Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Signature win for Pete?

DeepSeaZ Member Posts: 3,901

October 2015 in Hardcore Husky Board

Or no because Sark is Sark?

5 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Comments

• 

  PurpleThrobber Member Posts: 49,030

  October 2015

  DeepSeaZ said:

  Or no because Sark is Sark?

  ABUNDANCE!

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  Passion Member Posts: 4,622

  October 2015

  Fucker. You beat me.

  1 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,630

  October 2015

  Great win. Not a signature win. The signature win will come if the offense ever gets their shit together.

  7 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  Mosster47 Member Posts: 6,246

  October 2015

  RoadDawg55 said:

  Great win. Not a signature win. The signature win will come if the offense ever gets their shit together.

  #beatoregonnothingelsematters
  

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  SteveInShelton Member Posts: 1,611

  October 2015

  I'm dooging hard right now, but no way this is a signature win. We tried to give them the game multiple times, but Sark gonna Sark.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194

  October 2015

  I remember our 2009 victory over USC... I thought we were back... Like there is more to like about Petersen than Sark but RD55 summed it up.

  2 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  CuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,500

  October 2015

  No... But it definitely confirms Pete was at least an upgrade to fat fuck dude brah.

  6 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
• 

  greenblood Member Posts: 14,573

  October 2015

  If a coach's signature win is against Sark, then he shouldn't be coaching. It's like beating a midget in a dunk contest.

  4 · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter