Bleacher Report is your source??!? (Sark's lawyers)
Between the Salute to Troy event in August 2015 and mid-October 2015, again, notwithstanding the professional and personal pressures he faced, Steve Sarkisian performed all his duties and performed them well, leading the team to a 3-1 record. One of those wins was a 42-14 victory against Arizona State University ("ASU"). Sean Frye, writing for the Bleacher Report who issues grades after every USC game, graded Steve Sarkisian an A+ for his work coaching the Trojans to that victory against ASU in September 2015.
Comments
-
Of course there will be testimony that players smelled alcohol on his breath during that game.
-
If bleach report gives you and A+ you are exonerated from any insubordination....
-
Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?
-
LOL. Arkansas State, Idaho, Loss to Standford, ASUFremontTroll said:From page 8 of the complaint:
Between the Salute to Troy event in August 2015 and mid-October 2015, again, notwithstanding the professional and personal pressures he faced, Steve Sarkisian performed all his duties and performed them well, leading the team to a 3-1 record. One of those wins was a 42-14 victory against Arizona State University ("ASU"). Sean Frye, writing for the Bleacher Report who issues grades after every USC game, graded Steve Sarkisian an A+ for his work coaching the Trojans to that victory against ASU in September 2015. -
Didn't Sark come out after the Salute to Troy and say he didn't have a problem.
And actually refuse the full treatment SC offered.
He kind of killed himself in the foot in some areas.
-
No. He said that with the help of Haden, they would figure that out, together. Hahahahahaatopdawgnc said:Didn't Sark come out after the Salute to Troy and say he didn't have a problem.
And actually refuse the full treatment SC offered.
He kind of killed himself in the foot in some areas.
-
Just wait for the USC attorneys' answer...DerekJohnson said:Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?
-
fuck o dear!
-
Thank the good Lord. I was truly deppressed I was not going to get anymore enjoyment from this sordid tale.
It lessons the blow of the realization that we employed that asshat for 5 years. -
Recall that ASU was the game where El Siete's own assistants pulled him out of a player huddle for abusive behavior after smelling his boozy breath.
This lawsuit is going nowhere. But its mere existence is glorious. -
I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
Diabetics emit an odor some confuse for alcohol.topdawgnc said:Of course there will be testimony that players smelled alcohol on his breath during that game.
Mouthwash contains alcohol.
Are these kids experts????? -
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
If I were tasked with making up the stupidest fucking scenario for a moron coach to have the most retardedly epic fit of hubris leading to a downfall, then the fallout of that, I would've never dreamed to write that lawyer's would cite Bleacher Report game grades as evidence of sobriety. Never.
And I think of a lot of weird shit.
God I love life. -
You know this how?TTJ said:
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
Interned for @creepycoug.sarktastic said:
You know this how?TTJ said:
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
Sark's lawyers will then go to exhibit B (Pac 12 Network's Yogi Roth) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit C (ESPN's Herbstreit) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit D (Colin Cowturd) and then, boom!, they win the law suit.
-
If you have the warrior poet on your side, you're playing with house money.Meek said:Sark's lawyers will then go to exhibit B (Pac 12 Network's Yogi Roth) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit C (ESPN's Herbstreit) for a ton of quotes and then exhibit D (Colin Cowturd) and then, boom!, they win the law suit.
-
USC attorneys are tanned, rested and ready.FremontTroll said:
Just wait for the USC attorneys' answer...DerekJohnson said:Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?
-
Which part? It's all a matter of public record.sarktastic said:You know this how?
-
as he emerges from THE FLAMES OF HELLUWerentThereMan said:
USC attorneys are tanned, rested and ready.FremontTroll said:
Just wait for the USC attorneys' answer...DerekJohnson said:Wonder why the attorneys aren't quoting from Hardcore Husky?
-
Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.TTJ said:
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
He's getting something, but not 30 million.KoolAidMan said:
Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.TTJ said:
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
Chlamydia?topdawgnc said:
He's getting something, but not 30 million.KoolAidMan said:
Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.TTJ said:
I'd be shocked if USC ever pays a penny. Haden asked Sark in August whether he had a problem, and the answer was no. This case isn't about disability accommodation; it's about a guy who repeatedly showed up impaired at work.AEB said:I think he'll get a settlement. Employment law in CA is skewed towards the employee, and in Siete's defense, he admitted an addiction and admitted himself into a treatment facility whereupon he was canned. To fire someone while receiving treatment is dangerous. SCs response will be interesting. Don't assume they've got this air tight.
-
KoolAidMan said:
Whether Sark said no or not, he saw a psychologist and a psychiatrist and began treatment. At that point, his diagnosis should have been in the medical records. He can just ask for a release of his records.
-
and he had a CONTRACT!
