Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it
Comments
-
KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Okay I thought you were disagreeing with me. NVMTequilla said:
You missed the point big time ...KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out. -
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness. -
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
-
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
