we should be 8-1

Comments

• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,067

  November 2015

  2017 baby

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643

  November 2015

  Saban would have won the conference with this team.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,067

  November 2015

  PurpleJ said:

  Saban would have won the conference with this team.

  In his spare time

  3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

  November 2015

  9-1*

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

  November 2015

  Rather easily.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• section_332 Member Posts: 2,403

  November 2015

  Throw away year

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

  November 2015

  I don't think we should be 9-1. That's kind of far fetched, but we should be better than we are.

  9 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Passion Member Posts: 4,622

  November 2015

  I should be married to a supermodel.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• PurpleBaze Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,251

  November 2015

  We? could have been playing with house money by now.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325

  November 2015

  RoadDawg55 said:

  I don't think we should be 9-1. That's kind of far fetched, but we should be better than we are.

  Other than Stanford, a decent coach wins the close games. Especially against this dreck.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

  November 2015

  Aunt + Balls = Uncle

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• godawgst Member Posts: 2,542

  November 2015

  o/u at start of year was 4.5 and I thought that was the steal of the century.
  
  And here we are needing a win versus the beavs to get there (I am more convinced that WSU is going to win the apple cup as only being able to score 17-20 won't get it down versus the cougs).
  
  But that's what happens when you are 1-5 in 50/50 games this year, and would be 0-6 if it wasn't for Sark being Sark.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• wobidbus Member Posts: 308

  November 2015

  We've lost every single toss-up game this year (I don't think USC was a toss up because they were fucked from a coaching standpoint, and our players wanted to let it rip on Sark). I'd be happy with 6-4 at this point, forget about 8-1. FYFMFE

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

  November 2015

  RoadDawg55 said:

  I don't think we should be 9-1. That's kind of far fetched, but we should be better than we are.

  We should be better than we are? Tell me how you figure so I can pepper your argument with bullet holes 55.

  -3 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,026

  November 2015

  puppylove_sugarsteel said:

  RoadDawg55 said:

  I don't think we should be 9-1. That's kind of far fetched, but we should be better than we are.

  We should be better than we are? Tell me how you figure so I can pepper your argument with bullet holes 55.

  Do you watch the games? I'm no expert but the fucking wins were there.
  
  Against Oregon and ASU, UW had multiple 2nd half drives that were 3 & out piece of shit fucking play calling that was either pass, pass, pass or pass, pass, run. Against Oregon, UW did that shit after Gaskin gashed them and UW comes out throwing the ball like Sark is running the offense again. Peterman and Smith have shown a propensity to go away from what's working and go to the passing game. They did it against Cal, against ASU, against Oregon, against Utah.
  
  I can look at yesterday's game and see why they did that based on what ASU was showing them defensively but fuck o' dear after multiple 3 and outs, try to the run ball against the defense again. If the piece of shit WRs can't catch it, Gaskin might at least get you a first down or 2 before UW's defense has to come back out.

  5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

  November 2015

  I heard Oregon would have won the national championship had Dennis Dixon not been hurt.
  
  

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,493

  November 2015

  They should be 6-4. I can accept 6-4 since they're just so young again.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• Sundevil76 Member Posts: 109

  November 2015 edited November 2015

  RoadDawg55 said:

  I don't think we should be 9-1. That's kind of far fetched, but we should be better than we are.

  Yes, you should. Petersen has done a lot less with more that either Graham or Rodrigues. Look at your Scout commits right now? As you mentioned in the past Road Kill, it is easy to get a class rated high at UW since the kids stay home unlike in Phoenix. More than enough talent to be better than four wins in the PAC 12 your first two years. Please don't cry about having no WR's. Oh, that's right - Todd is regressing according to your buddy last week. Gimicky defense and he only won due to Jalen Strong. I got news for him. ASU's recruiting rankings have gone up every year without the luxury of what Peterson had built in. Get Murphy and the Devils will keep the top three Scout 300's players in Arizona. It has taken him four years what is a given in Washington. Under Ericson Chase Lucas would have been a Dawg.Peterman has no excuses after next year, but I do think the Huskys will start contending by next season and be very good. Maybe nine wins in 2016, but you are a serious homer if you remotely think nine wins was possible now? Browning is a true freshman, and it showed. You are going to sign some good players regardless of the season, just like ASU.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• surfpup Member Posts: 34

  November 2015

  Passion said:

  I should be married to a supermodel.

  I am married to a supermodel.

  0 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter