Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Seahawks will go at least 5-1 in next 6 games
RoadDawg55
Member Posts: 30,142
in NFL Talk
Chicago - W
Detroit - W
@Cincinnati - L
Carolina - W
@SF - W
@Dal - W
If they didn't lose to St. Louis tonight wouldn't be a big deal.
Detroit - W
@Cincinnati - L
Carolina - W
@SF - W
@Dal - W
If they didn't lose to St. Louis tonight wouldn't be a big deal.
Comments
-
They might win all of those games listed.
-
0-16!
-
Yep. I would even list Cincinatti as a 50/50 game
-
RoadDawg's RYK
-
When did they fire Bevell and pay Kam?RoadDawg55 said:Chicago - W
Detroit - W
@Cincinnati - L
Carolina - W
@SF - W
@Dal - W
If they didn't lose to St. Louis tonight wouldn't be a big deal.
CHI is a sure win. DET and CAR should be too.
SF is a trap game on Thursday Night.
5-1 should happen, but it's no lock. -
That seems about right. I don't know how long Tony Homo and Dezzz are out, but a broken clavicle has to be 6-10 weeks. If they're both back somehow, that's 50/50.
It's kind of loser talk but they've gone 36-14 since 2012 and 30-9 since that Dolphin game in 2012, plus two NFC titles and a SB. Everyone on here would have been really happy with that three years ago.
I can live with 11 but hopefully 12 wins and hopefully at least a bye. I really don't see any nfc squad on their level besides the Pack. -
I can live with 0-16.
-
I agree with Sven that SF is a trap game, but Dallas will also be tricky. Believe it or not, but Weeden actually looked better than Romo at times last week. Romo is obviously better, but that offensive line is very good, and they'll make most quarterbacks better. Also that Dallas defense is stingy. Seattle may have a hard time getting points in that game. Seattle could go 5-1 but could also very easily go 3-3.RoadDawg55 said:Chicago - W
Detroit - W
@Cincinnati - L
Carolina - W
@SF - W
@Dal - W
If they didn't lose to St. Louis tonight wouldn't be a big deal.
Actually, didn't Dallas beat them last year? If I remember right, Dallas controlled most of that game. -
Lol at the "Weeden doesn't look that bad guys!" crowd. Just wait until teams have a week to prepare for him. He started a game for them last year with the same O line and was complete garbage. Weeden is horrible.
-
My sources are telling me Kam and Marshawn made a pact two years ago ...
And now he is back to go to the big dance.
Bidness can wait ...
-
Bump.DerekJohnson said:They might win all of those games listed.
-
Lol the same record as the Redskins
-
Not sure which signing in a vacuum was the bad one, but seems like the cumulative effect of signing the whole defense may have been a mistake. It's likely that it's all just regression to the mean, in which case it wasn't a smart move.
-
Seahawks are a shell of the former team.
It's over for this bunch. -
Which division is shittier though?whlinder said:Lol the same record as the Redskins
-
Lynch looks done, that's not being talked about.
-
Probably, but who can tell with the shit OL and the shittier OC?Bob_C said:Lynch looks done, that's not being talked about.
-
dont forget about this guyTierbsHsotBoobs said:
Probably, but who can tell with the shit OL and the shittier OC?Bob_C said:Lynch looks done, that's not being talked about.
holy fucking deer in headlights, batman. -
Pats are 5-0.
-
The hawks are the next NFL dynasty. Everi tuff liberal longershorefishermanlogger says so.
-
Hawks need to lock up their core guys to lifetime contracts.
-
Dick Fain ultimate Hook
@dickfain: @kermitthejeep we've trailed for only 8% of the last 2 games and are 0-2. Get the 4th q communication issues fixed and we will bomb fools. -
I like to point out they were 3-3 last year so if they are 2-4 now they will finish 11-5. Simple math.
-
#whyicameback
