Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it

12357

Comments

  • RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,123

    Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).

    If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
    Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.

    If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
  • TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 20,071
    If you want to bag on the UW OL, the area to go after it is in their ability to run the ball in situations where EVERYBODY knows that they are going to run the ball.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,660 Founders Club

    But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.
    I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbers
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    edited November 2015

    Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.

    If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
    Looking at the team's stats, plays like that account for about 68 yards... If you only count players with positive yards, the total goes to 1249 from 1181, bringing the run game to an impressive 107th in the nation! No doubt the run game is better than the numbers suggest since it has improved over the season, but it isn't clear it is good enough to take on the #17 run defense in the nation while the #92 pass defense is left unchecked.
    http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264
    http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/rushing/sort/rushingYards


    Even then, running more wouldn't guarantee them 5.8 YPC since other fatigue and stacked boxes would hurt their numbers.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827

    Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.

    If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
    Yep, as I pointed out earlier in the week virtually every RB for the Huskies has a fantastic ypc.

    UW's running game is damn good.
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    I do agree I would rather them run the ball more often, but I understand why they weren't dying to do it to Utah.
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?
    Huh?
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    edited November 2015

    I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbers
    Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, and has started 3 of the last 4 games, and just say we have 2 True Freshmen starting, those are the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could also do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,660 Founders Club

    Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.
    You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upset
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    edited November 2015

    You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upset
    I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignore the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,660 Founders Club

    I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignoring the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.
    I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.

    At all
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    edited November 2015

    I'm not the one crying on and on either. You sound confused. The numbers are fudged though. Of that there is no question.

    At all
    Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?
  • MisterEmMisterEm Member Posts: 6,685

    Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?
    You edited, THAT?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,660 Founders Club

    Then you are clearly deluded. But why am I not surprised you are still crying about the numbers?
    I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the difference
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    Hell ignoring the extreme youth of the offense by pointing to defensive youth just minimizes what an amazing job Kwiatkowski did. Unless you are Alabama and recruit 75% blue chippers, you shouldn't improve on defense after losing 4 top-44 NFL draft picks and pretty much every starter on the front 7. This defense had every right to be mediocre given what they lost. Same with the offense given that they had to replace almost the entire OLine and QB.
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75

    I am politely answering your posts. Not crying. You need to know the difference
    By polite, you mean ignoring pretty much every point I made to bitch about what you incorrectly think (and have not justified) to be "fudged" numbers?
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75
    MisterEm said:

    You edited, THAT?
    Derp what?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 112,660 Founders Club

    By polite, you mean ignoring pretty much every point I made to bitch about what you incorrectly think (and have not justified) to be "fudged" numbers?
    Oh no. The numbers were fudged. I showed that quite clearly already. You even agreed. Everyone agrees. Ask around, the numbers were fudged.
  • KnocksvilleEKnocksvilleE Member Posts: 75

    Oh no. The numbers were fudged. I showed that quite clearly already. You even agreed. Everyone agrees. Ask around, the numbers were fudged.
    nope. Never agreed.
Sign In or Register to comment.