Today's SEC corruption...
Comments
-
The Cuogs were in the top 20.RoadDawg55 said:
I like to downplay wins over top 10-15 teams. It's what I like to do. How many top 10-15 teams has Alabama beaten?PurpleThrobber said:
Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.doogsinparadise said:
Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.PurpleThrobber said:
*lost to Mike Riley.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
*beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.
*beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.
Fags like Jude vote on that shit.
-
Whatever you want to believe Throbber. Were Ohio State and Iowa bad wins too?PurpleThrobber said:
The Cuogs were in the top 20.RoadDawg55 said:
I like to downplay wins over top 10-15 teams. It's what I like to do. How many top 10-15 teams has Alabama beaten?PurpleThrobber said:
Natl championship caliber teams don't put themselves in a position to lose to Mike fucking Riley due to refs.doogsinparadise said:
Lost to the refs while playing Mike Riley, but sure.PurpleThrobber said:
*lost to Mike Riley.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
*beat Michigan on pure stupidity by Harbaugh.
*beat Oregon with VAJ and a broken finger.
Fags like Jude vote on that shit. -
I'm hearing they play the games on the field for a reason. That said, I like Bama to win it all.
-
I like the idea of rewarding the teams that are playing the best by the end of the year. If the playoff was around in the Pete Carroll era, USC would have skull fucked the country for at least 4 titles.
-
Good thing they didn't do that last year.RaceBannon said:Just crown the winner of the SEC championship game
-
The old system would have Alabama vs Clemson in the Sugar Bowl, Oklahoma vs Iowa in the Orang Bowl, Stanford vs MSU in the Rose Bowl and OSU vs ND in the Fiesta Bowl. And if Clemson won, they would be handed a poll title; if Alabama won, then the 1-loss teams would all be arguing. Probably better than the current system, and the conference seasons would be more fun, and New Year's Day would no longer be ruined.
Or you can go to the system I have been advocating for a while: Pac 12 vs Big 10 in Rose Bowl, SEC vs Big 12 in Sugar Bowl, winners in the Jerry Bowl. Champion gets the bonus trophy.
People forget the new system is still not an NCAA playoff. It is just another private group deciding how it wants to make a champion.
Bowls make money, and they all get better ratings than weeknight NBA or NCAA bball games, so they will be sticking around for a while. -
Post the schedules bitch. Let puppy expose 'your' hind licking conference and "UA team" for what they are.PurpleJ said:Doesn't really matter who's 2 and who's 3 on a neutral field, does it now PuppyFS? Let them play the games and plug up your cunt. All the deserving teams got in. They all won their respective conferences. So shut the fuck up and let em play dipshit.
-
Does matter new fish bitch. It keeps Alabama from playing Oklahoma or Clemson, 2 teams who would roll the tide. Committee wants easiest path for Alabama and the SEC. No question bama should be 4 with their schedule and performance vs Florida Atlantic. Of course That couldnt happen. So lets keep bambam at #2 (most unwarranted ranking ive ever seen in my 30 years) and bump Oklahoma (the team most certain to beat bambi) to #4 to protect them.Mad_Son said:Who even cares about who is 2 or 3? The teams play each other... 1/2 and 3/4 are the real ranks to quibble over if you care to quibble.
Rankings make a huge fucking deal 1-4. Alabama has done NOTHING to warrant their cemented-in #2 ranking. The schedules show the blatant corruption at the top -
I know winners win and losers lose, but that Michigan win deserves an asterisk.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
They should be #2 but in the end it doesn't matter -
Alabama didn't play Florida Atlanticpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Does matter new fish bitch. It keeps Alabama from playing Oklahoma or Clemson, 2 teams who would roll the tide. Committee wants easiest path for Alabama and the SEC. No question bama should be 4 with their schedule and performance vs Florida Atlantic. Of course That couldnt happen. So lets keep bambam at #2 (most unwarranted ranking ive ever seen in my 30 years) and bump Oklahoma (the team most certain to beat bambi) to #4 to protect them.Mad_Son said:Who even cares about who is 2 or 3? The teams play each other... 1/2 and 3/4 are the real ranks to quibble over if you care to quibble.
Rankings make a huge fucking deal 1-4. Alabama has done NOTHING to warrant their cemented-in #2 ranking. The schedules show the blatant corruption at the top
-
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
-
I still advocate for the ACC, B1G, B-12, P-12 and SEC champions + 3 at large bids.HuskyInAZ said:
Best poast I've read on this cluster fuck situation. The answer is either ...Dennis_DeYoung said:The playoff is fucking stupid.
This is not, in any sense, an improvement over any other system.
If Clemson loses a close game, they will have a super high quality loss (something that none of these other teams have) and the same record as the winner.
If they lose in the title game, they'll have more quality wins.
You can't have 110 teams, 5 leagues, varying schedules and accurately find the 'best' team.
This is the reason I've always been against a 'playoff' because it solves nothing.
The beauty of college football was always that every game mattered. Now, you can lose to a Shit team in October and so long as the committee thinks you're good, it doesn't matter.
If you move to 4 conferences with 16 teams, championship games, normal bowl tie ins and then a final game, at least that makes sense.
This system is just as dumb as the BCS (probably worse) and definitely worse than the voting system.
1. 4 conferences, 16 teams, conf champ game (quarterfinal), winners advance.
2. Scrap it all and go back to traditional bowl system.
The 4 best conference champions get home quarterfinal games.
#1 Clemson vs whoever they chose for #8 (probably FSU or Okie state)
#2 Alabama vs #7 Iowa
#3 Michigan State vs #6 Ohio State
#4 Oklahoma vs #5 Stanford
I'd include a rule that a 3 loss team may not get an automatic bid, if say USC had won the pac-12 title the bid goes to a 4th at large. The problem with that rule is no one would schedule anyone in non-conference -
And what other 1 loss teams did that didn't get in, Ohio state played a shit schedule and Iowa's was even worsepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
-
4 conferences ... two 8 team divisions per conference ...dhdawg said:
I still advocate for the ACC, B1G, B-12, P-12 and SEC champions + 3 at large bids.HuskyInAZ said:
Best poast I've read on this cluster fuck situation. The answer is either ...Dennis_DeYoung said:The playoff is fucking stupid.
This is not, in any sense, an improvement over any other system.
If Clemson loses a close game, they will have a super high quality loss (something that none of these other teams have) and the same record as the winner.
If they lose in the title game, they'll have more quality wins.
You can't have 110 teams, 5 leagues, varying schedules and accurately find the 'best' team.
This is the reason I've always been against a 'playoff' because it solves nothing.
The beauty of college football was always that every game mattered. Now, you can lose to a Shit team in October and so long as the committee thinks you're good, it doesn't matter.
If you move to 4 conferences with 16 teams, championship games, normal bowl tie ins and then a final game, at least that makes sense.
This system is just as dumb as the BCS (probably worse) and definitely worse than the voting system.
1. 4 conferences, 16 teams, conf champ game (quarterfinal), winners advance.
2. Scrap it all and go back to traditional bowl system.
The 4 best conference champions get home quarterfinal games.
#1 Clemson vs whoever they chose for #8 (probably FSU or Okie state)
#2 Alabama vs #7 Iowa
#3 Michigan State vs #6 Ohio State
#4 Oklahoma vs #5 Stanford
I'd include a rule that a 3 loss team may not get an automatic bid, if say USC had won the pac-12 title the bid goes to a 4th at large. The problem with that rule is no one would schedule anyone in non-conference
Done.
Original Pac8 ... would be one division.
-
10-2 Stanford.dhdawg said:
And what other 1 loss teams did that didn't get in, Ohio state played a shit schedule and Iowa's was even worsepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
#2 Bama , committee set a very bad precedent for current playoff. SOS means FUCKALL OF NOTHING for SEC teams. And SOS means fuckall for BIG12 teams who actually have a strong SOS, Same with Stanford.
Stanford is obviously the best team in the country right now., they played the *REAL* Strongest schedule in the country, and didnt get a crack at playoff because Bama went a shakey 11-1 vs the 50th best schedule, at best.
A 6-team playoff better happen soon, because Stanford would skip to title. Instead the best conference in country gets left out, FOR playing toughest schedule in country.
Time for 6-team playoff. No way should a team like Stanford be left out. Theyd manhandle every team in playoff but Sparty. That should be #1-2 in playoff. Its supposed to be the BEST teams as judged by committee, SOS, Conference championship (OK doesnt have a title game), W-L vs ranked teams (BAMa has 1), OOC games (bama beat Charleston Southern in week 11, Stanford beat ND).
Games up SEC, puppy has exposed yass. Well I did 10 years ago, but I cant just stop, its a daily battle. -
What about "1 loss team" did you not get?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
10-2 Stanforddhdawg said:
And what other 1 loss teams did that didn't get in, Ohio state played a shit schedule and Iowa's was even worsepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
-
El oh elpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
10-2 Stanforddhdawg said:
And what other 1 loss teams did that didn't get in, Ohio state played a shit schedule and Iowa's was even worsepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
-
Told you
-
Such retard, PL_SSpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
10-2 Stanford.dhdawg said:
And what other 1 loss teams did that didn't get in, Ohio state played a shit schedule and Iowa's was even worsepuppylove_sugarsteel said:
Agree bout Sparta. They earned it. Bama hasnt beaten 1 fucking top 20 team.RoadDawg55 said:The match ups are fine, but if SOS actually mattered and wasn't some complicated formula that overrated SEC games, Sparty would be #1. Four wins over top 10-15 teams. Beat Michigan and Ohio State on the road.
#2 Bama , committee set a very bad precedent for current playoff. SOS means FUCKALL OF NOTHING for SEC teams. And SOS means fuckall for BIG12 teams who actually have a strong SOS, Same with Stanford.
Stanford is obviously the best team in the country right now., they played the *REAL* Strongest schedule in the country, and didnt get a crack at playoff because Bama went a shakey 11-1 vs the 50th best schedule, at best.
A 6-team playoff better happen soon, because Stanford would skip to title. Instead the best conference in country gets left out, FOR playing toughest schedule in country.
Time for 6-team playoff. No way should a team like Stanford be left out. Theyd manhandle every team in playoff but Sparty. That should be #1-2 in playoff. Its supposed to be the BEST teams as judged by committee, SOS, Conference championship (OK doesnt have a title game), W-L vs ranked teams (BAMa has 1), OOC games (bama beat Charleston Southern in week 11, Stanford beat ND).
Games up SEC, puppy has exposed yass. Well I did 10 years ago, but I cant just stop, its a daily battle.
-
Says fucking who?Doogles said:I like the idea of rewarding the teams that are playing the best by the end of the year. If the playoff was around in the Pete Carroll era, USC would have skull fucked the country for at least 4 titles.
