Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW's Offensive Line: A Critical and Thoughtful Analysis

24

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    WhiskeyDawg said:

    Good read.

    As Always?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    I've talked to Cream Puff personally about the O line, "We get it. We'll bring them in." - 2010, Portland Alum event.

    This guy is one dumb mother fucker to be blunt. How can you be a QB and not understand you're only as good as your line?

    If his only failure was O line recruiting (I wished) he would still be a marginal coach.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Steve_Bowman said:

    I've talked to Cream Puff personally about the O line, "We get it. We'll bring them in." - 2010, Portland Alum event.

    This guy is one dumb mother fucker to be blunt. How can you be a QB and not understand you're only as good as your line?

    If his only failure was O line recruiting (I wished) he would still be a marginal coach.

    Was that the one at 50 Plates? If so, I was there. I also heard him say 9 wins in 2010.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HuskyJW
    HuskyJW Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,487 Founders Club
    You guys can quote something from 3 years ago....but nobody can remember a direct Kim quote from last week?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HillsboroDuck
    HillsboroDuck Member Posts: 9,186
    HuskyJW said:

    You guys can quote something from 3 years ago....but nobody can remember a direct Kim quote from last week?

    There's quite a few people on this bored who no longer have access to Kim's quotes. What did he say?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • 73dawg
    73dawg Member Posts: 6
    Your " critical and thoughtful analysis" ignores 2 salient facts. Willinghams first recruiting year came off a decent program left to him and part of that recruiting was built off neuheisels recruiting efforts. Sark's firt year was just 2 months and built off Willingham's ugly program. So be a real analysis you should just compare both coaches last 4 years.
    Sark for those 4 years scores 1724 compared to Mr. W's 1429 points. Clearly your critical and thoughtful numbers ignore those points
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,035 Founders Club
    Huh?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited April 2013
    Huh? is right. One guy is probably the worst coach in college football history, the other is merely a poor coach. The salient facts don't change the dismal pictures for these two.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ACSlaterDawg
    ACSlaterDawg Member Posts: 200
    73dawg said:

    Your " critical and thoughtful analysis" ignores 2 salient facts. Willinghams first recruiting year came off a decent program left to him and part of that recruiting was built off neuheisels recruiting efforts. Sark's firt year was just 2 months and built off Willingham's ugly program. So be a real analysis you should just compare both coaches last 4 years.
    Sark for those 4 years scores 1724 compared to Mr. W's 1429 points. Clearly your critical and thoughtful numbers ignore those points

    Thanks for that.......

    Sark still fucking sucks.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Steve_Bowman
    Steve_Bowman Member Posts: 442
    edited April 2013
    The main reason he sucks so much is the pathetic AD slugs will keep his dead wood butt around as long as he stays above 500. Hiring is a pain in the ass. They don't want to work that hard.

    Plus he's a nice guy that's fun to have a beer with.....winning isn't everything.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter