Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it
Comments
-
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
You edited, THAT?KnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the differenceKnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
Hell ignoring the extreme youth of the offense by pointing to defensive youth just minimizes what an amazing job Kwiatkowski did. Unless you are Alabama and recruit 75% blue chippers, you shouldn't improve on defense after losing 4 top-44 NFL draft picks and pretty much every starter on the front 7. This defense had every right to be mediocre given what they lost. Same with the offense given that they had to replace almost the entire OLine and QB.
-
By polite, you mean ignoring pretty much every point I made to bitch about what you incorrectly think (and have not justified) to be "fudged" numbers?RaceBannon said:
I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the differenceKnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
Derp what?MisterEm said:
You edited, THAT?KnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
Oh no. The numbers were fudged. I showed that quite clearly already. You even agreed. Everyone agrees. Ask around, the numbers were fudged.KnocksvilleE said:
By polite, you mean ignoring pretty much every point I made to bitch about what you incorrectly think (and have not justified) to be "fudged" numbers?RaceBannon said:
I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the differenceKnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all -
Shit post. Just curious, what is your handle on dawgman? Purpledawgfan? Nobody thinks we shouldn't pass at all. We just think we should be more of a run based team. We aren't. We aren't running the air raid, but this is a pass first team which is odd considering the production the RB's are giving us and the fact that the QB is a true freshman.KnocksvilleE said:
Looking at the team's stats, plays like that account for about 68 yards... If you only count players with positive yards, the total goes to 1249 from 1181, bringing the run game to an impressive 107th in the nation! No doubt the run game is better than the numbers suggest since it has improved over the season, but it isn't clear it is good enough to take on the #17 run defense in the nation while the #92 pass defense is left unchecked.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.KnocksvilleE said:
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264
http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/rushing/sort/rushingYards
Even then, running more wouldn't guarantee them 5.8 YPC since other fatigue and stacked boxes would hurt their numbers.
Gaskin and D Wash combined for 26 carries and 148 yards against Utah. There are plenty of facts to prove this team can run the football, but keep informing it and defending the FS coaching that repeatedly does the same thing and fails most of the time.
Against Utah, Peterman called for around 48 passes (39 attempts, 9 Browning runs) and 28 runs (2 were reverses).
Against Oregon, around 40 passes (32 attempts, 8 QB runs/sacks) and 21 RB carries.
Against Cal, 37 passes (28 attempts, 9 QB runs/sacks) and 15 RB carries.
It's ridiculous, it's stupid and the only real argument anyone that tries to argue against this is that Petersen knows more about football than we do. Well no shit, but he's also been trotting out shitty offenses for 4 straight years.
It has very little to nothing to do with Utah's vaunted run D. We aren't balanced. This team is pass heavy every game because that is what Petersen wants to do. It's fucking mind boggling though. We have a very good defense and the RB's, especially Gaskin produce. -
nope. Never agreed.RaceBannon said:
Oh no. The numbers were fudged. I showed that quite clearly already. You even agreed. Everyone agrees. Ask around, the numbers were fudged.KnocksvilleE said:
By polite, you mean ignoring pretty much every point I made to bitch about what you incorrectly think (and have not justified) to be "fudged" numbers?RaceBannon said:
I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the differenceKnocksvilleE said:
Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?RaceBannon said:
I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.KnocksvilleE said:
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
At all
