Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Bleacher Report is your source??!? (Sark's lawyers)

2

Comments

  • AEB
    AEB Member Posts: 3,022
    I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    topdawgnc said:

    Of course there will be testimony that players smelled alcohol on his breath during that game.

    Diabetics emit an odor some confuse for alcohol.

    Mouthwash contains alcohol.

    Are these kids experts?????
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    AEB said:

    I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

    I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.
  • sarktastic
    sarktastic Member Posts: 9,208
    TTJ said:

    AEB said:

    I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

    I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.
    You know this how?
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    TTJ said:

    AEB said:

    I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.

    I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.
    You know this how?
    Interned for @creepycoug.
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    Sark's lawyers will then go to exhibit B (Pac 12 Network's Yogi Roth) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit C (ESPN's Herbstreit) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit D (Colin Cowturd) and then, boom!, they win the law suit.
  • UWerentThereMan
    UWerentThereMan Member Posts: 3,475

    Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?

    Just wait for the USC attorneys' answer...
    USC attorneys are tanned, rested and ready.
    image
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827

    You know this how?

    Which part? It's all a matter of public record.