Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

I'm not the biggest fan

2»

Comments

  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,332
    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
    ThomasFremont said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Everyone's doing it
    Wow. Impressive. You'd think that was the entire point or something. . . . .
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Can't wait for Bama-Wisconsin!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • EwaDawg
    EwaDawg Member Posts: 4,332
    edited September 2015
    f
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).

    I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.


    BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.


    Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.


    BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.

    You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.

    My condolences.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • ThomasFremont
    ThomasFremont Member Posts: 13,325
    EwaDawg said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    I'll help Boobs here because he is struggling to put together a coherent thought. The biggest flaw in the methodology is that OOC results are nearly all that matter since conference
    ThomasFremont said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    UW's schedule is the consensus toughest in the pac ten. Some respected national publications have it as the toughest in the country.

    Fuck! I miss Washington, Damnit.
    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Hey DJ. After this fund drive can you have one to pay for Boobs' reading comprehension classes?


    "EVERYONE IS DOING IT"



    Of course a Jeffrey Dahmer type lobotomy may be his only salvation.



    http://www.philsteele.com/Blogs/2015/MAR15/DBMar13.html

    PS.. Boobs.Isnt.Intelligent


    That is terrible methodology.

    UW could play three high end FCS schools and have the toughest schedule in the nation by far using that methodology.

    I'd say you are better than this but I know better than that.

    Its a methodology which beats (by a zillion miles) you just pulling shit outta your ass. And, no, UW couldn't schedule 3 high end FCS teams.

    Besides, the PAC has BALLS. They would NEVER schedule (consistently) like the PANSY ASS SEC.


    Chr!st. You are dumber than even I thought.

    By the way, 8 of the 12 Pac-12 schools are playing FCS teams this year. They can't say shit about TUFF scheduling.
    Everyone's doing it
    Wow. Impressive. You'd think that was the entire point or something. . . . .
    WHOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,584 Standard Supporter
    EwaDawg said:

    f

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    EwaDawg said:

    Hippopeteamus said:

    everyone is doing it.


    Two MWC teams, a Big Sky team, and nine Pac-12 teams is soft by any national scheduling standard.
    Well, UW's schedule is # 18 of what 110? (using the biased SEC (ESPN) rankings that you seem to think are accurate).

    I'll just take your statement above as PROOF POSITIVE THAT YOU SPEAK OUT OF YOUR ASS.


    BTW, believing that ESPN is unbiased in regards to ranking schedules and teams is akin to saying you would believe a similar ranking put out by the P12.


    Look into that lobotomy. You are ENTIRELY WORTHLESS as far as logic goes.


    BTW, I am done with you. I forgot the # 1 tenant for discussions. Never correct a stupid person. Always correct the smartest person in the room.

    You, my fren, are too stupid to realize you are not smart.

    My condolences.

    Are you saying ESPN is biased toward the SEC? Blasphemy!! Impossible!!!!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Doogles
    Doogles Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,725 Founders Club
    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Doogles said:

    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.

    SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club
    image
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TTJ
    TTJ Member Posts: 4,827
    whatshouldicareabout said:

    2013: Boise State, Illinois, Idaho State

    2014: Hawaii, Eastern Washington, Illinois, Georgia State

    2015: Boise State, Utah State, Sacramento State

    And Pool Boy wants fashion shows to bring in more fans. Fuck.

    POTD. For reals.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,584 Standard Supporter
    edited September 2015
    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Doogles said:

    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.

    SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
    If they don't play two FCS, they play a FCS and a total bottom feeder "FBS" like Western Kentucky Arkie State, some Tennesse directional college, North Texas etc. Hell, they often play two of those.

    The SEC "dominance" is over. Let it go...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TierbsHsotBoobs
    TierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    TierbsHsotBoobs said:

    Doogles said:

    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.

    SEC teams usually don't pay two FCS teams, but you Doogs hate facts.
    If they don't play two FCS, they play a FCS and a total bottom feeder "FBS" like Western Kentucky Arkie State, some Tennesse directional college, North Texas etc. Hell, they often play two of those.

    The SEC "dominance" is over. Let it go...
    You mean like playing Eastern Washington AND Georgia State?

    Get the fuck over this bullshit. Until UW steps up its scheduling again, we got nothing to say here.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RichardWang
    RichardWang Member Posts: 1
    Doogles said:

    It sucks that better OOC games aren't being played across the board, but the main gripe I have with the SEC is if your conference has 14 teams in it you need to play the most teams within the conference as possible to get true divisional champions. Instead of playing that very doable 9th conference game, they opt to add an additional fcs opponent. That's what's bullshit.

    It would be like instead of playing UCLA last year we just had Georgia State. It changes a lot.

    They also like to schedule one of said FCS opponents in the middle of November, effectively padding their record and giving themselves a week off. The SEC being the best conference is a fucking myth.

    Two middle of the road Big12 teams go into the might SEC and are among the league's best right away. 6-6 A&M in Big12 ('11) = 11-2 A&M in SEC West ('12). Missouri, an average at best team in the Big 12 has already won the SEC east a couple times. Washington State, the doormat of the PAC 12 almost went on the road and beat Auburn, who would go on to win the whole conference that season.

    Did Utah or CU have the same effect in the PAC? Absolutely not, they were stepping up to a much better conference. It took Utah until last season to compete. Apparently going from the Big12 to the SEC is not really a step up at all.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter