Petersen Pissed Away the Utah Game, but he won't Admit it
Comments
-
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter? -
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter? -
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
Huskies aren't THAT much better at running the ball to excuse ignoring the fact that they would be running against the 17th ranked run defense instead of passing against the 92nd ranked pass defense.RoadDawg55 said:
Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.
The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year.
Stanford's running game is FAR FAR better than their passing game and Oregon's run defense still sucks. I expect Stanford can run against almost anyone. The Huskies, not so much... They have to be more strategic.
As for the cutsie plays, I agree those are annoying as hell. And Lindquist is no Tim Tebow or Blake Bell so they need to give that up. But Peterson should eventually change. Coaches are stubborn, even great ones. -
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
At first I read the headline as "Petersen passed away at the Utah game".
What a fucking disappointment that turned out to be. -
You missed the point big time ...KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out. -
These are the kinds of comments that shine a glaring light on identity, vision, plan, mission ... pick your favorite buzz wordRoadDawg55 said:
Sometimes, regardless of what the other team is good at, you stick with what you do best. What we do best is run the ball.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
When Stanford plays Oregon this weekend, they will run the shit out of the ball despite Oregon having a porous pass defense. Same goes for when they play Utah.
The excuses for this staff are beyond old. If they cut the cutesy bullshit and played to the strength of the team, which is clearly running the ball, this season would look a lot better and we would all be pumped about next year. -
KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Okay I thought you were disagreeing with me. NVMTequilla said:
You missed the point big time ...KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Anybody that watches Utah knows that running the ball on them is tough sledding and that in the defensive backfield they aren't going to have the elite athletes that other teams have that you normally associate with strong pass defenses. I don't need to see the ranking numbers to figure that out. -
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness. -
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
-
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.KnocksvilleE said:
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself. -
If you want to bag on the UW OL, the area to go after it is in their ability to run the ball in situations where EVERYBODY knows that they are going to run the ball.
-
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
Looking at the team's stats, plays like that account for about 68 yards... If you only count players with positive yards, the total goes to 1249 from 1181, bringing the run game to an impressive 107th in the nation! No doubt the run game is better than the numbers suggest since it has improved over the season, but it isn't clear it is good enough to take on the #17 run defense in the nation while the #92 pass defense is left unchecked.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.KnocksvilleE said:
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
http://espn.go.com/college-football/team/stats/_/id/264
http://espn.go.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/stat/rushing/sort/rushingYards
Even then, running more wouldn't guarantee them 5.8 YPC since other fatigue and stacked boxes would hurt their numbers. -
Yep, as I pointed out earlier in the week virtually every RB for the Huskies has a fantastic ypc.RoadDawg55 said:
Sacks and plays like Durkee dropping a punt for -27 yards greatly contribute to the low ranking. Gaskin and D-Wash are averaging over 5.8 ypc. That is good. This is the first UW OL I have seen in years that actually moves the DL off the line. We finally have some maulers and not the pussies that made up the Cascade Front. This young OL is far better at run blocking than pass blocking.KnocksvilleE said:
Stanford's Rushing Defense is ranked #15 in total yards and #24 in YPC while Washington's is 113 in total yards and 84th in YPC. Stanford can run on whoever they want. Washinton, not so much. Hell, Washington ranks better in passing than running at 71 in total yards and 54 in YPA (Washington state has a lower YPA!).RoadDawg55 said:KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
Nice yeah, but still. I would have never predicted you would have this dumbass response.KnocksvilleE said:
Are you comparing the Husky's run game to Stanford's?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE.
If Washington ran the ball against Utah, it would have been weakness on Utah's best strength. Instead it is Washington's kinda weakness on Utah's blaring weakness.
If you honestly believe UW is better at throwing the ball, kill yourself.
UW's running game is damn good. -
I do agree I would rather them run the ball more often, but I understand why they weren't dying to do it to Utah.
-
Huh?RoadDawg55 said:
Answer the fucking question. When Stanford plays Oregon and Utah, do you think they will air it out?KnocksvilleE said:
92 vs 17 is a mssive difference. What the fuck are you seeing that makes you ignore such a massive disparity?Tequilla said:
I don't need to use my eyes to look at numbers when I've watched enough of Utah to understand what they are and aren't good at.KnocksvilleE said:
Everyone on this board didn't check out Utah's defensive stats apparentlyDennis_DeYoung said:Nail on the head. Great poonts.
If you coach at Washington, you need to be run first.
I want to puke when he talks about Dawg weather. He is a fucking pass happy faggot who practices indoors when it rains.
It's fucking startling incompetence. I hate offense first/pass first fag coaches.
Whittingham outclassed Pete by simply doing the thing that made sense.
Fuck. I hate Pete's fucking bullshit.
Everyone on this bored knew: RUN THE BALL 30 TIMES TO GASKIN AND YOU WIN.
How could Pete not know that? It's not that he doesn't know it, it's just that he feels no pressure to win, doesn't give a fuck about stealing money from our fans and wants to prove he's right more than he wants to prove he knows how to win.
It's a fucking joke. FMFYFE. -
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, and has started 3 of the last 4 games, and just say we have 2 True Freshmen starting, those are the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could also do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE -
I'm not the one crying on and on about supposedly "fudged" numbers to ignore the obvious point that the offense is younger than the defense.RaceBannon said:
You know it doesn't really seem like its my panties that are in a wad here. You sound upsetKnocksvilleE said:
Would it unwad your panties if I said 2 Freshmen starters and another that plays more than the "starter"? Hell even if we ignored the fact that Gaskin has more than 2.7x the number of rushes as Washington, say we have 2 true freshmen starting, those the QB (who plays nearly every offensive down) and the LT. Calling that 19% of the offense, which you could do if they were a WR and TE who rotate every other play, is misleading at best, bafflingly stupid at worst.RaceBannon said:
I dismiss your fudging of the numbers because you fudged the numbersKnocksvilleE said:
But I pointed out why I didn't. You just keep dismissing my responses for idiotic reasons.RaceBannon said:
I pointed out quite clearly where you fudged your numbers. You just referenced it again.KnocksvilleE said:
So what numbers did I fudge? As I said, Gaskin has been the starter every game since Oregon, except for the Utah game (though he ran during the first drive and more than Washington anyway). And he has far more carries than Washington anyway.RaceBannon said:
OkKnocksvilleE said:
Keep telling yourself that.RaceBannon said:
But I'm still right and you still fudged the numbers to make a bad pointKnocksvilleE said:
Before Washington's first fumble, Gaskin ran 5 times to Washington's 3, 6 to 4 before Washington's second fumble. So tell me again what it means that Washington was the starter? And Gaskin has been the starter for every game since Oregon (until Utah).RaceBannon said:
Had he started 3 freshman the idiot he did start wouldn't have fumbled twice and gave up a TD which kind of makes your point even more lame if that is even possibleKnocksvilleE said:
Nah you didn't stutter. You are just being stupid. What does it mean to be a starter if you play less than a backup?RaceBannon said:
No its 2 because it isn't trivial its a fact. So 19% of the offense is true freshmen compared to 0%. That's a little not a lot like I said.KnocksvilleE said:
3 True Freshmen (including the QB) to Zero. That is a lot.RaceBannon said:
He didn't start the freshman RB. That's not a hell of a lot, its a littleKnocksvilleE said:
Nope:doogsinparadise said:
Funny how the defense has young starters and key subs, yet aren't out there fucking the dog.PurpleJ said:
Race. We have a GREAT defense and the offense is only struggling because they are YOUNG. You are the worst type of Huskie fan.RaceBannon said:We want a need a great coach. Period end of fucking story. Not interested in seeing if Petersen can improve to mediocre.
Defensive starters: 4 SRs, 2 JRs, 5 SOs, 0 FR
Offensive starters: 3 SRs, 1 JR, 4 SOs, 3 FR (including QB, RB, and LT)
Offense is a hell of a lot younger than Defense
Gaskin was the starter for the last few games before the Utah game and he is probably going to be for the AZ State game as well. And the True Freshman RB is getting a hell of a lot more carries than the Jr this season. So saying he wasn't the starter for the Utah game is trivial.
Did I stutter?
thanks for dropping by now LEAVE
