UW +19 @ the Tree. O/u 47.5
Maybe I am drinking the kool aid but I put down 3 units on UW plus the points.
Stanford has yet to face a rushing defense in the top 60 in the nation in opponent yards per rush attempt. UW is tied for 20th at 3.4.
Vizcaino's strong leg will also eliminate McCaffrey as a KO return threat (as will UW's offense never scoring.)
Shaw is over due for some dumb coaching decisions and when he sees the ineptitude of the UW offense I think he will be content playing it safe and settling for FGs and punts.
I see this setting up as a good ol' fashioned moral victory. Say, 22-13?
Comments
-
We're? BACK!!!FremontTroll said:Wow that is a lot higher than I anticipated.
Maybe I am drinking the kool aid but I put down 3 units on UW plus the points.
Stanford has yet to face a rushing defense in the top 60 in the nation in opponent yards per rush attempt. UW is tied for 20th at 3.4.
Vizcaino's strong leg will also eliminate McCaffrey as a KO return threat (as will UW's offense never scoring.)
Shaw is over due for some dumb coaching decisions and when he sees the ineptitude of the UW offense I think he will be content playing it safe and settling for FGs and punts.
I see this setting up as a good ol' fashioned moral victory. Say, 22-13? -
+ 19 to Stanfraud...that's sickening
Yeah I know they're good at football now. We need to be good at football too.
I'd still take UW vs that kind of spread. -
Lay the poonts.
Plungers.gif -
UW and the points seems like the smart bet, but I would never bet on this team or coach. I remember in 2011, my buddy put $250 on UW against Stanford. The line was +20 and UW was 5-1 at the time. I was thinking it was easy money, but Stanford broke out the plunger.
-
dnc said:
Lay the poonts.
Plungers.gif
-
2011 vs. 2015RoadDawg55 said:UW and the points seems like the smart bet, but I would never bet on this team or coach. I remember in 2011, my buddy put $250 on UW against Stanford. The line was +20 and UW was 5-1 at the time. I was thinking it was easy money, but Stanford broke out the plunger.
Team sucks/Team sucks
Team is overrated/Team is not rated
Team shown propensity to give up points by the truckload/Team shown propensity to lose "close" low-scoring games
As a fan, win just win.
As a bettor taking the points- one of these things is not like the other.
-
I'll take the field.
-
2011's d was horrible. This one is good and Hogan's Heroes is a serviceable qb but he's not going to light up any scoreboards. If they can't contain Ed McCaffrey's son, there's a problem.
-
Didn't Oregon get some opportunities in the return game last week? I remember one return went for about 90 yards or so.FremontTroll said:Wow that is a lot higher than I anticipated.
Maybe I am drinking the kool aid but I put down 3 units on UW plus the points.
Stanford has yet to face a rushing defense in the top 60 in the nation in opponent yards per rush attempt. UW is tied for 20th at 3.4.
Vizcaino's strong leg will also eliminate McCaffrey as a KO return threat (as will UW's offense never scoring.)
Shaw is over due for some dumb coaching decisions and when he sees the ineptitude of the UW offense I think he will be content playing it safe and settling for FGs and punts.
I see this setting up as a good ol' fashioned moral victory. Say, 22-13? -
I'd eat the points and take Stanford and the under. I don't think UW scores in the double digits. I'm going 30-6 Cardinal.
