Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Can we hire Sark back?
Comments
-
Sark or Petersen, the results are about the same. With the exception of 2013 (9 wins! Fuck you Wilcox) at least one element of this team has been a abject failure each year since 2009 (year before that was perfection, obviously).
-
Got destroyed by LSU, Oregon, and USC. Beat a crippled Stanford team. Like all of "signature" wins by this team in the last 15 years, it came against a team with no QB.greenblood said:
They played better LSU, Oregon, Stanford, and USC teams.MisterEm said:
Disagree. There was an offensive pulse in 2012.MrsPetersen said:2012 was pretty shitty at CenturyLink http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/team/756/scoring/offense/gamelog.html
HTH -
From what I watched, this game reminded me of the LSU game in 2012. I know Stanford is better, but that was way too easy. That LSU was better than this Stanford team.
-
Exactly, Aaron Corp and Nunez are the two who bought shitty coaches so much time.
-
Lou Holtz won a NC at Notre Shame in year three. He took over a team worse than 2013 Washington. What's Petersen going to to do? 8-5?
-
Let's promote JSmif to AD so he could one up Haden by hiring Sark back.PurpleJ said:Let's promote JSmif to head coach.
-
If Sark didn't have fetal alcohol syndrome, the disaster that Petersen is would be national news. That USC win is saving his life. Even the pussy media would see the obvious if he lost that game.Meek said:Exactly, Aaron Corp and Nunez are the two who bought shitty coaches so much time.
-
Lets be honest, Tyrone had better offense than this drekwhatshouldicareabout said:I don't care how drunk he is, the offense was never as bad as what we've had the last 2 years
