Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Aubbie?

2»

Comments

  • Gladstone
    Gladstone Member Posts: 16,425
    How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    edited September 2013
    Gladstone said:

    How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.

    Ole Miss teenage boy stocking superiority guy here. Coach Blindside and his staff are extremely well liked by the kids for one. Also, they had that #1 recruit's older brother which is the reason they got baby bro. Last year was a confluence of lucky connections and good recruiting, kind of like last year's UW hoops could have been if Romar knew how to close.




























    Also, the boosters really stepped up. Hotty Toddy!

  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133

    The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?

    It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
    well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680

    The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?

    It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
    well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
    It's a shame that Washington is the only program in the country that suffers from attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,304 Founders Club
    The Huskies have filled NFL rosters with early entry guys
  • Mohun
    Mohun Member Posts: 32

    The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?

    It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
    well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
    Recruiting their replacements, is on the coach.

    HTH

  • CFetters_Nacho_Lover
    CFetters_Nacho_Lover Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 32,950 Founders Club

    The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?

    It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
    well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
    Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?

    You're better than that.
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?

    It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.
    well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coach
    Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?

    You're better than that.
    disagree