Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
SRS Rankings
Comments
-
I heard Doog Fain trying the amateur SRS shit analysis for the Seahawks' 4-5 record on Live! At 5:30. I've had people fucking get on me for being too negative and visceral for getting on both teams, especially the Hawks because the black Panthers and Bangles are just really good.
You usually don't get credit for being close or losing to good teams. One can also usually use the eye test, scores, turnovers, and point differential to determine if a team is close to being good. I don't know, maybe SRS uses those things.
I'd say the Huskies are close to being 6-4, not 9-1. -
Oh it's not? Then why include their *metrics*?RoadDawg55 said:
You are so fucking stupid. It's not about the Cuogs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The obsession continues
-
Because I argue with Chest every week about it.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
Oh it's not? Then why include their *metrics*?RoadDawg55 said:
You are so fucking stupid. It's not about the Cuogs.PostGameOrangeSlices said:The obsession continues
-
folks wanna talk shit and smoke weed like lane kiffykins...WilburHooksHands said:
folks wanna pop offDerekJohnson said:If you take away our win over USC, we're probably 75th.
