Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm not the biggest fan

124

Comments

  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,478
    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
    ThomasFremont said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Everyone's doing it
    Wow. Impressive. You'd think that was the entire point or something. . . . .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,778
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Can't wait for Bama-Wisconsin!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,478
    edited September 2015
    f
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).

    I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.


    BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.


    Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.


    BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.

    You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.

    My condolences.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    EwaDawg said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
    ThomasFremont said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Everyone's doing it
    Wow. Impressive. You'd think that was the entire point or something. . . . .
    WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 26,309 Standard Supporter
    EwaDawg said:

    f

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).

    I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.


    BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.


    Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.


    BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.

    You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.

    My condolences.

    Are you saying ESPN is biased toward the SEC? Blasphemy!! Impossible!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,865 Founders Club
    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Doogles said:

    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.

    SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,140 Founders Club
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    2013: Boise State, Illinois, Idaho State

    2014: Hawaii, Eastern Washington, Illinois, Georgia State

    2015: Boise State, Utah State, Sacramento State

    And Pool Boy wants fashion shows to bring in more fans. Fuck.

    POTD. For reals.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter