PM to UWDoogpound
Oh but Sark is just a young coach right? Fucking rusty butter knife coated with aids and acid, your limp fucking wrists. I'll let you dumbfucks figure out the rest.
/keeley%20hazell/keeley-hazell-20d.jpg)
Comments
-
If you could distill the essence of HH into one post, this is pretty much it.haie said:I know some of you faggots read this bored. You're all piece of shit doogs and I'm glad your cum-slurping minions are frantically trying to delete posts and play the "Pray for Sark" game to cover up the fact that you got in line directly behind Woody to explore Sark's beer shit-vomiting asshole.
Oh but Sark is just a young coach right? Fucking rusty butter knife coated with aids and acid, your limp fucking wrists. I'll let you dumbfucks figure out the rest.
-
Needs more Keeley though.WilburHooksHands said:
If you could distill the essence of HH into one post, this is pretty much it.haie said:I know some of you faggots read this bored. You're all piece of shit doogs and I'm glad your cum-slurping minions are frantically trying to delete posts and play the "Pray for Sark" game to cover up the fact that you got in line directly behind Woody to explore Sark's beer shit-vomiting asshole.
Oh but Sark is just a young coach right? Fucking rusty butter knife coated with aids and acid, your limp fucking wrists. I'll let you dumbfucks figure out the rest. -
I hate those guys, fucking bunch of rah rah cunts.
-
time to line up a few screen names....
-
TruthTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Needs more Keeley though.WilburHooksHands said:
If you could distill the essence of HH into one post, this is pretty much it.haie said:I know some of you faggots read this bored. You're all piece of shit doogs and I'm glad your cum-slurping minions are frantically trying to delete posts and play the "Pray for Sark" game to cover up the fact that you got in line directly behind Woody to explore Sark's beer shit-vomiting asshole.
Oh but Sark is just a young coach right? Fucking rusty butter knife coated with aids and acid, your limp fucking wrists. I'll let you dumbfucks figure out the rest. -
@thegekko's silence speaks volumes.
-
-
They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth. -
Lmfaodoogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth.
Good christ
Needed more words in all caps.
And if that quote doesn't inspire DJ to bring back sig...ftg -
I am shaking and about to vomit.doogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth. -
That's it. Underboob wins. Fuck sideboob.haie said:I know some of you faggots read this bored. You're all piece of shit doogs and I'm glad your cum-slurping minions are frantically trying to delete posts and play the "Pray for Sark" game to cover up the fact that you got in line directly behind Woody to explore Sark's beer shit-vomiting asshole.
Oh but Sark is just a young coach right? Fucking rusty butter knife coated with aids and acid, your limp fucking wrists. I'll let you dumbfucks figure out the rest. -
no words.....except he isn't a dawg you idiot..doogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth. -
thanks for readingdoogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth.
-
doogville said:
They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth.
-
Shouldn't you be quoting Sark in the Sark goes to rehab thread?Joe Stephanson said:
I am shaking and about to vomit.doogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth. -
They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF"
-
^^^ KrisVashon?
-
Dooged that for youRaceBannon said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF" -
Has to be a parody post.doogville said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a Dawg. And Dawgs travel in packs, never alone and never without hope. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still barks for you. WOOF"
Chris Landon, ladies and gentlemen. Holy shit. I just threw up in my mouth.
Has to be.
jfc -
@DerekJohnson give the man 1000 rank points for use of "paeans". A bonus 250 points for having it within five words from txtspk abbreviations.RaceBannon said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF" -
I don't understand anything in this post.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@DerekJohnson give the man 1000 rank points for use of "paeans". A bonus 250 points for having it within five words from txtspk abbreviations.RaceBannon said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF" -
Welcome to my world.Swaye said:
I don't understand anything in this post.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@DerekJohnson give the man 1000 rank points for use of "paeans". A bonus 250 points for having it within five words from txtspk abbreviations.RaceBannon said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF" -
He should read your PMs from me for a dayDerekJohnson said:
Welcome to my world.Swaye said:
I don't understand anything in this post.GrundleStiltzkin said:
@DerekJohnson give the man 1000 rank points for use of "paeans". A bonus 250 points for having it within five words from txtspk abbreviations.RaceBannon said:They are writing fucking paeans to sark over there! Omfg:
"But Sark is a DAWG. And DAWGS travel in PACKS, never alone and NEVER without HOPE. Godspeed, Coach. Husky nation still BARKS for you. WOOF" -
Here is my reply. Like that shit and turn it purple so its as gay as the rest of that blog:
A footnote in history
That is how the Sark era will be remembered. An unremarkable period of mediocrity sandwiched between the Dark Ages and Renaissance of Husky Football.
Chris is right that it is unfair to expect any UW coach to match Don James. But it is just as unfair to use two of the worst coaches in the history of college football as the benchmark merely because they immediately preceded Sark as head coaches of UW.
UW emerged from the dark ages the day TW was fired. Any decent coach could have won 4-5+ games with the 2009 UW roster and in fact, before Sark had ever coached his first game at UW and before anyone knew anything about him as a head coach, that was the predicted over/under for the 2009 season: 4 wins. In my opinion that was Sark’s best year winning 5 because it should have been 6 if not for the rigged Notre Dame game. From there on out he may have felt like he was playing with "house money" but after an initial mildly successful season the trend line completely bottomed out.
Sark shouldn’t be judged against Don James and he shouldn’t be judged against TW or Gilbertson. He should be judged by the competition- his contemporaries. And by that measure Sark was stupendously average. Here is his record against P12 coaches over the past 6+ years:
Losing record:
Kelly 0-4
Mora 0-2
Harbaugh 0-2
Erickson 0-2
Helfrich 0-1
Graham 1-2
Shaw 2-3
Kiffin 1-2
Chris Petersen 1-2
.500 record vs:
Mike Stoops 1-1
Neuheisel 1-1
Winning record vs:
Tedford 4-0
Wulff 3-0
Embree 2-0
MacIntyre 2-0
Dykes 2-0
Kish 1-0
Carroll 1-0
Riley 4-2
RichRod 2-1
Whittingham 2-1
Leach 2-1
For the most part Sark got beat by good coaches/programs and beat bad coaches/programs. The exception being his upset of Carroll in 2009 and his domination of Tedford which ultimately got Tedford fired. As Stringer Bell would say:
"That’s good. That’s like a 40-degree day. Ain’t nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day. Fifty. Bring a smile to your face. Sixty, people is damn near barbecuing on that motherf***er Go down to 20, they get their bitch on. Get their blood complaining. But forty? Nobody give a crap about 40. Nobody remember 40, and y’all is giving me way too many 40-degree days!"
Sark was a 40 degree day whose main claim to fame was that it had been negative 10 for the previous two days.
-
God damn mediocre weather motherfucker.
-
If you use logic and facts on that site you will be called a Duck troll and banned. Happened to me after ASU fail mary loss and again after Stanford plunger rape at Husky stadium. There's been a few so I forget which one. I don't even bother fucking with them anymore, it's not even fun.FremontTroll said:Here is my reply. Like that shit and turn it purple so its as gay as the rest of that blog:
A footnote in history
That is how the Sark era will be remembered. An unremarkable period of mediocrity sandwiched between the Dark Ages and Renaissance of Husky Football.
Chris is right that it is unfair to expect any UW coach to match Don James. But it is just as unfair to use two of the worst coaches in the history of college football as the benchmark merely because they immediately preceded Sark as head coaches of UW.
UW emerged from the dark ages the day TW was fired. Any decent coach could have won 4-5+ games with the 2009 UW roster and in fact, before Sark had ever coached his first game at UW and before anyone knew anything about him as a head coach, that was the predicted over/under for the 2009 season: 4 wins. In my opinion that was Sark’s best year winning 5 because it should have been 6 if not for the rigged Notre Dame game. From there on out he may have felt like he was playing with "house money" but after an initial mildly successful season the trend line completely bottomed out.
Sark shouldn’t be judged against Don James and he shouldn’t be judged against TW or Gilbertson. He should be judged by the competition- his contemporaries. And by that measure Sark was stupendously average. Here is his record against P12 coaches over the past 6+ years:
Losing record:
Kelly 0-4
Mora 0-2
Harbaugh 0-2
Erickson 0-2
Helfrich 0-1
Graham 1-2
Shaw 2-3
Kiffin 1-2
Chris Petersen 1-2
.500 record vs:
Mike Stoops 1-1
Neuheisel 1-1
Winning record vs:
Tedford 4-0
Wulff 3-0
Embree 2-0
MacIntyre 2-0
Dykes 2-0
Kish 1-0
Carroll 1-0
Riley 4-2
RichRod 2-1
Whittingham 2-1
Leach 2-1
For the most part Sark got beat by good coaches/programs and beat bad coaches/programs. The exception being his upset of Carroll in 2009 and his domination of Tedford which ultimately got Tedford fired. As Stringer Bell would say:
"That’s good. That’s like a 40-degree day. Ain’t nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day. Fifty. Bring a smile to your face. Sixty, people is damn near barbecuing on that motherf***er Go down to 20, they get their bitch on. Get their blood complaining. But forty? Nobody give a crap about 40. Nobody remember 40, and y’all is giving me way too many 40-degree days!"
Sark was a 40 degree day whose main claim to fame was that it had been negative 10 for the previous two days. -
^THIS^ QUALITY.FremontTroll said:Here is my reply. Like that shit and turn it purple so its as gay as the rest of that blog:
A footnote in history
That is how the Sark era will be remembered. An unremarkable period of mediocrity sandwiched between the Dark Ages and Renaissance of Husky Football.
Chris is right that it is unfair to expect any UW coach to match Don James. But it is just as unfair to use two of the worst coaches in the history of college football as the benchmark merely because they immediately preceded Sark as head coaches of UW.
UW emerged from the dark ages the day TW was fired. Any decent coach could have won 4-5+ games with the 2009 UW roster and in fact, before Sark had ever coached his first game at UW and before anyone knew anything about him as a head coach, that was the predicted over/under for the 2009 season: 4 wins. In my opinion that was Sark’s best year winning 5 because it should have been 6 if not for the rigged Notre Dame game. From there on out he may have felt like he was playing with "house money" but after an initial mildly successful season the trend line completely bottomed out.
Sark shouldn’t be judged against Don James and he shouldn’t be judged against TW or Gilbertson. He should be judged by the competition- his contemporaries. And by that measure Sark was stupendously average. Here is his record against P12 coaches over the past 6+ years:
Losing record:
Kelly 0-4
Mora 0-2
Harbaugh 0-2
Erickson 0-2
Helfrich 0-1
Graham 1-2
Shaw 2-3
Kiffin 1-2
Chris Petersen 1-2
.500 record vs:
Mike Stoops 1-1
Neuheisel 1-1
Winning record vs:
Tedford 4-0
Wulff 3-0
Embree 2-0
MacIntyre 2-0
Dykes 2-0
Kish 1-0
Carroll 1-0
Riley 4-2
RichRod 2-1
Whittingham 2-1
Leach 2-1
For the most part Sark got beat by good coaches/programs and beat bad coaches/programs. The exception being his upset of Carroll in 2009 and his domination of Tedford which ultimately got Tedford fired. As Stringer Bell would say:
"That’s good. That’s like a 40-degree day. Ain’t nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day. Fifty. Bring a smile to your face. Sixty, people is damn near barbecuing on that motherf***er Go down to 20, they get their bitch on. Get their blood complaining. But forty? Nobody give a crap about 40. Nobody remember 40, and y’all is giving me way too many 40-degree days!"
Sark was a 40 degree day whose main claim to fame was that it had been negative 10 for the previous two days. -
We lost to Utah?
-
Doogs hate facts.ForeverYoung said:
If you use logic and facts on that site you will be called a Duck troll and banned. Happened to me after ASU fail mary loss and again after Stanford plunger rape at Husky stadium. There's been a few so I forget which one. I don't even bother fucking with them anymore, it's not even fun.FremontTroll said:Here is my reply. Like that shit and turn it purple so its as gay as the rest of that blog:
A footnote in history
That is how the Sark era will be remembered. An unremarkable period of mediocrity sandwiched between the Dark Ages and Renaissance of Husky Football.
Chris is right that it is unfair to expect any UW coach to match Don James. But it is just as unfair to use two of the worst coaches in the history of college football as the benchmark merely because they immediately preceded Sark as head coaches of UW.
UW emerged from the dark ages the day TW was fired. Any decent coach could have won 4-5+ games with the 2009 UW roster and in fact, before Sark had ever coached his first game at UW and before anyone knew anything about him as a head coach, that was the predicted over/under for the 2009 season: 4 wins. In my opinion that was Sark’s best year winning 5 because it should have been 6 if not for the rigged Notre Dame game. From there on out he may have felt like he was playing with "house money" but after an initial mildly successful season the trend line completely bottomed out.
Sark shouldn’t be judged against Don James and he shouldn’t be judged against TW or Gilbertson. He should be judged by the competition- his contemporaries. And by that measure Sark was stupendously average. Here is his record against P12 coaches over the past 6+ years:
Losing record:
Kelly 0-4
Mora 0-2
Harbaugh 0-2
Erickson 0-2
Helfrich 0-1
Graham 1-2
Shaw 2-3
Kiffin 1-2
Chris Petersen 1-2
.500 record vs:
Mike Stoops 1-1
Neuheisel 1-1
Winning record vs:
Tedford 4-0
Wulff 3-0
Embree 2-0
MacIntyre 2-0
Dykes 2-0
Kish 1-0
Carroll 1-0
Riley 4-2
RichRod 2-1
Whittingham 2-1
Leach 2-1
For the most part Sark got beat by good coaches/programs and beat bad coaches/programs. The exception being his upset of Carroll in 2009 and his domination of Tedford which ultimately got Tedford fired. As Stringer Bell would say:
"That’s good. That’s like a 40-degree day. Ain’t nobody got nothing to say about a 40-degree day. Fifty. Bring a smile to your face. Sixty, people is damn near barbecuing on that motherf***er Go down to 20, they get their bitch on. Get their blood complaining. But forty? Nobody give a crap about 40. Nobody remember 40, and y’all is giving me way too many 40-degree days!"
Sark was a 40 degree day whose main claim to fame was that it had been negative 10 for the previous two days. -
Sark is undefeated against Pete Carroll!!!!!1
