Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

why are good QBs shredding the Hawks with short passes?

DerekJohnson
DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,560 Founders Club
What is the weakness there that wasn't there last year? (other than the Dallas game)

Comments

  • Sarksbrownbaglunch
    Sarksbrownbaglunch Member Posts: 189
    No pressure on QB
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,560 Founders Club
    edited November 2015

    No pressure on QB

    That's true for today perhaps, but not so overall. Our front 7 has been outstanding this year.
  • Bob_C
    Bob_C Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,758 Founders Club
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,688 Standard Supporter
    It depends. Some of those short passes are just dump off screens for four yards that they more or less just concede.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,688 Standard Supporter
    edited November 2015
    THe 456 yards they gave up is bad, but between Tom Landry Jones and Rapelisberger, the Steelers were 37/59. They only rushed nine times, not counting Rapelisberger. You're usually going to give up well over 300 yards if a team throws it that much.

    The intermediate over the middle stuff where there's nobody within 5-15 yards is the big issue.
  • dhdawg
    dhdawg Member Posts: 13,326
    they killed them over the top as well
  • godawgst
    godawgst Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,554 Swaye's Wigwam
    San Diego game 2 in 2014 with Antonio Gates and his 3 td's was the first time the TE really hurt them. Gronk in the Super Bowl killed them as well.

    Now, any team with a quality pass catching TE can have a career day versus the Hawks D.

    The aura of the Seahawks D is dead. Teams don't fear Sherman/LOB/ etc al. What is frustrating/perplexing is the sum of the parts adds up to much more than what the total is at this point. It's similar to the 2013 Hawks D who couldn't get off the field when it counted.

    Is there any doubt if Hawks have to punt instead of Baldwin's catch and run for the game winning td Pittsburgh goes down the field and kicks the game winning fg.

    This D is a enigma right now.
  • DerekJohnson
    DerekJohnson Administrator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 68,560 Founders Club
    I chalked up Tom Brady'so performance somewhat to Sherman and Chancellor being hurt.
  • HeretoBeatmyChest
    HeretoBeatmyChest Member Posts: 4,295
    Thought the pass D was better as the game went on but not great. Also, pass rush couldn't get to the QB. I agree with what Roadie said in another post. The LOB guys are not as good this season and CB depth is poor.
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited November 2015

    No pressure on QB

    Plus the way the LBs drop into coverage does not allow them to effectively break up passes and make quick tackles. They're not in good position.

    This is coaching and strategy.
  • d2d
    d2d Member Posts: 3,109
    edited November 2015
    Take away Pitt's big plays and their average pass were all dinks and all open. It's always been the weakness of the USC/Seahawk PC defense. They're static and don't stunt and don't blitz. They started doing some in the 2nd half and created turnovers, but it looked like they'd never practiced it.

    PC hasn't had to change his standard defensive game plan for three years. It's time to adjust.
  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,045 Standard Supporter
    Passion said:

    No pressure on QB

    Plus the way the LBs drop into coverage does not allow them to effectively break up passes and make quick tackles. They're not in good position.

    This is coaching and strategy.
    Yup. Sure looked that way today, and PBurg saw it right away, and often.