grown and my wife had them when she was a teen so that threw off my calculations.
I'll do something never before seen here and admit I was wrong on that. I like to bash boomers as much as the next guy but we did some good things too. We taught America how to party.
This whole dividing the country by generation is hurtful and adds to the pain the millennials are suffering. They see a future that doesn't look as bright as the present.
Boomer moved out of mom's basement and could hope to work and get a better house. Millennials don't want to leave that house. Can you blame them? Their parents enable them. My wife was at the kids high school graduation with their bags packed.
There are some pretty soft folks but keep in mind millennials have been fighting our wars lately. And yes, boomers are by and large the stupid fucks that won't let them win the wars.
I was switching cell phones and went through 2 millennials before the manager was able to help me. Yes I am an asshole but I wasn't being one that day. I was simply trying to help the kid with some tips on customer service and he damn near started crying.
I think women are tougher than men these days and I think there may be something to the war on boys in the school system we have heard about for years. The chickens are coming home to roost
In regard to the war on boys, I've had 4 teachers tell me I should put my 5-8 year old sons on drugs. If I were like most selfish pussies today, I would have let these lazy feminazis get away with their destruction. Instead, I politely told them to get fucked. Both were just being boys and both are/were doing extremely well just a few years later as they started to understand the bullshit game they are being forced to play. I love telling people they're fucking morons to their face...in a nice way of course...sometimes not so nice. -
Your kids are probably assholes like you are. A little Ativan goes a long way
-
A couple bong hits and a fifth of Jack is fine too.AZDuck said:Your kids are probably assholes like you are. A little Ativan goes a long way
The little fuckers grow up eventually. And then they're society's problem. -
But did you earn a BATTLEFIELD COMMISSION??!?!!!1creepycoug said:Ok fuck. I've been holding back because of the clearance issues and shit, but I'm a seal team 6 member, 28 confirmed AND I was admitted to Whitman AND Middlebury AND Wesleyan and turned them down because I was too bad ass for a LAC.
I've been wanting to get that off my chest for a while.
You're welcome for my service.
