Here is the problem with Sark.....

RaceBannon said:

I saw many a Lambo team lay down and quit

dnc said:

Steve_Bowman said:

Actually, the option was Gilbertson...Rick didn't get in the way.

Another crappy head coach, but one hell of O coordinator.

The one thing I give Jim, is his teams were tough. None of the pussy soft crap we see now.

dnc said:

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Steve_Bowman said:

Lambo may not have been a great coach, but but shitty? His teams we're tough....they still hurt people. Ask Shark's sorry BYU ass about how shitty his teams were.

Plus, Jim could recruit. I believe the 2000 team were mostly his guys except for Alexis and John Anderson (the kicker.)

Anderson was actually his recruit but he was a shitty coach. That 1994, 1996 and 1997 teams had top 10 talent and lost 4, 3 and 4 games.

His personally cost us a Rose Bowl in 1995 with his coaching blunders against Notre Dame, USC and Oregon that year.

Also that 2000 team may have been his guys but if he were head coach that team goes 8-4 at best.

Bingo. Think Lambright would have been flexible enough to switch to the option because two of his players suggested it? Hell no. That team won because of Lambo's players and Rick's coaching.

Bull. Gilby never ran option before RN made the switch after starting 0-2. Sure they all worked together, but if you really think Gilby was the OC on that team I have a bright shiny Kiesau to sell you.

Also, TUFF teams don't got beaten by lesser teams on a regular basis.

As Pat Hill should have already taught you, the stache doesn't make the man.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

RaceBannon said:

I saw many a Lambo team lay down and quit

'94 Apple Cup....wasn't on tv (except for Fleenor's private feed) but they lost 23-6. Rondeau didn't say it but you could sense it. Also, see '95 Sun Bowel and a couple games in '98.

Even his "good" teams got plunger raped like in 1996 at Notre Dame, 1997 at UCLA, 1998 he had a few including the Nebraska one.

From 1984-2013 the Cougars have only defeated the Huskies by more than a touchdown one time and that was the 26-6 win in 1994.

He_Needs_More_Time said:

He is what we feared Ty was going to be. Nobody thought Ty was going to be the disaster that he was when he was hired. Most were pissed because we feared Ty would be just good enough to keep our idiot Doogs happy but never good enough to lead us to a Rose Bowl.

That is what Sark is. I can't see the Huskies going through a bowl drought under him but I honestly can't ever picture him leading us to a Rose Bowl. This year he might win 9 games or 10. Next year he might win 10 or 11 only because our schedule is a joke. Both years we'll get plunger raped 2-3 times if not more. Not even come close to winning the conference title.

When Sark gets a 6th year he'll be the first Husky coach to see a year six without winning a conference title since Ralph Welch did who coached from 1942-1947. He did however lose a Rose Bowl in 1943.

I guess Sark is hoping to be on the James Phelan plan who coached at UW from 1930-1941 and didn't win a conference title until 1936 when he lost the Rose Bowl to finished the season ranked 5th in the nation.

You have to go back almost 80 years the last time a UW coach received a sixth year who didn't win a conference title or go to a Rose Bowl within his first five years on the job.

We know what we have in Sark. He's not "learning on the job" still. His mistakes in year one are still here. He still doesn't know how to take the 3 points, instead goes for it on fourth and short out of the shot gun so it's stuffed, his OL is actually worse the longer he's been here, the defense has been shaky to downright terrible during his tenure.

Why are we "letting it play out" ? We know Sark fucking blows. This team at best will go 8-4 in the regular season. Fans wanted Lambo fired for going 8-4 in 1997, fans weren't jacked up when Rick went 8-4 in 2001 either.

Sark is what we all feared Ty was going to be. I can't believe so many of you are falling I


3-0 and who gives a fuck if you see Sark leading us to a rose bowl. I, and anyone with a clue, gave this year for Sark to at least win the North. Now you've got the 2 best teams in the country in your division. A better division than both SEC splits.

It is what it is. I want Sark to put up or hit the fucking soup line, but just look at the schedule. Alabama would lose two with UW's slate. IT IS WHAT IT IS. Put UW in the south and its a different story altogether