Carson's tax plan gets better!!
Comments
-
Yet your link has no relation to your last two questions.RaceBannon said:
I other words, you don't like the truth, so you find something else to shit on. Nice work. -
Christ Hondo. Go shove a RPG up your ass.
-
Purple hates facts too.PurpleJ said:Christ Hondo. Go shove a RPG up your ass.
-
Any fact your news source disagrees with.PurpleJ said: -
I'll never vote for another black president. One was enough thank you.
-
Holy shit you just moved the goal posts. Clearly you hate facts.2001400ex said:A little late there wiki boy
But back to my point - its not whose fault it was its why has this fake recovery been so shitty and why did Reagan do so much better?
Hillary will be running for re election in a recession just like McCain
Good luck the rest of the way
To answer this question.... Here's the reason:
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/partisan-conflict-index
The index is an outgrowth of recent Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia research that finds that the index tends to increase near elections and during debates over such contentious policies as the debt ceiling and health-care reform. Research suggests that increased partisan conflict increases uncertainty among firms and households. Such uncertainty has been shown to slow economic activity by delaying business investment and consumer spending.
I've said it a hundred times. Consumer spending drives roughly 70% of our economy. When there's political discourse (on both sides), people don't want to spend money.
Thinking consumer spending drives most of the economy is your first error -
Thinking consumer spending drives most of the economy is your first errorWeAreAFatLesboSchool said:
Holy shit you just moved the goal posts. Clearly you hate facts.2001400ex said:A little late there wiki boy
But back to my point - its not whose fault it was its why has this fake recovery been so shitty and why did Reagan do so much better?
Hillary will be running for re election in a recession just like McCain
Good luck the rest of the way
To answer this question.... Here's the reason:
https://www.philadelphiafed.org/research-and-data/real-time-center/partisan-conflict-index
The index is an outgrowth of recent Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia research that finds that the index tends to increase near elections and during debates over such contentious policies as the debt ceiling and health-care reform. Research suggests that increased partisan conflict increases uncertainty among firms and households. Such uncertainty has been shown to slow economic activity by delaying business investment and consumer spending.
I've said it a hundred times. Consumer spending drives roughly 70% of our economy. When there's political discourse (on both sides), people don't want to spend money.
Ok genius. What drives the economy then? -
Clinton tried to ramrod Healthcare down Congrefs throat when He took office. It failed miserably and created mistrust to the other side of the aisle to the point He couldn't get shit done until near the end if his 1st term. But Bubba actually had some ambition and reached out to the other side of the aisles leaders and made some deals.2001400ex said:
Come on Race, you are better than that. During Reagan, there was actually agreement on some issues politically. During Clinton there was agreement on issues. During Bush there was a agreement on issues. During Obama.... Nothing.RaceBannon said:I didn't move the goal posts at all. Check back I was repeating a post I made earlier before wiki boy showed up with his bullshit
this is a bullshit recovery with anemic growth bordering on non existent and it belongs to Obama and the democrats. Of course you have been schooled on this many times before here.
there was partisan discord, not discourse, during Reagan. More in fact. Just more bullshit excuses for the failure in chief Obama
People don't want to spend money when they don't have it or don't trust the future. they don't trust Obama or his policies or their job
What's sad is your complete dismissal of Republicans ever doing anything wrong. As if it's all Democrats fault.
You still hate facts.
Obumma took advantage of his sheeple majority and secured all of the votes that He needed BEFORE he even took office. He was stupid enough to think that He would enjoy some super majority and therefore never even tried in 7 years to negotiate allies on the other side of the aisle. He just acted like Royalty and hasn't accomplished anything in his Presidency other than weakening our position in the World and crippling the backbone of this country. The Middle Class.
But yeah. All of that was Bush's fault. -
Couldn't get shit done, except for a major tax hike.salemcoog said:
Clinton tried to ramrod Healthcare down Congrefs throat when He took office. It failed miserably and created mistrust to the other side of the aisle to the point He couldn't get shit done until near the end if his 1st term. But Bubba actually had some ambition and reached out to the other side of the aisles leaders and made some deals.2001400ex said:
Come on Race, you are better than that. During Reagan, there was actually agreement on some issues politically. During Clinton there was agreement on issues. During Bush there was a agreement on issues. During Obama.... Nothing.RaceBannon said:I didn't move the goal posts at all. Check back I was repeating a post I made earlier before wiki boy showed up with his bullshit
this is a bullshit recovery with anemic growth bordering on non existent and it belongs to Obama and the democrats. Of course you have been schooled on this many times before here.
there was partisan discord, not discourse, during Reagan. More in fact. Just more bullshit excuses for the failure in chief Obama
People don't want to spend money when they don't have it or don't trust the future. they don't trust Obama or his policies or their job
What's sad is your complete dismissal of Republicans ever doing anything wrong. As if it's all Democrats fault.
You still hate facts.
Obumma took advantage of his sheeple majority and secured all of the votes that He needed BEFORE he even took office. He was stupid enough to think that He would enjoy some super majority and therefore never even tried in 7 years to negotiate allies on the other side of the aisle. He just acted like Royalty and hasn't accomplished anything in his Presidency other than weakening our position in the World and crippling the backbone of this country. The Middle Class.
But yeah. All of that was Bush's fault.
But still.
Your vision of Obama and blaming it all on him is about the most fucktarded thing I've ever read. That's like saying a dude couldn't get along with his crazy wife and blaming it all on the dude.
Remember this?
"The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president,"


