Cutcliffe has never heard of Vegas
So here's some reality ...
Degenerate gamblers, and those who make money will never allow this to happen.
What would happen, you have to refund your winnings?
Second thing ...
Win big enough so you don't have to defend 8 laterals and 4 bad calls.
Comments
-
This is a bad take and you should feel bad.topdawgnc said:"The NCAA should have a process to reverse the outcome of the game," Cutcliffe said in his Sunday news conference. "Nothing has changed other than they realized they got the replay wrong."
So here's some reality ...
Degenerate gamblers, and those who make money will never allow this to happen.
What would happen, you have to refund your winnings?
Second thing ...
Win big enough so you don't have to defend 8 laterals and 4 bad calls. -
If that happened to UW you would probably be singing a different tune.topdawgnc said:"The NCAA should have a process to reverse the outcome of the game," Cutcliffe said in his Sunday news conference. "Nothing has changed other than they realized they got the replay wrong."
So here's some reality ...
Degenerate gamblers, and those who make money will never allow this to happen.
What would happen, you have to refund your winnings?
Second thing ...
Win big enough so you don't have to defend 8 laterals and 4 bad calls. -
DerekJohnson said:
If that happened to UW you would probably be singing a different tune.topdawgnc said:"The NCAA should have a process to reverse the outcome of the game," Cutcliffe said in his Sunday news conference. "Nothing has changed other than they realized they got the replay wrong."
So here's some reality ...
Degenerate gamblers, and those who make money will never allow this to happen.
What would happen, you have to refund your winnings?
Second thing ...
Win big enough so you don't have to defend 8 laterals and 4 bad calls.
Wrong:
Before a Husky fan ... I support degenerate gambler laws.
-
Casinos have rules about score changes. Most pay out on the final score even if it was adjusted later. Recall the 2011 SC-Utah game where the Condoms blocked a FG and returned it for a TD, but the refs threw a flag during the run back and nullified the TD. Later the Pac 12 ruled it should've been a TD and changed the score from 17-14 to 23-14. Most Vegas books told SC bettors to fuck off and would only honor Utah bettors as the line was SC -8 or -8.5.
-
The Fabulous Sports Babe - "score more points"doogsinparadise said:
This is a bad take and you should feel bad.topdawgnc said:"The NCAA should have a process to reverse the outcome of the game," Cutcliffe said in his Sunday news conference. "Nothing has changed other than they realized they got the replay wrong."
So here's some reality ...
Degenerate gamblers, and those who make money will never allow this to happen.
What would happen, you have to refund your winnings?
Second thing ...
Win big enough so you don't have to defend 8 laterals and 4 bad calls. -
That was an illegal play with no time left on the clock.
Duke wins.
