Aubbie?
Comments
-
Go Rebels!
-
-
The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
-
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
-
CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
I do. So does Ole Miss.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
-
I thought Sark was a great recruiter?
-
Everyone says so.RaceBannon said:I thought Sark was a great recruiter?
-
Read my other post. We are NOT young now.
-
SEC young >>>> PAC 12 young, old, gay, black, mormon
hth -
Yes. The national champions from last year disagree.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
They played 12 freshmen and rotated between 3 and 4 freshmen starters per week and 8 or more on the 2 deeps.
I will take a young team and a natty over experienced redshirt juniors all-around.
-
How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.
-
Ole Miss teenage boy stocking superiority guy here. Coach Blindside and his staff are extremely well liked by the kids for one. Also, they had that #1 recruit's older brother which is the reason they got baby bro. Last year was a confluence of lucky connections and good recruiting, kind of like last year's UW hoops could have been if Romar knew how to close.Gladstone said:How in the hell did Ol Miss reel in a top ten recruiting class, including the #1 prospect out of Georgia. I guess the boosters are stepping up.
Also, the boosters really stepped up. Hotty Toddy!
-
well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coachCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
-
It's a shame that Washington is the only program in the country that suffers from attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coachCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
-
The Huskies have filled NFL rosters with early entry guys
-
Recruiting their replacements, is on the coach.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coachCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
HTH
-
Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coachCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
You're better than that. -
disagreeCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
Here I've been promoting you for the front page and then you come back with this?puppylove_sugarsteel said:
well there's attrition, early NFL defectors, injuries etc., things not on the coachCFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
It's year fucking 5. If UW is still starting young players (which by the way, they're really not), that shit falls on the head coach for not recruiting well enough and not developing well enough.Auburndawg said:The point of the article is that starting young players generally isn't a good thing. Anyone really disagree with that?
You're better than that.
