Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

UW +19 @ the Tree. O/u 47.5

2

Comments

  • CheersWestDawg
    CheersWestDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,480 Swaye's Wigwam

    I'd eat the points and take Stanford and the under. I don't think UW scores in the double digits. I'm going 30-6 Cardinal.

    This. With a fucking bullet.

    Fuck everybody.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Wow that is a lot higher than I anticipated.

    Maybe I am drinking the kool aid but I put down 3 units on UW plus the points.

    Stanford has yet to face a rushing defense in the top 60 in the nation in opponent yards per rush attempt. UW is tied for 20th at 3.4.

    Vizcaino's strong leg will also eliminate McCaffrey as a KO return threat (as will UW's offense never scoring.)

    Shaw is over due for some dumb coaching decisions and when he sees the ineptitude of the UW offense I think he will be content playing it safe and settling for FGs and punts.

    I see this setting up as a good ol' fashioned moral victory. Say, 22-13?

    Didn't Oregon get some opportunities in the return game last week? I remember one return went for about 90 yards or so.
    Yeah and Vizcaino made the TD-saving tackle. I just hope he isn't hurt.

    That was the only time in Pac-12 play this year that UW's opponent started a drive past the 26 yard line after a kickoff (admittedly a small sample size.)
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,679
    Lot higher than I thought too. I thought it would be around 13.

    CFN thinks Stanford will win 35-13 due to Browning probably not playing and the Husky OL not being very good:

    collegefootballnews.com/2015/washington-vs-stanford-preview
  • phineas
    phineas Member Posts: 4,732
    I like the Dawgs in this one
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855

    Watch, with Browning out we will run 70% of the time and win 17-13.

    2002 Oregon game redux? Chico McLatcher in the Shelton Sampson role?
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,636 Swaye's Wigwam
    dnc said:

    Watch, with Browning out we will run 70% of the time and win 17-13.

    2002 Oregon game redux? Chico Charlie McLatcher McClutchins in the Shelton Sampson role?
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    The line was delayed a few days...it could be pricing in the risk KJCS starts.

    FWIW - I think this is the best Stanford has played offensively since Andrew Luck. Defensively this may be their worst team since early Harbaugh.

    Over is the play.
  • FremontTroll
    FremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    The line was delayed a few days...it could be pricing in the risk KJCS starts.

    FWIW - I think this is the best Stanford has played offensively since Andrew Luck. Defensively this may be their worst team since early Harbaugh.

    Over is the play.

    Yes of course that is why the line didn't come out until Friday.

    Reading into CP's press conference...I think Browning starts.

    I don't know how much it matters with how inept the UW offense is with Browning in there. No matter who is starting the game plan should be to pound the rock.