Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it

17891012

Comments

  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    This guy is still here derping it up?

  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    This is elementary analysis, fucking Christ.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Doogs love to make the argument that ypc will go down with more carries, and the related argument that without the 79 yard run player x's ypc would've been only 2.5 or whatever. Don't be that Doog.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320

    And your prescription for fixing the offense is to have more "run plays" and fewer "pass plays." Who needs Smith and Peterson when they have you guys?

    Can't forget the "so you think you're smarter then the coaches" argument. Right from the playbook.
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232

    Doogs love to make the argument that ypc will go down with more carries, and the related argument that without the 79 yard run player x's ypc would've been only 2.5 or whatever. Don't be that Doog.

    Don't also be a fucktard and say that because a guy ran 15 times for 100 yards when one of those carries was for 85 yards that the running game on the hole was a success. It wasn't. It would have got you one big score but otherwise ended up putting you in a lot of long down/distance relationships.
  • doogsinparadise
    doogsinparadise Member Posts: 9,320
    Tequilla said:

    Doogs love to make the argument that ypc will go down with more carries, and the related argument that without the 79 yard run player x's ypc would've been only 2.5 or whatever. Don't be that Doog.

    Don't also be a fucktard and say that because a guy ran 15 times for 100 yards when one of those carries was for 85 yards that the running game on the hole was a success. It wasn't. It would have got you one big score but otherwise ended up putting you in a lot of long down/distance relationships.
    Nice numbers, you get them from @KnocksvilleE?
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    Doogles said:

    It's special talking about next year during this year. It's just so irritating.

    Nothing better than reading about how cal will plummet and Oregon will suck and stanford will go back to being stanford and asu sucks meanwhile we can't beat any of them. Really cool stuff
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,423 Standard Supporter
    phineas said:

    Doogles said:

    It's special talking about next year during this year. It's just so irritating.

    Nothing better than reading about how cal will plummet and Oregon will suck and stanford will go back to being stanford and asu sucks meanwhile we can't beat any of them. Really cool stuff
    But why do I hate the posters on this board?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,423 Standard Supporter
    @KnocksvilleE, nothing to say this week? 62 drop backs is no big deal because we don't know how many were run/pass options. And you wonder why UWdoogpound gets no respect here? Wash the semen out of your eyes.
  • MisterEm
    MisterEm Member Posts: 6,685
    edited November 2015

    @KnocksvilleE, nothing to say this week? 62 drop backs is no big deal because we don't know how many were run/pass options. And you wonder why UWdoogpound gets no respect here? Wash the semen out of your eyes.

    62 drop backs and a 14 point halftime lead that leads to a loss.

    Good luck getting a
    @KnocksvilleE response addressing facts or his previous shit posts.

    Youth, Mickens, Hall, Smiff will be his excuse chain.